<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil is Back Up! Sort of!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-back-up-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-back-up-sort-of/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karlonia - Cuil Results</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-back-up-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Karlonia - Cuil Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Apparently Cuil was not quite ready for launch during the first day or two - many medium long tail queries did not return results at all, and even general queries returned way fewer results than they should have considering Cuil&#039;s claims of having indexed so many pages already. They did improve somewhat afterward, however, and seem to be picking up more results and increasing relevance as more people have been testing out the engine.
 
In the long run, I hope they get things together and perform well enough to compete with the major search engines and then maybe do some advertising. I would like to see more serious competitors to Google in order to hold their power in check and encourage more transparency overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Cuil was not quite ready for launch during the first day or two &#8211; many medium long tail queries did not return results at all, and even general queries returned way fewer results than they should have considering Cuil&#8217;s claims of having indexed so many pages already. They did improve somewhat afterward, however, and seem to be picking up more results and increasing relevance as more people have been testing out the engine.</p>
<p>In the long run, I hope they get things together and perform well enough to compete with the major search engines and then maybe do some advertising. I would like to see more serious competitors to Google in order to hold their power in check and encourage more transparency overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan tynan</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-back-up-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>dan tynan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-108</guid>
		<description>you know, my second thought (after the one that cuil was just a terrible name) was that it looked like a gaelic word. and damned if I wasn&#039;t right. thanks for the shoutout, hm.

dt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, my second thought (after the one that cuil was just a terrible name) was that it looked like a gaelic word. and damned if I wasn&#8217;t right. thanks for the shoutout, hm.</p>
<p>dt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Reasons It&#8217;s So Damn Hard to Out-Google Google&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-back-up-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Reasons It&#8217;s So Damn Hard to Out-Google Google&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] Not Yet&#8211;Not&#160;HardlyFaTe on Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, Not Yet&#8211;Not&#160;HardlyCuil is Back Up! Sort of!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer on Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, Not Yet&#8211;Not&#160;Hardly&#124; Social softies on Is Cuil a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not Yet&#8211;Not&nbsp;HardlyFaTe on Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, Not Yet&#8211;Not&nbsp;HardlyCuil is Back Up! Sort of!&nbsp;|&nbsp;Technologizer on Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, Not Yet&#8211;Not&nbsp;Hardly| Social softies on Is Cuil a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
