<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, Not Yet&#8211;Not Hardly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google会被打败么？ - 想乐空间</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-63450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google会被打败么？ - 想乐空间]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-63450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stand with the express goal of shattering the McDonald&#8217;s hegemony. (In Silicon Valley, one failed would-be Google killer, Cuil, is practically synonymous with overweening [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stand with the express goal of shattering the McDonald&#8217;s hegemony. (In Silicon Valley, one failed would-be Google killer, Cuil, is practically synonymous with overweening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Should Be Using Wolfram&#124;Alpha Instead of Google for Search - Techland - TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-63045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Should Be Using Wolfram&#124;Alpha Instead of Google for Search - Techland - TIME.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-63045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to set itself up as a Google rival, or to be perceived as a Google killer. I mention Cuil, the definitive failed Google killer. But there&#039;s another example that&#039;s worth remembering: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to set itself up as a Google rival, or to be perceived as a Google killer. I mention Cuil, the definitive failed Google killer. But there&#039;s another example that&#039;s worth remembering: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search-Engine Wars: Can Bing (or Blekko) Beat Google? &#124; 义乌外贸之家</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-63024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Search-Engine Wars: Can Bing (or Blekko) Beat Google? &#124; 义乌外贸之家]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-63024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stand with the express goal of shattering the McDonald&#8217;s hegemony. (In Silicon Valley, one failed would-be Google killer, Cuil, is practically synonymous with overweening ambition.) (See a new Google product in TIME&#8217;s 50 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stand with the express goal of shattering the McDonald&#8217;s hegemony. (In Silicon Valley, one failed would-be Google killer, Cuil, is practically synonymous with overweening ambition.) (See a new Google product in TIME&#8217;s 50 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye Cuil?</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-58746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodbye Cuil?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 05:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-58746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Friday, September 17, 2010   TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington is reporting that Cuil&#8211;the dreadful search engine that claimed to be better than Google, and which later launched a bizarre automated Wikipedia competitor&#8211;is down. And maybe out for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday, September 17, 2010   TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington is reporting that Cuil&#8211;the dreadful search engine that claimed to be better than Google, and which later launched a bizarre automated Wikipedia competitor&#8211;is down. And maybe out for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Me Once, Shame On You… &#124; Tech News, Reviews, Business, Health News and More</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-41411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuil Me Once, Shame On You… &#124; Tech News, Reviews, Business, Health News and More]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-41411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] = 60; &#013;Remember Cuil? Back in 2008, The search engine gained brief notoriety back in 2008 by claiming to be better than Google when it was in fact laughably, bizarrely bad. Then it mostly disappeared, except when bloggers need a synonym for “failed launch” or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] = 60; &#013;Remember Cuil? Back in 2008, The search engine gained brief notoriety back in 2008 by claiming to be better than Google when it was in fact laughably, bizarrely bad. Then it mostly disappeared, except when bloggers need a synonym for “failed launch” or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Me Once, Shame On You&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-39934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuil Me Once, Shame On You&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-39934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all: News   Remember Cuil? Back in 2008, The search engine gained brief notoriety back in 2008 by claiming to be better than Google when it was in fact laughably, bizarrely bad. Then it mostly disappeared, except when bloggers need a synonym for &#8220;failed launch&#8221; or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all: News   Remember Cuil? Back in 2008, The search engine gained brief notoriety back in 2008 by claiming to be better than Google when it was in fact laughably, bizarrely bad. Then it mostly disappeared, except when bloggers need a synonym for &#8220;failed launch&#8221; or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SocialSofties &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stilte aub</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SocialSofties &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stilte aub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Reden 3 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reden 3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlonia - Cuil Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karlonia - Cuil Search Engine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently Cuil was not quite ready for launch during the first day or two - many medium long tail queries did not return results at all, and even general queries returned way fewer results than they should have considering Cuil&#039;s claims of having indexed so many pages already. They did improve somewhat afterward, however, and seem to be picking up more results and increasing relevance as more people have been testing out the engine. 

In the long run, I hope they get things together and perform well enough to compete with the major search engines and then maybe do some advertising. I would like to see more serious competitors to Google in order to hold their power in check and encourage more transparency overall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Cuil was not quite ready for launch during the first day or two &#8211; many medium long tail queries did not return results at all, and even general queries returned way fewer results than they should have considering Cuil&#8217;s claims of having indexed so many pages already. They did improve somewhat afterward, however, and seem to be picking up more results and increasing relevance as more people have been testing out the engine. </p>
<p>In the long run, I hope they get things together and perform well enough to compete with the major search engines and then maybe do some advertising. I would like to see more serious competitors to Google in order to hold their power in check and encourage more transparency overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google, Cuil of Dabedoo? &#171; Doc 1.5</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google, Cuil of Dabedoo? &#171; Doc 1.5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, not yet - not hardly [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Cuil a Googleslayer? Nope, not yet &#8211; not hardly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil gelir hoş gelir</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/07/28/is-cuil-a-googleslayer-nope-not-yet-not-hardly/comment-page-2/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuil gelir hoş gelir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sonuç sayılarına bakınca Googe’ın Cuil’e nazaran çok daha geniş sonuçlar çıkardığı kesin. İndexin sayısının değil uygunluğunun önemli olduğunu burada belirtmek lazım. Şu an için [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sonuç sayılarına bakınca Googe’ın Cuil’e nazaran çok daha geniş sonuçlar çıkardığı kesin. İndexin sayısının değil uygunluğunun önemli olduğunu burada belirtmek lazım. Şu an için [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

