<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetShare: Hello, Goodbye, Hello, Goodbye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech Sassy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tethering officially coming to iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Sassy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tethering officially coming to iPhone?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=488#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>[...] two ways to do this currently &#8220;exist&#8221; (NetShare and iModem), the NetShare app was banned from the Apple App Store and iModem only works with jailbroken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two ways to do this currently &#8220;exist&#8221; (NetShare and iModem), the NetShare app was banned from the Apple App Store and iModem only works with jailbroken [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Remote Viewer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AT&#38;T: Tethering Coming to the iPhone Soon</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-4544</link>
		<dc:creator>The Remote Viewer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AT&#38;T: Tethering Coming to the iPhone Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=488#comment-4544</guid>
		<description>[...] are at least two existing tethering options for the iPhone: NetShare and iModem. The former was removed from Apple’s iPhone App Store and the latter only works on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are at least two existing tethering options for the iPhone: NetShare and iModem. The former was removed from Apple’s iPhone App Store and the latter only works on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T iPhone 3G tethering pronto &#124; Mac User Boricua</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T iPhone 3G tethering pronto &#124; Mac User Boricua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=488#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>[...] conocimiento de todos ya hay algunos que han descubierto soluciones alternativas tales como PDANet, NetShare, iModem soluciones que estan disponible vía Jailbreak.  [Vía [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conocimiento de todos ya hay algunos que han descubierto soluciones alternativas tales como PDANet, NetShare, iModem soluciones que estan disponible vía Jailbreak.  [Vía [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Working With Apple On Legal iPhone Tethering : tinyComb</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T Working With Apple On Legal iPhone Tethering : tinyComb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=488#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>[...] NetShare and iModem are two current iPhone tethering applications that need a jaibroken phone for them to be downloaded. Both are not available through the App Store. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NetShare and iModem are two current iPhone tethering applications that need a jaibroken phone for them to be downloaded. Both are not available through the App Store. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple to iPhone Developers: Don&#8217;t Compete With Us?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple to iPhone Developers: Don&#8217;t Compete With Us?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=488#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>[...] App Store debuted in July, Apple has apparently listed then delisted (then relisted then delisted) Netshare, an application for tethering the iPhone to a laptop as a modem. I can&#8217;t get too irate, since the app seems to clearly violate AT&amp;T&#8217;s terms of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] App Store debuted in July, Apple has apparently listed then delisted (then relisted then delisted) Netshare, an application for tethering the iPhone to a laptop as a modem. I can&#8217;t get too irate, since the app seems to clearly violate AT&amp;T&#8217;s terms of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wilson</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/02/netshare-hello-goodbye-hello-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=488#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Tethering is a good thing (obviously), but NetShare goes about it all wrong. Here&#039;s why:

1. It doesn&#039;t actually tether - that is, it&#039;s not a modem that your computer uses to create a real IP connection. Instead, it&#039;s a proxy - with all the problems involved with using proxy servers.
2. It requires you to set up an ad-hoc WiFi connection. Not only is that a PITA, but other people could then hijack your iPhone&#039;s internet connection
3. Tethering requires a more expensive data plan (to the tune of $60). Using a proxy to bypass that is violating AT&amp;T&#039;s terms of use. 

Imagine if you and everyone else who installed NetShare suddenly lost your AT&amp;T account. Not only would you lose cell service, rendering the iPhone useless, but you&#039;d still have to pay the $185 (or whatever it is right now) termination fee. Not only is this possible, but it&#039;s pretty easy for AT&amp;T to do: the simple act of monitoring HTTP requests and checking the user-agent would be enough to prove that you&#039;d used your PC, instead of the iPhone&#039;s browser. (yes, you could change your user agent, but that won&#039;t affect the logs that are already sitting on an AT&amp;T proxy server somewhere...)

If Apple and AT&amp;T want to set up tethering on the iPhone, I think it&#039;s a great idea - and I&#039;d definitely sing up. (I already have a separate cellular modem, and I love it.) But it needs to be done right: the iPhone needs to be set up as a USB modem, and you would then use the proper data plan with AT&amp;T. Done that way, it would only cost $30 more than what you&#039;re paying now.

Incidentally, you CAN get a wireless modem from AT&amp;T for free if you sign up for a wireless broadband account, but you&#039;d then be spending an extra $60 for the wireless broadband account. Maybe AT&amp;T could give us a break and only charge iPhone users $30 to use a dedicated wireless modem... I&#039;d go for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tethering is a good thing (obviously), but NetShare goes about it all wrong. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1. It doesn&#8217;t actually tether &#8211; that is, it&#8217;s not a modem that your computer uses to create a real IP connection. Instead, it&#8217;s a proxy &#8211; with all the problems involved with using proxy servers.<br />
2. It requires you to set up an ad-hoc WiFi connection. Not only is that a PITA, but other people could then hijack your iPhone&#8217;s internet connection<br />
3. Tethering requires a more expensive data plan (to the tune of $60). Using a proxy to bypass that is violating AT&amp;T&#8217;s terms of use. </p>
<p>Imagine if you and everyone else who installed NetShare suddenly lost your AT&amp;T account. Not only would you lose cell service, rendering the iPhone useless, but you&#8217;d still have to pay the $185 (or whatever it is right now) termination fee. Not only is this possible, but it&#8217;s pretty easy for AT&amp;T to do: the simple act of monitoring HTTP requests and checking the user-agent would be enough to prove that you&#8217;d used your PC, instead of the iPhone&#8217;s browser. (yes, you could change your user agent, but that won&#8217;t affect the logs that are already sitting on an AT&amp;T proxy server somewhere&#8230;)</p>
<p>If Apple and AT&amp;T want to set up tethering on the iPhone, I think it&#8217;s a great idea &#8211; and I&#8217;d definitely sing up. (I already have a separate cellular modem, and I love it.) But it needs to be done right: the iPhone needs to be set up as a USB modem, and you would then use the proper data plan with AT&amp;T. Done that way, it would only cost $30 more than what you&#8217;re paying now.</p>
<p>Incidentally, you CAN get a wireless modem from AT&amp;T for free if you sign up for a wireless broadband account, but you&#8217;d then be spending an extra $60 for the wireless broadband account. Maybe AT&amp;T could give us a break and only charge iPhone users $30 to use a dedicated wireless modem&#8230; I&#8217;d go for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
