<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An &#8220;iPhone Nano?&#8221; Maybe, But Surely Not This One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh &#124; iPhone Firmware</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-85562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh &#124; iPhone Firmware]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-85562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Harry McCracken notes that he anticiaptes an iPhone nano at some point in the future, but this ain&#8217;t it. All I want for Christmas is an iPhone that works on the Verizon network. I&#8217;ll have a long wait, I reckon. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harry McCracken notes that he anticiaptes an iPhone nano at some point in the future, but this ain&#8217;t it. All I want for Christmas is an iPhone that works on the Verizon network. I&#8217;ll have a long wait, I reckon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applerumors &#171; eonly.us</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-46220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[applerumors &#171; eonly.us]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 08:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-46220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] saying that a publication like the UK&#8217;s Daily Mail declares that Apple is about to release an iPhone Nano with a display on the front and touch-wheel control on the back, it&#8217;s far safer to assume it&#8217;s wrong than to believe [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saying that a publication like the UK&#8217;s Daily Mail declares that Apple is about to release an iPhone Nano with a display on the front and touch-wheel control on the back, it&#8217;s far safer to assume it&#8217;s wrong than to believe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Times the iPhone Traffic on AT&#38;T Come June? How Come?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-12665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ten Times the iPhone Traffic on AT&#38;T Come June? How Come?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-12665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about new cheapo iPhones are, appropriately, a dime a dozen, and most don&#8217;t sound very convincing. Working on nothing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about new cheapo iPhones are, appropriately, a dime a dozen, and most don&#8217;t sound very convincing. Working on nothing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Nano</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-7171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bookmarks about Nano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-7171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by kabuto777 on 2008-12-05  An “iPhone Nano?” Maybe, But Surely Not This One  http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/ - bookmarked by [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 1 members originally found by kabuto777 on 2008-12-05  An “iPhone Nano?” Maybe, But Surely Not This One  <a href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/" rel="nofollow">http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/</a> &#8211; bookmarked by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone News</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think they need to be smaller. they do look slightly too big at the moment]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think they need to be smaller. they do look slightly too big at the moment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone News</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it was reported in the daily mail. they said that the product will be launched in the UK at up to £150 for pay-as-you-go customers by O2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was reported in the daily mail. they said that the product will be launched in the UK at up to £150 for pay-as-you-go customers by O2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone News</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haven&#039;t apple denied this recently?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haven&#8217;t apple denied this recently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time traces &#187; Apple Rumor-Rama: New MacBook, iPods On Tap?</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Time traces &#187; Apple Rumor-Rama: New MacBook, iPods On Tap?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] And that other rumor? You know, the iPhone Nano that was reported in the Daily Mail? Well, as Harry McCracken, former editor in chief of PC World, put it on his Technologizer site, &#8220;There are Apple rumors that ring true. There are ones that sound like they might be true. And then t...&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And that other rumor? You know, the iPhone Nano that was reported in the Daily Mail? Well, as Harry McCracken, former editor in chief of PC World, put it on his Technologizer site, &#8220;There are Apple rumors that ring true. There are ones that sound like they might be true. And then t&#8230;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregPC</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregPC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dial on the back?  makes sense to me.  you scratch my back I&#039;ll scratch yours is the idea i guess.   Hmmm - and the phone will go for 150L (300$) -  I know that prices in the UK are higher for technology but that doesn&#039;t seem like much of a deal . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dial on the back?  makes sense to me.  you scratch my back I&#8217;ll scratch yours is the idea i guess.   Hmmm &#8211; and the phone will go for 150L (300$) &#8211;  I know that prices in the UK are higher for technology but that doesn&#8217;t seem like much of a deal . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Burke</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/03/an-iphone-nano-maybe-but-surely-not-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Burke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...the relatively low price of $199.&quot; Faulty reasoning--with the subsidies Apple gets from carriers (and therefore indirectly from consumers), it sells the iPhone for a lot more than $199.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the relatively low price of $199.&#8221; Faulty reasoning&#8211;with the subsidies Apple gets from carriers (and therefore indirectly from consumers), it sells the iPhone for a lot more than $199.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

