<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Airport Security Laptop Rules: Simpler? Maybe!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/15/new-airport-security-laptop-rules-simpler-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/15/new-airport-security-laptop-rules-simpler-maybe/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angela Gunn</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/15/new-airport-security-laptop-rules-simpler-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=911#comment-455</guid>
		<description>(reading last paragraph) Clearly things are going much better in the Bay Area than they are up here in Seattle; I&#039;m *still* seeing folks who are dumbfounded by the liquids 3-1-1 system. OTOH, I also seem to encounter a lot of people who don&#039;t know to take off their jackets, and a month or so ago I watched some lady argue about whether she should get to carry her purse through the detector. (And Sea-Tac lately seems to be specializing in women who try to wear those buckle-festooned gladiator-type sandals though Security. Grr.)

I don&#039;t hold out much hope for the new bag rules, since the sticking point with laptops still seems to be the training of the screener, but so far I&#039;m pleasantly surprised by the experience-sorted lane system. People up here seem to be correctly assessing their own familiarity with checkpoint procedures and choosing the right lane, even though I&#039;m sure the less frequent flyers must find the short, fast Black Diamond lanes mighty tempting. It is, at least, an efficient stage-management technique for the current airport security theater. Is that the experience of other travelers, I wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(reading last paragraph) Clearly things are going much better in the Bay Area than they are up here in Seattle; I&#8217;m *still* seeing folks who are dumbfounded by the liquids 3-1-1 system. OTOH, I also seem to encounter a lot of people who don&#8217;t know to take off their jackets, and a month or so ago I watched some lady argue about whether she should get to carry her purse through the detector. (And Sea-Tac lately seems to be specializing in women who try to wear those buckle-festooned gladiator-type sandals though Security. Grr.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hold out much hope for the new bag rules, since the sticking point with laptops still seems to be the training of the screener, but so far I&#8217;m pleasantly surprised by the experience-sorted lane system. People up here seem to be correctly assessing their own familiarity with checkpoint procedures and choosing the right lane, even though I&#8217;m sure the less frequent flyers must find the short, fast Black Diamond lanes mighty tempting. It is, at least, an efficient stage-management technique for the current airport security theater. Is that the experience of other travelers, I wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
