<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Macs More Expensive? Round Two: Survival of the Cheapest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keys Corner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How long is a piece of string?</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-3/#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>Keys Corner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How long is a piece of string?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>[...] answer is: it depends.About the same price for a similar specificationAbout double for a basic machineSo it depends what your priorities are. But if you are considering buying a new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] answer is: it depends.About the same price for a similar specificationAbout double for a basic machineSo it depends what your priorities are. But if you are considering buying a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileMe = Apple+GMail &#171; Scubed</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-3/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileMe = Apple+GMail &#171; Scubed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>[...] comparisons out there with regards to cost of Macs versus Windows, ranging from significantly more expensive to comparable and so on. For me, it boils down to whether I want to pay a premium for an icon of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comparisons out there with regards to cost of Macs versus Windows, ranging from significantly more expensive to comparable and so on. For me, it boils down to whether I want to pay a premium for an icon of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yacko</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-3/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Yacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-716</guid>
		<description>* Learning that it is decidedly not true that the Mac can safely run without antivirus, antispyware, antimalware programs.

Perhaps you would care to elaborate on this and explain why you feel this way? I think it&#039;s more likely as another comment mentioned - &quot;he had a problem and believes it was caused by a virus&quot;. When a paranoid former Windows user has even a slight Mac problem all their mind can turn to as an explanation is malware or maintenance like defrag. I can assure Windows users, their is no fear factor using a Mac, no self-corrupted or slow filesystems, no bad attachments, no wrong email messages to click on, no bad web sites that could compromise, no chance your machine could be relaying info to bad guys or used as a zombie pawn spewing spam to others. The normal Windows user lives in fear and a Mac user has none. No matter how you compare Macs to Windows machines, this one characteristic alone makes the Mac advantage priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Learning that it is decidedly not true that the Mac can safely run without antivirus, antispyware, antimalware programs.</p>
<p>Perhaps you would care to elaborate on this and explain why you feel this way? I think it&#8217;s more likely as another comment mentioned &#8211; &#8220;he had a problem and believes it was caused by a virus&#8221;. When a paranoid former Windows user has even a slight Mac problem all their mind can turn to as an explanation is malware or maintenance like defrag. I can assure Windows users, their is no fear factor using a Mac, no self-corrupted or slow filesystems, no bad attachments, no wrong email messages to click on, no bad web sites that could compromise, no chance your machine could be relaying info to bad guys or used as a zombie pawn spewing spam to others. The normal Windows user lives in fear and a Mac user has none. No matter how you compare Macs to Windows machines, this one characteristic alone makes the Mac advantage priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technogeekanerd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0018</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-3/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Technogeekanerd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0018</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-635</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Macs More Expensive? Round Two: Survival of the Cheapest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Macs More Expensive? Round Two: Survival of the Cheapest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holycalamity</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-3/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>holycalamity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Relyt, I think that&#039;s a fair point. I&#039;ve been using Macs practically my entire life, but I get that it&#039;s not right for everyone (a point which even the &quot;Mac vs PC&quot; commercials concede). If you have very, very specific needs or prefer to build your own computer, Windows PCs are probably better for you.

But I sense that for most people who want a mid- to high-end machine for more than just emailing and web browsing, and they&#039;re looking at mass market Dells and HPs, Apple machines are a more than viable choice, and the &quot;overpriced&quot; complaints are just ignorant or dishonest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relyt, I think that&#8217;s a fair point. I&#8217;ve been using Macs practically my entire life, but I get that it&#8217;s not right for everyone (a point which even the &#8220;Mac vs PC&#8221; commercials concede). If you have very, very specific needs or prefer to build your own computer, Windows PCs are probably better for you.</p>
<p>But I sense that for most people who want a mid- to high-end machine for more than just emailing and web browsing, and they&#8217;re looking at mass market Dells and HPs, Apple machines are a more than viable choice, and the &#8220;overpriced&#8221; complaints are just ignorant or dishonest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relyt</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-2/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Relyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Another point: Macs try to be all-in-one machines (and they do a pretty good job of doing that) as oppose to PCs differ: they could be minimalist, have &quot;too much features&quot;, specialize in a certain area (like speed), etc. With PCs you can pick and choose what is in and powering your machine, but with Macs you pick the one that fits you budget and have to go with it. The choice (and no, I am not prioritizing PCs) is yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point: Macs try to be all-in-one machines (and they do a pretty good job of doing that) as oppose to PCs differ: they could be minimalist, have &#8220;too much features&#8221;, specialize in a certain area (like speed), etc. With PCs you can pick and choose what is in and powering your machine, but with Macs you pick the one that fits you budget and have to go with it. The choice (and no, I am not prioritizing PCs) is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jari</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-2/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-542</guid>
		<description>I constantly see ads about these cheap Windows-laptops and actually own one (around $700). I also own a &quot;higher end&quot; laptop running also Windows ($1500).

The cheap one is a fully functional laptop and can handle needs of a basic user. But I prefer the more powerful one and use it for my work. The processor, HD, RAM, casing, screen and other features ain&#039;t comparable on those two, the twice as more expensive is better on every aspect.

Since I got my first Mac (Mini) I instantly started to plan the purchase of a Mac-laptop, nevertheless my PC is working alright and does the job perfectly for what it&#039;s meant for. What is most important, the price isn&#039;t the issue - I wouldn&#039;t buy a PC under $1000 anyhow for the job I want it to handle. I think that Vista is great OS, but out of those two I just want it to be Mac.

You can get a good laptop with $1500 and you can get a working laptop with $500.

If you want a good one, my conclusion is that it&#039;s a more of an OS question better than a hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I constantly see ads about these cheap Windows-laptops and actually own one (around $700). I also own a &#8220;higher end&#8221; laptop running also Windows ($1500).</p>
<p>The cheap one is a fully functional laptop and can handle needs of a basic user. But I prefer the more powerful one and use it for my work. The processor, HD, RAM, casing, screen and other features ain&#8217;t comparable on those two, the twice as more expensive is better on every aspect.</p>
<p>Since I got my first Mac (Mini) I instantly started to plan the purchase of a Mac-laptop, nevertheless my PC is working alright and does the job perfectly for what it&#8217;s meant for. What is most important, the price isn&#8217;t the issue &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t buy a PC under $1000 anyhow for the job I want it to handle. I think that Vista is great OS, but out of those two I just want it to be Mac.</p>
<p>You can get a good laptop with $1500 and you can get a working laptop with $500.</p>
<p>If you want a good one, my conclusion is that it&#8217;s a more of an OS question better than a hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britt</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-2/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Heh... well, I&#039;m running a 24&quot; iMac, that&#039;s about 1.5 yrs old, latest Leopard, 3GB ram, and a 2Ghz core 2 duo... at the moment I&#039;ve got 15 apps open, and it&#039;s running just fine (about 85% idle, according to Activity Monitor).

Having built a number of PCs, and running Parallels on my Mac, I can say that installing Windows on a PC is just as hard, often harder, as installing it on a Mac - on the PC, there&#039;s a driver disk (or download) for every device; on the Mac, there&#039;s just one (or, for Parallels, no driver disk at all; Parallels will run the installer for you).

At the moment, .mac/mobileMe is a mess... Perhaps they&#039;ll get if fixed soon, but until that happens... I would avoid it for now. I also wouldn&#039;t use iWeb for anything serious; it&#039;s really a basic program. I use RapidWeaver, and sometimes edit the files with TextWrangler, and push the resulting HTML (and css, js, etc) files up to a standard linux web server.

Time Machine does **NOT** store your files in a proprietary format; what&#039;s on the backup drive is the raw files... any machine that can read HFS+ volumes (the standard format for a hard drive on the Mac) can read the data. The one sticking point, for switchers, is that PC&#039;s can&#039;t read HFS+ without a 3rd party utility, so this usually means that to recover data from a Time Machine backup you need a working Mac.

I don&#039;t know where MacHadit is getting advice, but whoever it is isn&#039;t giving accurate info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230; well, I&#8217;m running a 24&#8243; iMac, that&#8217;s about 1.5 yrs old, latest Leopard, 3GB ram, and a 2Ghz core 2 duo&#8230; at the moment I&#8217;ve got 15 apps open, and it&#8217;s running just fine (about 85% idle, according to Activity Monitor).</p>
<p>Having built a number of PCs, and running Parallels on my Mac, I can say that installing Windows on a PC is just as hard, often harder, as installing it on a Mac &#8211; on the PC, there&#8217;s a driver disk (or download) for every device; on the Mac, there&#8217;s just one (or, for Parallels, no driver disk at all; Parallels will run the installer for you).</p>
<p>At the moment, .mac/mobileMe is a mess&#8230; Perhaps they&#8217;ll get if fixed soon, but until that happens&#8230; I would avoid it for now. I also wouldn&#8217;t use iWeb for anything serious; it&#8217;s really a basic program. I use RapidWeaver, and sometimes edit the files with TextWrangler, and push the resulting HTML (and css, js, etc) files up to a standard linux web server.</p>
<p>Time Machine does **NOT** store your files in a proprietary format; what&#8217;s on the backup drive is the raw files&#8230; any machine that can read HFS+ volumes (the standard format for a hard drive on the Mac) can read the data. The one sticking point, for switchers, is that PC&#8217;s can&#8217;t read HFS+ without a 3rd party utility, so this usually means that to recover data from a Time Machine backup you need a working Mac.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where MacHadit is getting advice, but whoever it is isn&#8217;t giving accurate info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul King</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-2/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-534</guid>
		<description>I looked at cheap laptops recently and typically battery life was described as 3 hours or less.  It&#039;s likely that the MacBook has a substantial advantage on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at cheap laptops recently and typically battery life was described as 3 hours or less.  It&#8217;s likely that the MacBook has a substantial advantage on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/16/are-macs-more-expensive-round-two-survival-of-the-cheapest/comment-page-2/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=929#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Oh man! looks like blucaso and I were typing at the same time but boy did s/he beat me to the point. They were virtually all the things I was thinking – only so much better put, and more polite. Well put blucaso. That really was the post I had in my mind.
Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man! looks like blucaso and I were typing at the same time but boy did s/he beat me to the point. They were virtually all the things I was thinking – only so much better put, and more polite. Well put blucaso. That really was the post I had in my mind.<br />
Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
