<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Macs More Expensive? Round Three: An All-in-One Free-For-All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Cranfill</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-12990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raymond Cranfill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-12990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, now, you can get a 24 inch iMac with better specs all &#039;round for $1495.  Seems to me, this would tip the article in greater favor towards the iMac.  Also, the styling on all the other all-in-ones just mentioned falls into the butt-ugly category, although this is a simple matter of taste.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, now, you can get a 24 inch iMac with better specs all &#8217;round for $1495.  Seems to me, this would tip the article in greater favor towards the iMac.  Also, the styling on all the other all-in-ones just mentioned falls into the butt-ugly category, although this is a simple matter of taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon MacKay</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-9846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon MacKay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-9846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more comparison please. The MacBook Pro to comparable Vista laptops. I&#039;ll check back later...
Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more comparison please. The MacBook Pro to comparable Vista laptops. I&#8217;ll check back later&#8230;<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileMe = Apple+GMail &#171; Scubed</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MobileMe = Apple+GMail &#171; Scubed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-3688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] regards to cost of Macs versus Windows, ranging from significantly more expensive to comparable and so on. For me, it boils down to whether I want to pay a premium for an icon of industrial design, an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regards to cost of Macs versus Windows, ranging from significantly more expensive to comparable and so on. For me, it boils down to whether I want to pay a premium for an icon of industrial design, an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-2474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, thanks for doing these comparisons. I have owned an imac for a few months now and love it, but now I&#039;m running into trouble as far as mobility and am looking at a macbook pro instead, but from my personal research, I have come to find that an HP laptop with the same customization is $1500 less than the top model pro, so it would be very helpful whenever you come out with your next comparison. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for doing these comparisons. I have owned an imac for a few months now and love it, but now I&#8217;m running into trouble as far as mobility and am looking at a macbook pro instead, but from my personal research, I have come to find that an HP laptop with the same customization is $1500 less than the top model pro, so it would be very helpful whenever you come out with your next comparison. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... Sorry, I meant to say don&#039;t really know how MS Works works, or what it does feature-wise, but the Mac has Text Edit as the basic word processing application.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Sorry, I meant to say don&#8217;t really know how MS Works works, or what it does feature-wise, but the Mac has Text Edit as the basic word processing application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t know what ms works is, but you failed to mention that the Mac has text edit...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know what ms works is, but you failed to mention that the Mac has text edit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technogeekanerd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0018</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technogeekanerd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0018]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Are Macs More Expensive? Round Three: An All-in-One Free-For-All [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Macs More Expensive? Round Three: An All-in-One Free-For-All [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-3/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One minor point I&#039;m curious about: the Windows systems&#039; wireless keyboards and mice--how do they connect to the PC? Do you use up one of your USB ports with a dongle? The Apple keyboard, being Bluetooth, wouldn&#039;t require one on the iMac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One minor point I&#8217;m curious about: the Windows systems&#8217; wireless keyboards and mice&#8211;how do they connect to the PC? Do you use up one of your USB ports with a dongle? The Apple keyboard, being Bluetooth, wouldn&#8217;t require one on the iMac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-2/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Someone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff,

If you plan on keeping your other PC, then you will have to buy more software anyway.
If you install the software on both PCs and only have one license, you&#039;re breaking the law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>If you plan on keeping your other PC, then you will have to buy more software anyway.<br />
If you install the software on both PCs and only have one license, you&#8217;re breaking the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/17/are-macs-more-expensive-all-in-one/comment-page-2/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided not to bother with Office on the Mac.  I use OpenOffice when I need it.  Still a little buggy, but you can&#039;t beat the price.

I use older iBook and Compaq notebooks for 90% of my work.  Configured nearly identically and from the same era, though the iBook was very slightly cheaper when new.  What I notice is that the Windows machine has taken the biggest performance hit as it&#039;s aged, primarily due to the virus software that virtually makes the machine unusable for 45 minutes a day.

Otherwise, both have held up pretty well to heavy use, though the Compaq looks more dated.  The only thing that&#039;s broken on either of them is a lost window key on the Compaq and a temperamental power brick on the iBook ($80 to replace? Really?)

I did have to pay for one OS upgrade for the Mac when software developers suddenly seemed to abandon support for 10.2.  But then I had to pay for the virus software on the Compaq, so it kind of evens out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided not to bother with Office on the Mac.  I use OpenOffice when I need it.  Still a little buggy, but you can&#8217;t beat the price.</p>
<p>I use older iBook and Compaq notebooks for 90% of my work.  Configured nearly identically and from the same era, though the iBook was very slightly cheaper when new.  What I notice is that the Windows machine has taken the biggest performance hit as it&#8217;s aged, primarily due to the virus software that virtually makes the machine unusable for 45 minutes a day.</p>
<p>Otherwise, both have held up pretty well to heavy use, though the Compaq looks more dated.  The only thing that&#8217;s broken on either of them is a lost window key on the Compaq and a temperamental power brick on the iBook ($80 to replace? Really?)</p>
<p>I did have to pay for one OS upgrade for the Mac when software developers suddenly seemed to abandon support for 10.2.  But then I had to pay for the virus software on the Compaq, so it kind of evens out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

