<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple Shouldn&#8217;t (and Probably Won&#8217;t) Release a Touch-Screen Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technogeekanerd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0019</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Technogeekanerd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0019</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1252#comment-794</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Apple Shouldn’t (and Probably Won’t) Release a Touch-Screen Mac [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Apple Shouldn’t (and Probably Won’t) Release a Touch-Screen Mac [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Geekinator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0019</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>The Geekinator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Geekinator Podcast Episode #0019</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1252#comment-793</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Apple Shouldn’t (and Probably Won’t) Release a Touch-Screen Mac [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Apple Shouldn’t (and Probably Won’t) Release a Touch-Screen Mac [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Harrison</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1252#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Personally, I would love to see some kind of touch device.  I sit here reading this column on my TC1100 (a tablet/hybrid that Apple should have made, it&#039;s so elegant).

I think a big part of the failure is the poor marketing.  Where do you see them advertised?  When can you actually pick up and hold one?  IF you find them at places like Best Buy, they are locked down, the stylus is missing, and the sales people haven&#039;t a clue what they are.  Who would buy one?

I can&#039;t tell you the number of times I could have sold mine on the spot. I&#039;ve literally held an impromptu &quot;mini-demo&quot; of my tablet at the TSA security line in several airports to agents (&quot;I WANT one like that; where do I get it?!?&quot;), countless airline passengers and flight attendants and a host of others.  Reading, note-taking during meetings, magazine reading (Zinio), movie watching, sales presentations at the restaurant tablet, actually getting work done in cramped, cattle-class seats in airplanes, the list goes on.

So yes, I&#039;d love to see Apple come out with a touch/digitized Mac.  Perhpas with their PR savvy, they could finally help people discover the  convenience these crazy little machines offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would love to see some kind of touch device.  I sit here reading this column on my TC1100 (a tablet/hybrid that Apple should have made, it&#8217;s so elegant).</p>
<p>I think a big part of the failure is the poor marketing.  Where do you see them advertised?  When can you actually pick up and hold one?  IF you find them at places like Best Buy, they are locked down, the stylus is missing, and the sales people haven&#8217;t a clue what they are.  Who would buy one?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t tell you the number of times I could have sold mine on the spot. I&#8217;ve literally held an impromptu &#8220;mini-demo&#8221; of my tablet at the TSA security line in several airports to agents (&#8220;I WANT one like that; where do I get it?!?&#8221;), countless airline passengers and flight attendants and a host of others.  Reading, note-taking during meetings, magazine reading (Zinio), movie watching, sales presentations at the restaurant tablet, actually getting work done in cramped, cattle-class seats in airplanes, the list goes on.</p>
<p>So yes, I&#8217;d love to see Apple come out with a touch/digitized Mac.  Perhpas with their PR savvy, they could finally help people discover the  convenience these crazy little machines offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woadan</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Woadan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1252#comment-787</guid>
		<description>I think the issue is two-fold when it comes to touchscreen PCs.

The first is price. In order to make a decent touchscrren-based laptop, you have a much more expensive screen than you otherwsie would. And when price point makes a difference, you see lesser hardware being used to keep that down. (Or you see a very expensive one otherwise.) When all is said and done, the screen is going to be one of the most expensive components of the device, and most people want a lower pricepoint than the components will allow. I think the proof of the pudding is in the popularity of the Eee type PCs. Like their UMPC cousins, they are small in size. But the pricepoint different is very high. In the end, I think people mostly want something small and portable, and with a portable price to go along with it.

The second issue is one of familiarity. For better or for worse, the QWERTY keyboard has been with us for over a century. It&#039;s like a worn old pair of shoes-it&#039;s comfortable (in its own way) and it&#039;s familiar. Getting people past that paradigm has to be done in a way in which they will say &quot;I wonder how we ever did this before!&quot; And while the Vista version of Tablet PCs is an improvement over the XP 2005 Tablet edition, it still leaves something to be desired, even for enthusiasts.

I think for a touch-enabled PC, you need a serious revision of the OS. heavy OS&#039;s like Vista or even OS X have a lot of built-in things that aren&#039;t typically needed, or are at least unwanted, for a computer that at least purports to be a mobile one. Battery life is important for these machines, and they have failed so far in this respect because they either require expensive additional batteries that also add weight, or the installed/included battery lasts for 3 hours before needing a recharge.

If Apple or microsoft want to build a touchscreen PC, they need to build an OS from the ground up to take all of this into account. If they won&#039;t do that, then they should not bother.

Woadan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue is two-fold when it comes to touchscreen PCs.</p>
<p>The first is price. In order to make a decent touchscrren-based laptop, you have a much more expensive screen than you otherwsie would. And when price point makes a difference, you see lesser hardware being used to keep that down. (Or you see a very expensive one otherwise.) When all is said and done, the screen is going to be one of the most expensive components of the device, and most people want a lower pricepoint than the components will allow. I think the proof of the pudding is in the popularity of the Eee type PCs. Like their UMPC cousins, they are small in size. But the pricepoint different is very high. In the end, I think people mostly want something small and portable, and with a portable price to go along with it.</p>
<p>The second issue is one of familiarity. For better or for worse, the QWERTY keyboard has been with us for over a century. It&#8217;s like a worn old pair of shoes-it&#8217;s comfortable (in its own way) and it&#8217;s familiar. Getting people past that paradigm has to be done in a way in which they will say &#8220;I wonder how we ever did this before!&#8221; And while the Vista version of Tablet PCs is an improvement over the XP 2005 Tablet edition, it still leaves something to be desired, even for enthusiasts.</p>
<p>I think for a touch-enabled PC, you need a serious revision of the OS. heavy OS&#8217;s like Vista or even OS X have a lot of built-in things that aren&#8217;t typically needed, or are at least unwanted, for a computer that at least purports to be a mobile one. Battery life is important for these machines, and they have failed so far in this respect because they either require expensive additional batteries that also add weight, or the installed/included battery lasts for 3 hours before needing a recharge.</p>
<p>If Apple or microsoft want to build a touchscreen PC, they need to build an OS from the ground up to take all of this into account. If they won&#8217;t do that, then they should not bother.</p>
<p>Woadan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S.</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1252#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Perhaps, I&#039;m crazy here, but a very very slim mac touch might make sense in the way that iPhone does. I&#039;ve become very interested in this idea of an iPhone that is twice as long and twice as wide. A 960x640 pixel screen would give a much stronger web browsing experience and allow for even greater applications. I can think of a lot of interesting creative media applications that could use that kind of digital whiteboard, even without the extreme accuracy of a touch stylus. As for the keyboard, I don&#039;t see why it&#039;s unreasonable to expect that with such a product if you touched a text field in any application, a little keyboard would slide right up just like the iPhone. *Except* that it would be big enough that you could foreseeably use two hands to type on it, kind of like the small but usable keyboard in the Eee PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, I&#8217;m crazy here, but a very very slim mac touch might make sense in the way that iPhone does. I&#8217;ve become very interested in this idea of an iPhone that is twice as long and twice as wide. A 960&#215;640 pixel screen would give a much stronger web browsing experience and allow for even greater applications. I can think of a lot of interesting creative media applications that could use that kind of digital whiteboard, even without the extreme accuracy of a touch stylus. As for the keyboard, I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s unreasonable to expect that with such a product if you touched a text field in any application, a little keyboard would slide right up just like the iPhone. *Except* that it would be big enough that you could foreseeably use two hands to type on it, kind of like the small but usable keyboard in the Eee PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/08/26/why-apple-shouldnt-and-probably-wont-release-a-touch-screen-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1252#comment-774</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;m not looking for a mac touch or the like, one way they could handle the keyboard issue is to have a slide out. When engaged the on-screen keyboard would be disabled. With a 13 inch screen this would be doable IMHO. As far as a use of this product, I have a hard time coming up with a mass use function. Would be nice if used like a book that could be propped for reading recipes, viewing diagrams and the like. But for day in and day out usage, no one would sell enough to make it a viable product. Although I&#039;m sure if Apple did it, fanboys and girls would buy one just to say they have one. Before anyone thinks I&#039;m an apple hater, I have a MBP, TC, APE, APX, 2 iphones, nano and a shuffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m not looking for a mac touch or the like, one way they could handle the keyboard issue is to have a slide out. When engaged the on-screen keyboard would be disabled. With a 13 inch screen this would be doable IMHO. As far as a use of this product, I have a hard time coming up with a mass use function. Would be nice if used like a book that could be propped for reading recipes, viewing diagrams and the like. But for day in and day out usage, no one would sell enough to make it a viable product. Although I&#8217;m sure if Apple did it, fanboys and girls would buy one just to say they have one. Before anyone thinks I&#8217;m an apple hater, I have a MBP, TC, APE, APX, 2 iphones, nano and a shuffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
