<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPod Nano: The Technologizer Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/12/new-ipod-nano-the-technologizer-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/12/new-ipod-nano-the-technologizer-review/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fifth-Generation iPod Nano: The Technologizer Review&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/12/new-ipod-nano-the-technologizer-review/comment-page-1/#comment-25539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fifth-Generation iPod Nano: The Technologizer Review&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1831#comment-25539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] music player isn&#8217;t about aesthetics&#8211;in fact, the new Nano is the same size as the old one and differs visually only its slightly larger screen and slightly smaller clickwheel, the camera on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] music player isn&#8217;t about aesthetics&#8211;in fact, the new Nano is the same size as the old one and differs visually only its slightly larger screen and slightly smaller clickwheel, the camera on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bower</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/12/new-ipod-nano-the-technologizer-review/comment-page-1/#comment-25112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Bower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1831#comment-25112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im having some issues reading this blog through RSS in the past day, any reason why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im having some issues reading this blog through RSS in the past day, any reason why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bower</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/12/new-ipod-nano-the-technologizer-review/comment-page-1/#comment-25111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Bower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1831#comment-25111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great blog, reading it through RSS feed as well]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, reading it through RSS feed as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is There an iPod Shortage? Apparently!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/12/new-ipod-nano-the-technologizer-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is There an iPod Shortage? Apparently!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1831#comment-5686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A spotty supply of even a few iPod models suggests that Apple&#8217;s music players continue to sell briskly, which makes for an interesting contrast with this BusinessWeek story which speaks of the possibility that iPod sales may be down this quarter for the first time ever. Even if Apple has a merry Christmas iPodwise, the gist of the BW article is surely on target: Most of the folks who want iPods have them, and it&#8217;s going to get harder and harder for Apple to come up with new models that make for tempting upgrades. For instance, I can&#8217;t imagine that many owners of third-generation iPods Nano have felt much of an urge to splurge on the fourth-generation version. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A spotty supply of even a few iPod models suggests that Apple&#8217;s music players continue to sell briskly, which makes for an interesting contrast with this BusinessWeek story which speaks of the possibility that iPod sales may be down this quarter for the first time ever. Even if Apple has a merry Christmas iPodwise, the gist of the BW article is surely on target: Most of the folks who want iPods have them, and it&#8217;s going to get harder and harder for Apple to come up with new models that make for tempting upgrades. For instance, I can&#8217;t imagine that many owners of third-generation iPods Nano have felt much of an urge to splurge on the fourth-generation version. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

