<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple to iPhone Developers: Don&#8217;t Compete With Us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indian exporters</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-7/#comment-102014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indian exporters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 04:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-102014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#039;s behavior is becoming increasingly sketchy when it comes to approving apps. This is troublesome as I am currently working on a app I hope to get on the store. I&#039;m curious to see how much longer hackers put up with this before there is a total backlash from developers. It is certainly making me rethink about creating apps for their devices. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#039;s behavior is becoming increasingly sketchy when it comes to approving apps. This is troublesome as I am currently working on a app I hope to get on the store. I&#039;m curious to see how much longer hackers put up with this before there is a total backlash from developers. It is certainly making me rethink about creating apps for their devices. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy of Tech: How Apple Decides Which Apps Make It Into the App Store&#160;&#124;&#160;Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-77197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy of Tech: How Apple Decides Which Apps Make It Into the App Store&#160;&#124;&#160;Gadgets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-77197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the rejection was that the application duplicates the functionality of iTunes. However, some construe this action as Apple saying, &quot;Don&#8217;t compete with us&quot; &#8212; which could stifle [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the rejection was that the application duplicates the functionality of iTunes. However, some construe this action as Apple saying, &quot;Don&#8217;t compete with us&quot; &#8212; which could stifle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry McCracken on the App Store &#124; Waking Ideas</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-73965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry McCracken on the App Store &#124; Waking Ideas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-73965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Harry McCracken on the App Store   This entry was posted in Link, Uncategorized and tagged googreader. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; that does about cover it. where is home &#8594; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harry McCracken on the App Store   This entry was posted in Link, Uncategorized and tagged googreader. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; that does about cover it. where is home &rarr; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple&#8217;s Encouraging/Discouraging iPhone App Policy Revisions</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-58137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s Encouraging/Discouraging iPhone App Policy Revisions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-58137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Apps which appear confusingly similar to an existing Apple product or advertising theme will be rejected.&#8221; and &#8220;Apps that look similar to apps bundled on the iPhone, including the App Store, iTunes Store, and iBookstore, will be rejected.&#8221; I&#8217;m all for reducing confusion, and it&#8217;s reasonable enough for Apple to prevent other developers from merely cloning Apple apps. Here&#8217;s what leaves me uneasy, though: Apple could use these rules to give itself a monopoly on any product category it chooses. There have been times in the past when this seemed to be the company&#8217;s policy. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Apps which appear confusingly similar to an existing Apple product or advertising theme will be rejected.&#8221; and &#8220;Apps that look similar to apps bundled on the iPhone, including the App Store, iTunes Store, and iBookstore, will be rejected.&#8221; I&#8217;m all for reducing confusion, and it&#8217;s reasonable enough for Apple to prevent other developers from merely cloning Apple apps. Here&#8217;s what leaves me uneasy, though: Apple could use these rules to give itself a monopoly on any product category it chooses. There have been times in the past when this seemed to be the company&#8217;s policy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has Apple Leveled the iPhone Playing Field? Maybe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-54783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Has Apple Leveled the iPhone Playing Field? Maybe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-54783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] aims to compete with its own apps. The examples started soon after the App Store opened (Apple told the developer of a podcasting app it nixed that it wasn&#8217;t allowed to duplicate iTunes fun...) and most famously include the company&#8217;s refusal to approve the Google Voice app on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aims to compete with its own apps. The examples started soon after the App Store opened (Apple told the developer of a podcasting app it nixed that it wasn&#8217;t allowed to duplicate iTunes fun&#8230;) and most famously include the company&#8217;s refusal to approve the Google Voice app on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The iPhone&#8217;s (Semi) Level Playing Field</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-54775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The iPhone&#8217;s (Semi) Level Playing Field]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-54775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] aims to compete with its own apps. The examples started soon after the App Store opened (Apple told the developer of a podcasting app it nixed that it wasn&#8217;t allowed to duplicate iTunes fun...) and most famously include the company&#8217;s refusal to approve the Google Voice app on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aims to compete with its own apps. The examples started soon after the App Store opened (Apple told the developer of a podcasting app it nixed that it wasn&#8217;t allowed to duplicate iTunes fun&#8230;) and most famously include the company&#8217;s refusal to approve the Google Voice app on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memoer.net &#187; &#187; technologizers-most-of-2008</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-46498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[memoer.net &#187; &#187; technologizers-most-of-2008]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-46498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Most Frustrating Thing About an Otherwise Exceptional Platform. Apple&#8217;s denial of admission into the iTunes App Store for some worthy iPhone apps on the grounds that they compete with Apple products. The company has cleared up much of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most Frustrating Thing About an Otherwise Exceptional Platform. Apple&#8217;s denial of admission into the iTunes App Store for some worthy iPhone apps on the grounds that they compete with Apple products. The company has cleared up much of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; iPhone 3g</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-24491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; iPhone 3g]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-24491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those iPhone App Reviews that users can install on their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those iPhone App Reviews that users can install on their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections&#160;&#124;&#160;iPhone x 3</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-24404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections&#160;&#124;&#160;iPhone x 3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-24404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; MacRevu</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-24387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; MacRevu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-24387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

