<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple to iPhone Developers: Don&#8217;t Compete With Us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; iPhone 3g</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-24491</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; iPhone 3g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-24491</guid>
		<description>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those iPhone App Reviews that users can install on their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those iPhone App Reviews that users can install on their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections&#160;&#124;&#160;iPhone x 3</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-24404</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections&#160;&#124;&#160;iPhone x 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-24404</guid>
		<description>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; MacRevu</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-24387</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind 10 eyebrow-raising App Store rejections &#124; MacRevu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-24387</guid>
		<description>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejection led to outcry on the Web, as comparisons were drawn between software bundled with Mac OS X and those applications that users can install on their Macs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcaster: It&#8217;s about the Store, stupid &#8211; bonaldi.me</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-6/#comment-22137</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcaster: It&#8217;s about the Store, stupid &#8211; bonaldi.me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-22137</guid>
		<description>[...] reckons this makes the iPhone an unreliable platform. Harry McCraken says, why, this could have killed Photoshop! Chuqui doesn&#8217;t get it. Even Gruber says it&#8217;s either a disaster or proof the process is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reckons this makes the iPhone an unreliable platform. Harry McCraken says, why, this could have killed Photoshop! Chuqui doesn&#8217;t get it. Even Gruber says it&#8217;s either a disaster or proof the process is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To infinity, and beyond! &#171; Maxine Tham&#8217;s filthy digital skid mark</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-5/#comment-16544</link>
		<dc:creator>To infinity, and beyond! &#171; Maxine Tham&#8217;s filthy digital skid mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-16544</guid>
		<description>[...] put on their Apps Store. If you are interested in this App Store shenanigans check out this and this. It seems to me that Google are foregrounding produsage even though they are a commercial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] put on their Apps Store. If you are interested in this App Store shenanigans check out this and this. It seems to me that Google are foregrounding produsage even though they are a commercial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Lets Alternative Browsers Onto the iPhone. Sort of!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-5/#comment-7635</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Lets Alternative Browsers Onto the iPhone. Sort of!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-7635</guid>
		<description>[...] about Apple&#8217;s capricious iPhone App Store policies has probably been the fact that it&#8217;s rejected some applications on the grounds that they compete with Apple&#8217;s own offerings&#8211;including third-party browsers. Now the company is approving some alternative browsers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Apple&#8217;s capricious iPhone App Store policies has probably been the fact that it&#8217;s rejected some applications on the grounds that they compete with Apple&#8217;s own offerings&#8211;including third-party browsers. Now the company is approving some alternative browsers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the glossolalia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In on the ground floor. - taking a breather</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-5/#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>the glossolalia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In on the ground floor. - taking a breather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>[...] of stuff you won&#8217;t see on the iPhone, as Apple doesn&#8217;t want anyone developing apps that compete with their own suite of apps on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of stuff you won&#8217;t see on the iPhone, as Apple doesn&#8217;t want anyone developing apps that compete with their own suite of apps on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple App Store: Geschäftsmodell mit Tücken &#124; Alles beta</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-5/#comment-7134</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple App Store: Geschäftsmodell mit Tücken &#124; Alles beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-7134</guid>
		<description>[...] Technologizer: Apple to iPhone Developers: Don’t Compete With Us? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technologizer: Apple to iPhone Developers: Don’t Compete With Us? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zacharyc &#187; Why I like the iPhone App Store Model</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-5/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>zacharyc &#187; Why I like the iPhone App Store Model</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>[...] Close Minded [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Close Minded [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple to Podcaster: No App Store for you &#171; ScratchedChalk&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/13/apple-to-iphone-developers-dont-compete-with-us/comment-page-5/#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple to Podcaster: No App Store for you &#171; ScratchedChalk&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1858#comment-2988</guid>
		<description>[...] on Apple&#8217;s current or future plans; without knowing what those might be, of course. As Harry McCracken put it (via Daring Fireball), &#8220;Way back when, if software distribution for the Mac had been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Apple&#8217;s current or future plans; without knowing what those might be, of course. As Harry McCracken put it (via Daring Fireball), &#8220;Way back when, if software distribution for the Mac had been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
