<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slacker G2 Internet Radio Portable: The Technologizer Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: telsiz</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-100612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[telsiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-100612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is incredible and exhaustive! It also outlines my process exactly. Props to you my good man.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is incredible and exhaustive! It also outlines my process exactly. Props to you my good man.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawnny</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-99911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rawnny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-99911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello i am so pleased I found your weblog, I really discovered you by mistake, whereas I was looking out Yahoo for something else 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldenter.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Premium Web Directory&lt;/a&gt; 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello i am so pleased I found your weblog, I really discovered you by mistake, whereas I was looking out Yahoo for something else<br />
<a href="http://www.goldenter.com/" rel="nofollow">Premium Web Directory</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silicone slap watch</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-95965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silicone slap watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-95965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a great honor to have the opportunity to join the discussion of this great blog site! I want to thank for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great honor to have the opportunity to join the discussion of this great blog site! I want to thank for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LED watch store</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-93869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LED watch store]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-93869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is a very nice blog very much interesting especially to all wide readers please come and visit blog often.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a very nice blog very much interesting especially to all wide readers please come and visit blog often.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-37936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-37936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just love Slacker G2 portable radio. I think Slacker is one of the best web radio and music provider. I thinking about to write a review on Slacker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love Slacker G2 portable radio. I think Slacker is one of the best web radio and music provider. I thinking about to write a review on Slacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-11471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-11471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think you&#039;re being totally serious John Hancock, but as for the 80GB idea, the Salcker doesn&#039;t store all your music at all times, it stores something like a few hundred songs per channel at a time.

If you really have 4000 songs in mind that you want to listen to, it&#039;s probably not for you, and I would submit your particular market segment is unique enough to be unservable-- &#039;I want 4000 songs but I don&#039;t want to pay for them.&#039;

I personally love Slacker, it doesn&#039;t have the broadest selection in the world or the uncanny ability of Pandora. But it&#039;s portable, and easy to use. I am loving it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re being totally serious John Hancock, but as for the 80GB idea, the Salcker doesn&#8217;t store all your music at all times, it stores something like a few hundred songs per channel at a time.</p>
<p>If you really have 4000 songs in mind that you want to listen to, it&#8217;s probably not for you, and I would submit your particular market segment is unique enough to be unservable&#8211; &#8216;I want 4000 songs but I don&#8217;t want to pay for them.&#8217;</p>
<p>I personally love Slacker, it doesn&#8217;t have the broadest selection in the world or the uncanny ability of Pandora. But it&#8217;s portable, and easy to use. I am loving it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slacker&#8217;s iPhone Music App Gives Pandora a Run For Its Money&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-7637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slacker&#8217;s iPhone Music App Gives Pandora a Run For Its Money&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-7637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]   Slacker, the nifty personalized online radio service that&#8217;s available on the Web and on a dedicated portable player, is making its way onto phones. Last week at CES, the company released a version that runs on most [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Slacker, the nifty personalized online radio service that&#8217;s available on the Web and on a dedicated portable player, is making its way onto phones. Last week at CES, the company released a version that runs on most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hancock</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hancock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am working on a music research project to eventually build a music library to compliment my existing 200 CD collection.

Using a public library book, I entered the names of over 800 rock musicians for the period covering 1958 -2002 on an Excel spreadsheet. I then listened to thousands of songs on the free version of Napster creating a &quot;buy list.&quot; 

Once completed, I anticipate the buy list will in the neighborhood of 4,000 songs. My original plan to become a Napster subscriber, download the songs onto my computer and purchase an MP3 player so that the songs could be heard at home or in the car.

Then I learned that if you don&#039;t purchase each song for $0.99, what I wanted to do was not achievable. I can&#039;t justify a $4,000 expenditure given the extreme chaos occurring in the investment world.

Recently, I tuned in to Slacker. One aspect of it that I have not seen discussed is how to get them to play the longer playing instrumental versions of rock music?

I consistently hear the top 40 version of many songs not the longer combined vocal/instrumental versions that I favor. 

Based on my research the number of songs dictates needing a playback unit 80GB, or better, as my musical interests tend toward the longer playing tracks. I have the additional 2,000 songs on the 200 CD collection presently owned to contend with making the total collection some 6,000 songs.

Your review indicates the largest unit available Slacker unit is 8GB. In view of my requirements for a sizeable library how do you utilize Slacker or an alternative service to achieve the objective of a 6,000 song, 80GB unit and not have to pay $4,000 for the songs themselves?

I am also wondering once the &quot;buy list&quot; is more complete whether sending it to Slacker in an attempt to see how many of these songs are in their library would convince me this is the route to go?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a music research project to eventually build a music library to compliment my existing 200 CD collection.</p>
<p>Using a public library book, I entered the names of over 800 rock musicians for the period covering 1958 -2002 on an Excel spreadsheet. I then listened to thousands of songs on the free version of Napster creating a &#8220;buy list.&#8221; </p>
<p>Once completed, I anticipate the buy list will in the neighborhood of 4,000 songs. My original plan to become a Napster subscriber, download the songs onto my computer and purchase an MP3 player so that the songs could be heard at home or in the car.</p>
<p>Then I learned that if you don&#8217;t purchase each song for $0.99, what I wanted to do was not achievable. I can&#8217;t justify a $4,000 expenditure given the extreme chaos occurring in the investment world.</p>
<p>Recently, I tuned in to Slacker. One aspect of it that I have not seen discussed is how to get them to play the longer playing instrumental versions of rock music?</p>
<p>I consistently hear the top 40 version of many songs not the longer combined vocal/instrumental versions that I favor. </p>
<p>Based on my research the number of songs dictates needing a playback unit 80GB, or better, as my musical interests tend toward the longer playing tracks. I have the additional 2,000 songs on the 200 CD collection presently owned to contend with making the total collection some 6,000 songs.</p>
<p>Your review indicates the largest unit available Slacker unit is 8GB. In view of my requirements for a sizeable library how do you utilize Slacker or an alternative service to achieve the objective of a 6,000 song, 80GB unit and not have to pay $4,000 for the songs themselves?</p>
<p>I am also wondering once the &#8220;buy list&#8221; is more complete whether sending it to Slacker in an attempt to see how many of these songs are in their library would convince me this is the route to go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slacker G2 portable player review (Verdict: Nails its niche, but its hardware days are numbered) &#124; MostReviews.com</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/15/slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slacker G2 portable player review (Verdict: Nails its niche, but its hardware days are numbered) &#124; MostReviews.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Related &#8226; Review: Slacker G2 Personal Radio Player &#8226; Product review - Slacker G2 personal radio [Gadling] &#8226; Lightning Review: Slacker G2 Portable Radio [Gizmodo] &#8226; Slacker G2 Personal Radio Player [PCMag] &#8226; Slacker G2 Internet Radio Portable: The Technologizer Review&#8221;&gt;Technologizer] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related &bull; Review: Slacker G2 Personal Radio Player &bull; Product review &#8211; Slacker G2 personal radio [Gadling] &bull; Lightning Review: Slacker G2 Portable Radio [Gizmodo] &bull; Slacker G2 Personal Radio Player [PCMag] &bull; Slacker G2 Internet Radio Portable: The Technologizer Review&#8221;&gt;Technologizer] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

