<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Starts to Come Into Focus. Slowly.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ve lo que Dicen™ de Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-3/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ve lo que Dicen™ de Windows 7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Link: Windows 7 M3 Build 6780 pictures (ThninkNext) (via) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: Windows 7 M3 Build 6780 pictures (ThninkNext) (via) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FIKSZ :: K2 Webzine &#187; A Windows 7 és a &#8220;Könyvtárak&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FIKSZ :: K2 Webzine &#187; A Windows 7 és a &#8220;Könyvtárak&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-2789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Forrás: technologizer.com [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Forrás: technologizer.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-2598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 05:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-2598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently our customers downgrade from Vista to XP whan buying Dell laptops. Pitty! My personal XPS works well with Vista SP1, so some hopes for Win7.

Jaak, http://shop.it.ee/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently our customers downgrade from Vista to XP whan buying Dell laptops. Pitty! My personal XPS works well with Vista SP1, so some hopes for Win7.</p>
<p>Jaak, <a href="http://shop.it.ee/" rel="nofollow">http://shop.it.ee/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tz</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-2489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a comment on a comment . . . .
   AxMan, is there something wrong about resisiting (&quot;hating&quot; in your words) a monopoly that has used all sorts of underhanded if not criminal actions to become and maintain that monopoly?
   Additionally Microsoft still has a huge (probably at least 90%) market share, so your complaints seem reflexive and overdefensive.
   I guess recognizing reality is a form of brainwashing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a comment on a comment . . . .<br />
   AxMan, is there something wrong about resisiting (&#8220;hating&#8221; in your words) a monopoly that has used all sorts of underhanded if not criminal actions to become and maintain that monopoly?<br />
   Additionally Microsoft still has a huge (probably at least 90%) market share, so your complaints seem reflexive and overdefensive.<br />
   I guess recognizing reality is a form of brainwashing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-2402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-2402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After using Vista, I&#039;m considering a MAC as my next computer, unless I can find the old software...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After using Vista, I&#8217;m considering a MAC as my next computer, unless I can find the old software&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Sutton</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leon Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-2146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Day: While I do agree with a majority of your statement, let&#039;s be realistic for a moment.  For the power user, uses as such are way more important than what we can do in a paint program with multiple fingers.  We need the ability to safely manipulate our system, manage system resources, cut disk cost, etc.  HOWEVER, to the general computing population -- this includes research paper writers, game players, home money managers, etc. -- these features aren&#039;t important because they generally don&#039;t know about them.

The average user focuses on what&#039;s convenient, not what makes their core system operate.  This cast of individuals is more widely spread  than the cast of power users, system administrators, Web developers, and so on.  The multitasker cast is so minor that Microsoft -- as a smart business -- doesn&#039;t strictly cater to them (myself included).  They&#039;re more concerned with the majority that relies on flashy technologies to make marketing judgments.  If it &#039;looks cool&#039;, they&#039;ll be more likely to snatch it up.

The bottom line is that Microsoft is going to spend more time on progressing technologies -- while they may boil down to simply looking good -- that make the every-day user&#039;s experience more fun and flashy.  When they&#039;ve settled themselves in this endeavor, they&#039;ll refocus their attention on the core structure and operation of Windows.  Until then -- if the day ever comes -- they&#039;ll do what&#039;s strategically correct when it comes to making the almighty dollar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Day: While I do agree with a majority of your statement, let&#8217;s be realistic for a moment.  For the power user, uses as such are way more important than what we can do in a paint program with multiple fingers.  We need the ability to safely manipulate our system, manage system resources, cut disk cost, etc.  HOWEVER, to the general computing population &#8212; this includes research paper writers, game players, home money managers, etc. &#8212; these features aren&#8217;t important because they generally don&#8217;t know about them.</p>
<p>The average user focuses on what&#8217;s convenient, not what makes their core system operate.  This cast of individuals is more widely spread  than the cast of power users, system administrators, Web developers, and so on.  The multitasker cast is so minor that Microsoft &#8212; as a smart business &#8212; doesn&#8217;t strictly cater to them (myself included).  They&#8217;re more concerned with the majority that relies on flashy technologies to make marketing judgments.  If it &#8216;looks cool&#8217;, they&#8217;ll be more likely to snatch it up.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that Microsoft is going to spend more time on progressing technologies &#8212; while they may boil down to simply looking good &#8212; that make the every-day user&#8217;s experience more fun and flashy.  When they&#8217;ve settled themselves in this endeavor, they&#8217;ll refocus their attention on the core structure and operation of Windows.  Until then &#8212; if the day ever comes &#8212; they&#8217;ll do what&#8217;s strategically correct when it comes to making the almighty dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Day</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-2046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I hated Vista when it first came out and I love it now, I don&#039;t see the use of making yet ANOTHER Windows OS that doesn&#039;t solve the core issues of computing.
Instead of focusing on adding useless features, they should focus on making their OS a heck of a lot more solid.  For example, they should make programs more as modules that work with the core OS system files, so that the OS system files never ever get overwritten, or modified, or changed.  They should focus on how programs run in memory, and how &quot;end task&quot; will work 100% of the time, and not just sometimes.
I could go on and on.......but I know that these types of things make too much sense for anybody at Microshaft to actually think about.  They&#039;d rather wait until Windows 2023 to put these solid fixes/features into their OS, and for now, just stick to basic stupid crap that isn&#039;t going to make anybody&#039;s life any better.

I say everybody boycott every new Windows OS until they start addressing what REALLY matters in an OS, and not just bells and whistles that too many of us are growing tired of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I hated Vista when it first came out and I love it now, I don&#8217;t see the use of making yet ANOTHER Windows OS that doesn&#8217;t solve the core issues of computing.<br />
Instead of focusing on adding useless features, they should focus on making their OS a heck of a lot more solid.  For example, they should make programs more as modules that work with the core OS system files, so that the OS system files never ever get overwritten, or modified, or changed.  They should focus on how programs run in memory, and how &#8220;end task&#8221; will work 100% of the time, and not just sometimes.<br />
I could go on and on&#8230;&#8230;.but I know that these types of things make too much sense for anybody at Microshaft to actually think about.  They&#8217;d rather wait until Windows 2023 to put these solid fixes/features into their OS, and for now, just stick to basic stupid crap that isn&#8217;t going to make anybody&#8217;s life any better.</p>
<p>I say everybody boycott every new Windows OS until they start addressing what REALLY matters in an OS, and not just bells and whistles that too many of us are growing tired of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITGeek</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-1956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ITGeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-1956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the 1st comment, U3 runs without issue on my Vista Business x64 PC laptop.  Just sayin...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the 1st comment, U3 runs without issue on my Vista Business x64 PC laptop.  Just sayin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verbum &#187; Windows 7.0</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verbum &#187; Windows 7.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-1925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/" rel="nofollow">http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Blog &#187; A limited vista on Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/09/21/win7-comes-into-focus/comment-page-2/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft Blog &#187; A limited vista on Windows 7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=2195#comment-1908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Technologizer blog, meanwhile, Harry McCracken gives an overview of Microsoft&#8217;s nonpublicity efforts on Windows 7, against the backdrop of the verbiage that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Technologizer blog, meanwhile, Harry McCracken gives an overview of Microsoft&#8217;s nonpublicity efforts on Windows 7, against the backdrop of the verbiage that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

