<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s MacBook Event: Lots of Questions, Some Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>Great! Just when I was all set to buy a 17&quot; MB Pro. Now I&#039;ll have to rethink it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Just when I was all set to buy a 17&#8243; MB Pro. Now I&#8217;ll have to rethink it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terkwong</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>terkwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>very much agreed there. firewire is not for the pro. its a consumer tech that&#039;s been around for a long time. I use it for external HDDs and camcorders and file data transfer between macs (target disc mode). target disc mode is very useful if you have a dying HDD that you need to savage without dismantling the computer and loading the OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very much agreed there. firewire is not for the pro. its a consumer tech that&#8217;s been around for a long time. I use it for external HDDs and camcorders and file data transfer between macs (target disc mode). target disc mode is very useful if you have a dying HDD that you need to savage without dismantling the computer and loading the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>re: Firewire, I was startled to watch podcasts from CES last January saying that almost ALL of the new camcorders had forsaken IEEE1394 for USB ports.

Apple seems to be bowing to the inevitable here. Moreover, USB 3 is coming, so I&#039;d look for that to show up in a refresh of the MacBooks next spring or next year about this time.

One other problem in dropping Firewire is that (so far) there doesn&#039;t seem to be a provision to launch &#039;Target Mode&#039; under USB, and the MacBooks don&#039;t have ExpressCard for even adding Firewire. 

re: the GPUs in the MacBook Pro line, it seems like this will be a much bigger deal when &#039;Snow Leopard&#039; comes out, if it includes the promised ability to use some GPU cycles for CPU stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Firewire, I was startled to watch podcasts from CES last January saying that almost ALL of the new camcorders had forsaken IEEE1394 for USB ports.</p>
<p>Apple seems to be bowing to the inevitable here. Moreover, USB 3 is coming, so I&#8217;d look for that to show up in a refresh of the MacBooks next spring or next year about this time.</p>
<p>One other problem in dropping Firewire is that (so far) there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a provision to launch &#8216;Target Mode&#8217; under USB, and the MacBooks don&#8217;t have ExpressCard for even adding Firewire. </p>
<p>re: the GPUs in the MacBook Pro line, it seems like this will be a much bigger deal when &#8216;Snow Leopard&#8217; comes out, if it includes the promised ability to use some GPU cycles for CPU stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>this shift in the macbook with the removal of firewire is a big deal for people who work in creating video or audio...  these new macbooks are designed for people who consume multimedia content rather than produce it.... and the whole Pro logic is bullsh*t if I do say so myself as it&#039;s been around on nearly every single mac (including very non-Pro macs) since it was introduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this shift in the macbook with the removal of firewire is a big deal for people who work in creating video or audio&#8230;  these new macbooks are designed for people who consume multimedia content rather than produce it&#8230;. and the whole Pro logic is bullsh*t if I do say so myself as it&#8217;s been around on nearly every single mac (including very non-Pro macs) since it was introduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thehumanyawn</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3099</link>
		<dc:creator>thehumanyawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3099</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s website shows that the new MBP only comes with one FW800 port, dumping FW400 completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s website shows that the new MBP only comes with one FW800 port, dumping FW400 completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d miss it too. I use it for my Time Machine disk, and it&#039;s been very helpful for running in target mode. The former can be replaced, but the latter is one of those unique features that made the Mac special, and it&#039;s a shame to lose it. Unless there&#039;s another way to do it I don&#039;t know about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d miss it too. I use it for my Time Machine disk, and it&#8217;s been very helpful for running in target mode. The former can be replaced, but the latter is one of those unique features that made the Mac special, and it&#8217;s a shame to lose it. Unless there&#8217;s another way to do it I don&#8217;t know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anders</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/10/14/apples-macbook-event-lots-of-questions-some-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=3034#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>a lot of folks including me use the firewire port. It&#039;s a shame as the Macbook was a great little portable laptop to run with things such as the Digidesign 002 or Apogeee Duet. Now you&#039;ve got to shell out near 2gs for that!  Yikes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of folks including me use the firewire port. It&#8217;s a shame as the Macbook was a great little portable laptop to run with things such as the Digidesign 002 or Apogeee Duet. Now you&#8217;ve got to shell out near 2gs for that!  Yikes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
