Comments on: Ouch: Sprint Hemmoraging Customers, Losses Build

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:23:35 +0000

Not to be nitpicky, but your spelling of the third word in the hed isn’t even close. “Hemorrhaging” is what you want. Fire your spellchecker!

By: nathaniel

nathaniel — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:28:29 +0000

sprint’s customer service used to be horrible, but it has improved tremendously…

they have the fastest of all internet service, but no iphone and the cost of replacing a phone is horrendous… i shouldn’t have to buy insurance for a phone to avoid being punished with a $200 price tag on the cheapest replacement phone.

and a phone shouldn’t be $200 – $400 cheaper for new customers as apposed to current customers…
surely there’s $50 throwaways?

but sprint’s service is top shelf…
newest technology

By: Bill

Bill — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:00:57 +0000

I agree with Scott. Also Sprint has the best data network hands down. I owned an iPhone and I now have the Instinct. I enjoy the Instinct by Sprint more than the iPhone and I rarely have any dropped calls or poor reception. Hum?

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:56:29 +0000

Negative publicity is Sprint’s problem! I’m a customer of Sprint’s and I am very happy with the cellular service and the customer service. Sprint’s customer service is always very helpful and solve my problems quickly. My phone was the Fusic for years, but I just recently switched to the Touch Pro. That phone rocks!

By: Ed Oswald

Ed Oswald — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:05:15 +0000

If I may ask, what is so bad about them? Cellular service? Customer service?

By: Todd

Todd — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:59:58 +0000

Sprint has to be the worst cell company I have ever dealt with. My contract is up in December and I can’t wait to switch.