<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Twelve Greatest Defunct Tech Magazines Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-10237</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-10237</guid>
		<description>What about Electronic Entertainment? And, to be fair, its competitors CD-ROM Today and Multimedia World?

Just &#039;cuz CD-ROMs didn&#039;t change the world the way we thought they would (thank you very much, Mr. Internet), it was a glorious moment when the technology and entertainment worlds first got together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Electronic Entertainment? And, to be fair, its competitors CD-ROM Today and Multimedia World?</p>
<p>Just &#8216;cuz CD-ROMs didn&#8217;t change the world the way we thought they would (thank you very much, Mr. Internet), it was a glorious moment when the technology and entertainment worlds first got together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Pappas</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-9889</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Pappas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-9889</guid>
		<description>Some of your picks were right on (Creative Computing, Compute!, Byte, MacUser).  Many were way off the mark (80/Microcomputing - YUCK!, Computer Gaming World - always a boring magazine)

You don&#039;t have A.N.A.L.O.G. Computing?  The magazine still has websites devoted to it, continues to be the subject of a fair amount of internet traffic, and after many years a huge cult following.

But thanks for remembering some of the greats.

-LHP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of your picks were right on (Creative Computing, Compute!, Byte, MacUser).  Many were way off the mark (80/Microcomputing &#8211; YUCK!, Computer Gaming World &#8211; always a boring magazine)</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have A.N.A.L.O.G. Computing?  The magazine still has websites devoted to it, continues to be the subject of a fair amount of internet traffic, and after many years a huge cult following.</p>
<p>But thanks for remembering some of the greats.</p>
<p>-LHP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Davis</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>I loved Creative Computing. There were ads by a software company called Beagle Brothers that had 3-line Basic programs that did amazing tricks on the Apple II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Creative Computing. There were ads by a software company called Beagle Brothers that had 3-line Basic programs that did amazing tricks on the Apple II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-7012</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-7012</guid>
		<description>What about RAINBOW, the magazine for the Tandy Color Computer?

Computer Shopper is indeed still around, but I don&#039;t think for long. It really died when Stan Veit sold it to (you guessed it) Ziff-Davis, which purged it of any non-IBM PC content. What pundits it had left have vanished, and in the days of the Web, no dead-tree publication can keep up on ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about RAINBOW, the magazine for the Tandy Color Computer?</p>
<p>Computer Shopper is indeed still around, but I don&#8217;t think for long. It really died when Stan Veit sold it to (you guessed it) Ziff-Davis, which purged it of any non-IBM PC content. What pundits it had left have vanished, and in the days of the Web, no dead-tree publication can keep up on ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Brock</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-6568</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-6568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll chime in with jhota and Lun Esex with kudos for MacWeek. Getting on their comp list was the holy grail in my office. It was a weekly blast of MacWorld Expo and, like my back issues of MacWorld, MacUser and Byte, it&#039;s just too hard to simply pitch them into the recycle bin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll chime in with jhota and Lun Esex with kudos for MacWeek. Getting on their comp list was the holy grail in my office. It was a weekly blast of MacWorld Expo and, like my back issues of MacWorld, MacUser and Byte, it&#8217;s just too hard to simply pitch them into the recycle bin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Contextless Links of 2008 &#124; jordoncooper.com</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-7/#comment-6498</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Contextless Links of 2008 &#124; jordoncooper.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-6498</guid>
		<description>[...] The Twelve Greatest Defunct Tech Magazines Ever  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Twelve Greatest Defunct Tech Magazines Ever  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-7/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-6409</guid>
		<description>You should do a list of the WORST defunct tech magazines of all time. You could start with Time Inc.&#039;s trio of big budget flops: On, Time Digital, Business 2.0, and go from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should do a list of the WORST defunct tech magazines of all time. You could start with Time Inc.&#8217;s trio of big budget flops: On, Time Digital, Business 2.0, and go from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Leyenberger</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-7/#comment-6343</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Leyenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-6343</guid>
		<description>Harry:
Nice read! As someone who got their start at Creative Computinmg in the early 1980s and went on to write for A.N.A.L.O.G., ST-Log, Compute!, and lastly PC-Laptop, I remember those early days as especially exciting. I read every Creative, BYTE and Pop Electronics issue cover to cover for many years. Thanks for the flash-back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry:<br />
Nice read! As someone who got their start at Creative Computinmg in the early 1980s and went on to write for A.N.A.L.O.G., ST-Log, Compute!, and lastly PC-Laptop, I remember those early days as especially exciting. I read every Creative, BYTE and Pop Electronics issue cover to cover for many years. Thanks for the flash-back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ariel wollinger</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-7/#comment-6215</link>
		<dc:creator>ariel wollinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-6215</guid>
		<description>What? no NEXT GENERATION???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? no NEXT GENERATION???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/11/20/the-twelve-greatest-defunct-tech-magazines-ever/comment-page-7/#comment-6125</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.wordpress.com/?p=4112#comment-6125</guid>
		<description>&quot;Compute! was sold to Bob Guccione’s General Media, thereby becoming a sister publication of Penthouse. If there have been two more utterly different magazines in publishing history, I’m fogetting about them right now.&quot;

Actually, if you think about it, Penthouse and Compute! are very similar magazines. Those type-in program listings are about as close as you can get to soft porn for the teenaged computer nerd.

They served the same purpose, but for different audiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Compute! was sold to Bob Guccione’s General Media, thereby becoming a sister publication of Penthouse. If there have been two more utterly different magazines in publishing history, I’m fogetting about them right now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, if you think about it, Penthouse and Compute! are very similar magazines. Those type-in program listings are about as close as you can get to soft porn for the teenaged computer nerd.</p>
<p>They served the same purpose, but for different audiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
