<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iFrauds: The Fakest iPods Ever!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: freebie jeebies</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-59111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freebie jeebies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-59111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These obviously aren&#039;t meant to be replicas of Apple products are they?  Surely everyone in who&#039;s not living in a cave can tell they are not originals, surely they are just meant to be MP3 players in their own rights that vaguely resemble Apple products? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These obviously aren&#039;t meant to be replicas of Apple products are they?  Surely everyone in who&#039;s not living in a cave can tell they are not originals, surely they are just meant to be MP3 players in their own rights that vaguely resemble Apple products? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agel</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-48118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-48118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your idea. I like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your idea. I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-44787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 05:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-44787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No fake Zunes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No fake Zunes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared "tanning lotion" Timmers</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-44565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared "tanning lotion" Timmers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 07:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-44565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know about being scared by a phone.  I mean, really, what&#039;s the worst that could happen? --- call eves-dropping by a sinister gang that manufactured knockoffs for the purpose of identity theft?

In my field, doing quality checks for tanning salon beds, I have seen numerous knockoff designer tanning lotions that, when tested, didn&#039;t have any of the claimed SPF protection against UV light needed by frequent tanning enthusiasts.

A knockoff in certain categories of products is scary for a reason, it can literally HARM a person&#039;s health.

While I understand and sympathize with the concern for knockoff products in technology, remember that other products outside of purses and cellphones can have a less glamorized impact on each of us if not checked.

Cheers,
Jared]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about being scared by a phone.  I mean, really, what&#8217;s the worst that could happen? &#8212; call eves-dropping by a sinister gang that manufactured knockoffs for the purpose of identity theft?</p>
<p>In my field, doing quality checks for tanning salon beds, I have seen numerous knockoff designer tanning lotions that, when tested, didn&#8217;t have any of the claimed SPF protection against UV light needed by frequent tanning enthusiasts.</p>
<p>A knockoff in certain categories of products is scary for a reason, it can literally HARM a person&#8217;s health.</p>
<p>While I understand and sympathize with the concern for knockoff products in technology, remember that other products outside of purses and cellphones can have a less glamorized impact on each of us if not checked.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jared</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Not to Buy a Phony Apple iPhone &#124; Find Tech News</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-44244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Not to Buy a Phony Apple iPhone &#124; Find Tech News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-44244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of 2008, I went to a sketchy sale and snapped photos of a bevy of cheesy iPod knockoffs. The slideshow I published went on to be one of Technologizer’s most popular stories to date. This weekend, I was in Santa [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of 2008, I went to a sketchy sale and snapped photos of a bevy of cheesy iPod knockoffs. The slideshow I published went on to be one of Technologizer’s most popular stories to date. This weekend, I was in Santa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shopping for an iPhoney</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-44039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shopping for an iPhoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-44039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of 2008, I went to a sketchy sale and snapped photos of a bevy of cheesy iPod knockoffs. The slideshow I published went on to be one of Technologizer&#8217;s most popular stories to date. This weekend, I was in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of 2008, I went to a sketchy sale and snapped photos of a bevy of cheesy iPod knockoffs. The slideshow I published went on to be one of Technologizer&#8217;s most popular stories to date. This weekend, I was in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shovan</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-41607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shovan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-41607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey cjs, when you started modding, programming, and building electronics, did you miss every English class?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey cjs, when you started modding, programming, and building electronics, did you miss every English class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: games</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-9/#comment-41182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[games]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-41182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[even among other cameraphones. When I’ve used photos from my 3G on Technologizer, I’ve apologized in advance, and people still]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even among other cameraphones. When I’ve used photos from my 3G on Technologizer, I’ve apologized in advance, and people still</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobs Calls Out Android Over Porn — Think Geek Australia</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-39717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jobs Calls Out Android Over Porn — Think Geek Australia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 04:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-39717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A Fast-Forward Tour of Gadget History [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Fast-Forward Tour of Gadget History [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neoqueto</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/22/ifrauds-the-fakest-ipods-ever/comment-page-8/#comment-32899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neoqueto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5745#comment-32899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol Jumbo? The future of minimalisation. Fisher is full of win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol Jumbo? The future of minimalisation. Fisher is full of win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

