<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long URL Please Makes a Lot of Sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spammb</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-7223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spammb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5882#comment-7223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The webapp kindurl (http://kindurl.com) was created for the same purpose. It takes longURLs and makes prettified URLs. Very similar to tinyurl but gives context about where the url redirects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The webapp kindurl (<a href="http://kindurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://kindurl.com</a>) was created for the same purpose. It takes longURLs and makes prettified URLs. Very similar to tinyurl but gives context about where the url redirects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-6669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5882#comment-6669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;With all it’s security flaws, I just don’t understand why anybody still uses it.&quot;

Last week Microsoft released a patch within 2 days. Firefox took 3 months to patch a similar vulnerability earlier this year. And yes it was being actively exploited.

I use FireFox, but with caution.

Yes Firefox has NoScript which helps no end, but most people who have no interest in technology don&#039;t want to be dealing with having to turn on JavaScript all the time. IE8 is shaping up to be quite a nice browser, and I would switch if it wasn&#039;t for Ad-block+.

If I were Microsoft I would release IE8 with an Ad-Blocker, one that blocks Google&#039;s ads. That would probably be illegal in some way (even though AdBlock+ isn&#039;t) but it would be an interesting way of competing ;)


Oh, and tiny URL lets you prefix it with the preview sub-domain which is nice. This can be set to the default behaviour via a cookie.

Marc
&quot;I used to be a Mac fanboy. But I saw the light.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With all it’s security flaws, I just don’t understand why anybody still uses it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last week Microsoft released a patch within 2 days. Firefox took 3 months to patch a similar vulnerability earlier this year. And yes it was being actively exploited.</p>
<p>I use FireFox, but with caution.</p>
<p>Yes Firefox has NoScript which helps no end, but most people who have no interest in technology don&#8217;t want to be dealing with having to turn on JavaScript all the time. IE8 is shaping up to be quite a nice browser, and I would switch if it wasn&#8217;t for Ad-block+.</p>
<p>If I were Microsoft I would release IE8 with an Ad-Blocker, one that blocks Google&#8217;s ads. That would probably be illegal in some way (even though AdBlock+ isn&#8217;t) but it would be an interesting way of competing ;)</p>
<p>Oh, and tiny URL lets you prefix it with the preview sub-domain which is nice. This can be set to the default behaviour via a cookie.</p>
<p>Marc<br />
&#8220;I used to be a Mac fanboy. But I saw the light.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Oswald</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-6658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Oswald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5882#comment-6658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darragh - no problem. Hat tip to you on a good idea (surprised nobody has done this yet!)

Jeff - yeah, but about 70% of internet users still haven&#039;t seen the light :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darragh &#8211; no problem. Hat tip to you on a good idea (surprised nobody has done this yet!)</p>
<p>Jeff &#8211; yeah, but about 70% of internet users still haven&#8217;t seen the light :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5882#comment-6606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point about not knowing where tiny url&#039;s go, but really I couldn&#039;t care less about IE users. With all it&#039;s security flaws, I just don&#039;t understand why anybody still uses it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about not knowing where tiny url&#8217;s go, but really I couldn&#8217;t care less about IE users. With all it&#8217;s security flaws, I just don&#8217;t understand why anybody still uses it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darragh Curran</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/23/long-url-please-makes-a-lot-of-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-6604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darragh Curran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5882#comment-6604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ed for the write up (and ajaxian for creating an audience).

You&#039;ve highlighted the security issues with short urls - for me the biggest win is I can more quickly decide if a link in a tweet is something that I&#039;m prepared to click. And if I click it and am disappointed, at least it wasn&#039;t on the basis of potluck!

Cheers,
Darragh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ed for the write up (and ajaxian for creating an audience).</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve highlighted the security issues with short urls &#8211; for me the biggest win is I can more quickly decide if a link in a tweet is something that I&#8217;m prepared to click. And if I click it and am disappointed, at least it wasn&#8217;t on the basis of potluck!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Darragh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

