<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fry&#8217;s Pilferage Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2008/12/24/frys-pilferage-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/24/frys-pilferage-problem/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard P. Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/24/frys-pilferage-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard P. Schmitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5898#comment-7098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Retail Security Survey, November 2002, http://www.jrrobertssecurity.com/security-news/security-crime-news0024.htm, stated that employee theft accounted for 48.5% of inventory shrinkage at the retail level compared to 31.7% from shoplifting.

  Sad.  Brings into question why a retailer would want to annoy customers by checking bags at exit.

Richard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Retail Security Survey, November 2002, <a href="http://www.jrrobertssecurity.com/security-news/security-crime-news0024.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jrrobertssecurity.com/security-news/security-crime-news0024.htm</a>, stated that employee theft accounted for 48.5% of inventory shrinkage at the retail level compared to 31.7% from shoplifting.</p>
<p>  Sad.  Brings into question why a retailer would want to annoy customers by checking bags at exit.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry McCracken</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/24/frys-pilferage-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-6703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry McCracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5898#comment-6703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave: The door guards may indeed check for items rung up at lower prices, but they typically count the number of items in my bag, or pretend to, so I assume they&#039;re also checking for &quot;purchases&quot; that were never rung up at all.

I do tend to stop for the kabuki, but I long ago learned that if the cashier forgets to deactivate anti-shoplifting tags on an item (or you set off alarms for other reasons) there&#039;s no reason to stop at the door. Just continue on your merry way,

--Harry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: The door guards may indeed check for items rung up at lower prices, but they typically count the number of items in my bag, or pretend to, so I assume they&#8217;re also checking for &#8220;purchases&#8221; that were never rung up at all.</p>
<p>I do tend to stop for the kabuki, but I long ago learned that if the cashier forgets to deactivate anti-shoplifting tags on an item (or you set off alarms for other reasons) there&#8217;s no reason to stop at the door. Just continue on your merry way,</p>
<p>&#8211;Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/24/frys-pilferage-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-6688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Barnes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 05:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5898#comment-6688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kabuki is designed solely to prevent &quot;your buddy, the cashier&quot; from ringing up an item at an incorrect (lower) price and &quot;passing the savings onto to you&quot;.

There is no other purpose for the door ritual.

You have the legal right to walk straight out the door without participating in the ritual.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kabuki is designed solely to prevent &#8220;your buddy, the cashier&#8221; from ringing up an item at an incorrect (lower) price and &#8220;passing the savings onto to you&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is no other purpose for the door ritual.</p>
<p>You have the legal right to walk straight out the door without participating in the ritual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2008/12/24/frys-pilferage-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-6683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=5898#comment-6683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been avoiding Fry&#039;s for more than 2 years. I buy something from Fry&#039;s only if I can&#039;t find it anywhere else. The prices are not that great, half of the boxes have been opened or returned from a previews buyers. Sales rep are useless even worst, annoying. Fry&#039;s is not what it used to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been avoiding Fry&#8217;s for more than 2 years. I buy something from Fry&#8217;s only if I can&#8217;t find it anywhere else. The prices are not that great, half of the boxes have been opened or returned from a previews buyers. Sales rep are useless even worst, annoying. Fry&#8217;s is not what it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

