<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seven Things Windows 7 Needs To Accomplish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Beta General Availability Delayed&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/comment-page-1/#comment-7421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta General Availability Delayed&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6076#comment-7421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all:&amp;nbspNews   Stretch your legs, go outside, and get fresh air&#8211;the Windows 7 beta is delayed until tomorrow. Windows team blogger Brandon LeBlanc has announced that Windows 7 is such [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all:&#38;nbspNews   Stretch your legs, go outside, and get fresh air&#8211;the Windows 7 beta is delayed until tomorrow. Windows team blogger Brandon LeBlanc has announced that Windows 7 is such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/comment-page-1/#comment-7349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6076#comment-7349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s to hoping it works just like Vista did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping it works just like Vista did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downloading Windows 7 Beta &#124; Jason Slater Technology Blog &#124; Talking Technology</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/comment-page-1/#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Downloading Windows 7 Beta &#124; Jason Slater Technology Blog &#124; Talking Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6076#comment-7329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Seven Things Windows 7 Needs To Accomplish [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Seven Things Windows 7 Needs To Accomplish [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dj Skreem</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/comment-page-1/#comment-7216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dj Skreem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6076#comment-7216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft did not copy apple&#039;s dock, the dock like disign was used in windows fist with the lage icons in windows 1.0 all they did was make the task bar bigger an make the icons large and without lables as defaultin windows 7 or in other words took an old idea they had way back in the day and fused it wit the current task bar an quick launch. It resembles Apple&#039;s dock but it looks nothing like it an works similar but will neva be the same. check the windows 7 blog to see 4 yourself how simmilar the new tskbar is to the one in windows 1.0 at http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/.

I agree with DJ microsoft has done thier home work with windows 7 and if they continue allong the path they took with windows 7, windows 8 will be even better but with 120% more innovation from microsft i hope an taking the new taskbar to a level where i will not be refferd 2 as the mac dock clone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft did not copy apple&#8217;s dock, the dock like disign was used in windows fist with the lage icons in windows 1.0 all they did was make the task bar bigger an make the icons large and without lables as defaultin windows 7 or in other words took an old idea they had way back in the day and fused it wit the current task bar an quick launch. It resembles Apple&#8217;s dock but it looks nothing like it an works similar but will neva be the same. check the windows 7 blog to see 4 yourself how simmilar the new tskbar is to the one in windows 1.0 at <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/</a>.</p>
<p>I agree with DJ microsoft has done thier home work with windows 7 and if they continue allong the path they took with windows 7, windows 8 will be even better but with 120% more innovation from microsft i hope an taking the new taskbar to a level where i will not be refferd 2 as the mac dock clone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/comment-page-1/#comment-7195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6076#comment-7195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed,

Points well taken and well spoken. I am one who decided to take advantage of the planned/unplanned beta leak. 

After 5 days of W7, build 7000, the first thing I can praise MS for is the fact that two of my machines which did not even qualify to run Vista, W7 installed and more importantly is running without a hitch. Now day 6 and not one crash. Here&#039;s something else really cool. One of these machines is a laptop with a mere 1 GB of memory and the OS occupies only 3.5 GB of storage. The pretend or so called &quot;Dock&quot; is lame. It&#039;s lame because it&#039;s just there and really preforms no apparent functional task (maybe that will come later on). Although the cosmetic layout of menus is quite different from XP (never had interest in Vista), the organization of tasks/groups seems to be well thought out. It also appears that MS has taken an initial interest in the customers dissatisfaction with many aspects of Vista. Many have either been eliminated or refined for W7. The UAC has not been annoying as reported with Vista. The UAC has only popped up in W7 when something is affecting the kernel. Installation of my own software has not been a problem. There were some audio driver issues on one machine but they were resolved using released Vista drivers.

Finally, your point of price is right on. Owning many machines; if W7 is going to fly in the market place the price per copy of W7 must come down. I have established alternatives, namely my MAC and Linux running on many machines. Like many other customers, we have other OS choices and we have already exercised those choices. Now, MS needs to market a compelling reason to move to W7. Lastly MS, please don&#039;t bloat this version, nor come back to us with 7 different versions. That concept failed miserably.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Points well taken and well spoken. I am one who decided to take advantage of the planned/unplanned beta leak. </p>
<p>After 5 days of W7, build 7000, the first thing I can praise MS for is the fact that two of my machines which did not even qualify to run Vista, W7 installed and more importantly is running without a hitch. Now day 6 and not one crash. Here&#8217;s something else really cool. One of these machines is a laptop with a mere 1 GB of memory and the OS occupies only 3.5 GB of storage. The pretend or so called &#8220;Dock&#8221; is lame. It&#8217;s lame because it&#8217;s just there and really preforms no apparent functional task (maybe that will come later on). Although the cosmetic layout of menus is quite different from XP (never had interest in Vista), the organization of tasks/groups seems to be well thought out. It also appears that MS has taken an initial interest in the customers dissatisfaction with many aspects of Vista. Many have either been eliminated or refined for W7. The UAC has not been annoying as reported with Vista. The UAC has only popped up in W7 when something is affecting the kernel. Installation of my own software has not been a problem. There were some audio driver issues on one machine but they were resolved using released Vista drivers.</p>
<p>Finally, your point of price is right on. Owning many machines; if W7 is going to fly in the market place the price per copy of W7 must come down. I have established alternatives, namely my MAC and Linux running on many machines. Like many other customers, we have other OS choices and we have already exercised those choices. Now, MS needs to market a compelling reason to move to W7. Lastly MS, please don&#8217;t bloat this version, nor come back to us with 7 different versions. That concept failed miserably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/06/seven-things-windows-7-needs-to-accomplish/comment-page-1/#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6076#comment-7183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#1 on my list would be: Win7 must work on lighter, leaner machines, i.e. netbooks and their desktop brethren. MSFT has a history of trying to get each new version of Windows to work with next year&#039;s hardware; this hurt the company with Vista&#039;s heavy graphics requirements, and MSFT really was caught with its pants down over the netbook revolution.

If not for netbooks, MSFT probably could have killed and buried WinXP last year.

A lighter, leaner Windows would also be extensible down to the smartphone level to give the iPhone and upcoming Android devices some serious competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 on my list would be: Win7 must work on lighter, leaner machines, i.e. netbooks and their desktop brethren. MSFT has a history of trying to get each new version of Windows to work with next year&#8217;s hardware; this hurt the company with Vista&#8217;s heavy graphics requirements, and MSFT really was caught with its pants down over the netbook revolution.</p>
<p>If not for netbooks, MSFT probably could have killed and buried WinXP last year.</p>
<p>A lighter, leaner Windows would also be extensible down to the smartphone level to give the iPhone and upcoming Android devices some serious competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

