<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technologizer Predictions: What Could Be in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lars Ottesen Henriksen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My 2009 predictions quoted on Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7638</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Ottesen Henriksen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My 2009 predictions quoted on Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6633#comment-7638</guid>
		<description>[...] predictions from my 2009 predictions post were just posted on Technologizer - my suggestion about a TV from Apple and my pessimistic prediction regarding Chrome&#8217;s market share&#8230; Nice! One of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] predictions from my 2009 predictions post were just posted on Technologizer &#8211; my suggestion about a TV from Apple and my pessimistic prediction regarding Chrome&#8217;s market share&#8230; Nice! One of my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Forsythe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7587</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Forsythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6633#comment-7587</guid>
		<description>2009 is the year Linux takes over the desktop!

(Repeat annually)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 is the year Linux takes over the desktop!</p>
<p>(Repeat annually)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Winkerbean</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7585</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Winkerbean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6633#comment-7585</guid>
		<description>See that long key on the bottom of your keyboard, there?  It&#039;s called a space bar.  You should learn to use that more consistently.

Spell check wouldn&#039;t kill you, either.

It&#039;s difficult to take something seriously that looks like it was written by an 11 year old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See that long key on the bottom of your keyboard, there?  It&#8217;s called a space bar.  You should learn to use that more consistently.</p>
<p>Spell check wouldn&#8217;t kill you, either.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s difficult to take something seriously that looks like it was written by an 11 year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relyt</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7566</link>
		<dc:creator>Relyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6633#comment-7566</guid>
		<description>Harry, you have to admit you liked my predictions. Just vague fragments like &quot;new mac mini&quot; and &quot;vista will bomb&quot; (Ok, I don&#039;t think I mentioned that last one but still...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry, you have to admit you liked my predictions. Just vague fragments like &#8220;new mac mini&#8221; and &#8220;vista will bomb&#8221; (Ok, I don&#8217;t think I mentioned that last one but still&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoperror</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/12/technologizer-predictions-what-could-be-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7553</link>
		<dc:creator>stoperror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6633#comment-7553</guid>
		<description>“Windows 7 will fail to excite, but meet modest market success as a (late) market replacement for Vista. Microsoft continue to remain a powerhouse in the enterprise but increasingly less relevant in consumer markets.”–D.R. Gardner

I&#039;d have to agree with that to some extent. XP is high ground. A ground in which to topple it, you&#039;d have to do something pretty darn amazing. With Vista, we didn&#039;t get that. We got another ME. With 7, I feel we might get that. But then again, we might not. Some features that were taken out of 7 (most noticable the lack of the classic start menu) are critical to me. I prefer the classic start menu. Be it on 95 or Vista. Again, it might do the EXACT opposite. Remain a powerhouse to the consumer, but become less relevant to the enterprise. Only time can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Windows 7 will fail to excite, but meet modest market success as a (late) market replacement for Vista. Microsoft continue to remain a powerhouse in the enterprise but increasingly less relevant in consumer markets.”–D.R. Gardner</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with that to some extent. XP is high ground. A ground in which to topple it, you&#8217;d have to do something pretty darn amazing. With Vista, we didn&#8217;t get that. We got another ME. With 7, I feel we might get that. But then again, we might not. Some features that were taken out of 7 (most noticable the lack of the classic start menu) are critical to me. I prefer the classic start menu. Be it on 95 or Vista. Again, it might do the EXACT opposite. Remain a powerhouse to the consumer, but become less relevant to the enterprise. Only time can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
