<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here We Go Again &#8211; MicroHoo Search Deal Close?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/01/13/here-we-go-again-microhoo-search-deal-close/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/13/here-we-go-again-microhoo-search-deal-close/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballmer Met With Yahoo Exec This Week&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/13/here-we-go-again-microhoo-search-deal-close/comment-page-1/#comment-7747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ballmer Met With Yahoo Exec This Week&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6709#comment-7747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] seems to confirm the reporting from Tuesday which indicated that Microsoft has proposals ready to present to the Yahoo board any time now. The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to confirm the reporting from Tuesday which indicated that Microsoft has proposals ready to present to the Yahoo board any time now. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom b</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/13/here-we-go-again-microhoo-search-deal-close/comment-page-1/#comment-7629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6709#comment-7629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so the DoJ forbade Yahoo from cementing a search partnership with Google, a company everybody likes-- you think they&#039;ll allow a search deal wuith MSFT, a convicted monopolist? When pigs fly! Google lawyers would have a request for an injunction signed in minutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so the DoJ forbade Yahoo from cementing a search partnership with Google, a company everybody likes&#8211; you think they&#8217;ll allow a search deal wuith MSFT, a convicted monopolist? When pigs fly! Google lawyers would have a request for an injunction signed in minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/13/here-we-go-again-microhoo-search-deal-close/comment-page-1/#comment-7628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=6709#comment-7628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would suck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

