<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conflicting Reports on Jobs&#8217; Whereabouts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/01/27/conflicting-reports-on-jobs-whereabouts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/27/conflicting-reports-on-jobs-whereabouts/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Oswald</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/27/conflicting-reports-on-jobs-whereabouts/comment-page-1/#comment-8391</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Oswald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=7315#comment-8391</guid>
		<description>E-og:
    Thanks for stopping by. While I do agree on your general premise, TG has for the most part stayed off the Jobs&#039; health merry-go-round. My point in this post is that we need to be responsible when trying to &#039;scoop&#039; the competition. 

     Investors do have a right to know however, and I think Apple needs to be forthcoming. Jobs is a huge factor in Apple&#039;s overall success. As long as he is, you will have this constant speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-og:<br />
    Thanks for stopping by. While I do agree on your general premise, TG has for the most part stayed off the Jobs&#8217; health merry-go-round. My point in this post is that we need to be responsible when trying to &#8217;scoop&#8217; the competition. </p>
<p>     Investors do have a right to know however, and I think Apple needs to be forthcoming. Jobs is a huge factor in Apple&#8217;s overall success. As long as he is, you will have this constant speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-og</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/01/27/conflicting-reports-on-jobs-whereabouts/comment-page-1/#comment-8387</link>
		<dc:creator>E-og</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=7315#comment-8387</guid>
		<description>IMHO reporting on a report about a report isn&#039;t fantastic journalism either and only serves to spread the story around. I am a daily reader of Technologizer and I am getting a little frustrated with the provisos that seem to precede any report on Steve Jobs&#039; health. Either report on it or don&#039;t. If the story relates to an Apple press release or something else official, fine, but otherwise I don&#039;t think it deserves to be mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO reporting on a report about a report isn&#8217;t fantastic journalism either and only serves to spread the story around. I am a daily reader of Technologizer and I am getting a little frustrated with the provisos that seem to precede any report on Steve Jobs&#8217; health. Either report on it or don&#8217;t. If the story relates to an Apple press release or something else official, fine, but otherwise I don&#8217;t think it deserves to be mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
