<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flock: Goodbye Mozilla, Hello Chrome?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/flock-goodbye-mozilla-hello-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/flock-goodbye-mozilla-hello-chrome/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flock Gets Even More Social, Contemplates Its Future&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/flock-goodbye-mozilla-hello-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-16242</link>
		<dc:creator>Flock Gets Even More Social, Contemplates Its Future&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8677#comment-16242</guid>
		<description>[...] ready to talk about a Firefox 3.5-based edition of Flock. In fact, when I asked him about rumors from last March that Flock intended to dump Mozilla for Google&#8217;s Chrome platform, he said that everything was up for consideration at this point, including jumping to a new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ready to talk about a Firefox 3.5-based edition of Flock. In fact, when I asked him about rumors from last March that Flock intended to dump Mozilla for Google&#8217;s Chrome platform, he said that everything was up for consideration at this point, including jumping to a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveZatz</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/flock-goodbye-mozilla-hello-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-10380</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveZatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8677#comment-10380</guid>
		<description>yep, I agree with Alan. Not sure I see the value in their browser, which will always trail Firefox or Chrome in the dev cycle. I&#039;ve been running the beta FF 3.1, with new JS rendering, engine for months now. Also, i know ALL FF extensions will work in FF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, I agree with Alan. Not sure I see the value in their browser, which will always trail Firefox or Chrome in the dev cycle. I&#8217;ve been running the beta FF 3.1, with new JS rendering, engine for months now. Also, i know ALL FF extensions will work in FF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Ralph</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/flock-goodbye-mozilla-hello-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-10374</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8677#comment-10374</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I think Flock&#039;s biggest problem has been that you can bolt on most of the extra functionality to Firefox in a couple of minutes, and more importantly customise it to your requirements, whilst still benefiting from Mozilla&#039;s rapid (compared to Microsoft) patching of their browser to counter security issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I think Flock&#8217;s biggest problem has been that you can bolt on most of the extra functionality to Firefox in a couple of minutes, and more importantly customise it to your requirements, whilst still benefiting from Mozilla&#8217;s rapid (compared to Microsoft) patching of their browser to counter security issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
