<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Smartphone is Destined to Replace the PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-2/#comment-98630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-98630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I would like to see you eat your hat i will have to agree. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I would like to see you eat your hat i will have to agree. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hands-On with the Droid RAZR - Techland - TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-2/#comment-96270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hands-On with the Droid RAZR - Techland - TIME.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-96270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] when someone comes up with a laptop dock that can be used with any phone. ( In fact, I&#039;ve been excited about the idea for years, long before LapDocks existed.) I figure there aren&#039;t any fundamental technological [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when someone comes up with a laptop dock that can be used with any phone. ( In fact, I&#039;ve been excited about the idea for years, long before LapDocks existed.) I figure there aren&#039;t any fundamental technological [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the Droid RAZR</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-2/#comment-96088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on the Droid RAZR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-96088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] someone comes up with a laptop dock that can be used with any phone. ( In fact, I&#8217;ve been excited about the idea for years, long before LapDocks existed.) I figure there aren&#8217;t any fundamental technological [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] someone comes up with a laptop dock that can be used with any phone. ( In fact, I&#8217;ve been excited about the idea for years, long before LapDocks existed.) I figure there aren&#8217;t any fundamental technological [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-72607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-72607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The smart phone cannot possibly replace the computer. I think most of us are missing the point. The smart phone is merely the latest evolution of the PC. The only battles to be fought at this point is who will provide the connectivity and who will provide the code.  People have been taking shots at MS for years because they are the gorilla.  It&#039;s the thing to do. Obviously, if MS doesn&#039;t make some quick in-roads, Android may well be the OS of choice for the new PC, that thing we now call a smartphone. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smart phone cannot possibly replace the computer. I think most of us are missing the point. The smart phone is merely the latest evolution of the PC. The only battles to be fought at this point is who will provide the connectivity and who will provide the code.  People have been taking shots at MS for years because they are the gorilla.  It&#039;s the thing to do. Obviously, if MS doesn&#039;t make some quick in-roads, Android may well be the OS of choice for the new PC, that thing we now call a smartphone. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Motorola Atrix 4G: This is Huge</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-72600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Motorola Atrix 4G: This is Huge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 20:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-72600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but I think one of Harry&#8217;s best opinion columns here was the one from May 2009 about how smartphones are destined to replace the PC, and how the comforts of full-sized computing &#8212; keyboard, mouse, monitor &#8212; will become [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but I think one of Harry&#8217;s best opinion columns here was the one from May 2009 about how smartphones are destined to replace the PC, and how the comforts of full-sized computing &#8212; keyboard, mouse, monitor &#8212; will become [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneWebDay: Survey response insight about the Web&#8217;s history and Web use on mobile devices &#171; Shelley Russell&#39;s iMedia blog</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-26371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OneWebDay: Survey response insight about the Web&#8217;s history and Web use on mobile devices &#171; Shelley Russell&#39;s iMedia blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-26371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] computers. The article, titled: “The Smartphone is destined to replace the PC,” is available at http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/. Others argue that while the phasing out of the PC may become a possibility, the trend is currently [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] computers. The article, titled: “The Smartphone is destined to replace the PC,” is available at <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/" rel="nofollow">http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/</a>. Others argue that while the phasing out of the PC may become a possibility, the trend is currently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan harris</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-16857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alan harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-16857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you suppose will replace the smartphone!? The issue is the rate of successive technological obsolescence. I suppose a scientist or other expert has deduced a mathematical formula for this. Assuming, therefore, that technological advancement occurs with growing rapidity over time,then are there barriers to innovation, such that investment in the next stage would be hindered by the inherent or perceived risk that investors/risktakers would/may be deterred from investing for concern that they may not sufficiently recover their investment plus profit? 

One method to discern this would be to go back to when the pc was in its infancy commercially and determine the dynamics of the industry and rate and cost of succeeding replacements in the marketplace. Presumably, due to inherent economic laws, the curve must be rising more steeply in each succeeding &quot;shorter&quot; runs. My own theory is merely complementary to this, namely: &quot;All systems eventually integrate and consolidate over time.&quot; The primary issue being: how long in time does it(succession) eventually/actually take !? {Q: Does &quot;succession&quot; necessarily imply &quot;success?)

My favorite illustration of this concerns the U.S. military organization. I served in the Army as an non-career ROTC officer.However, I couldn&#039;t understand why we had separate armed forces (i.e., performing duplicative missions with different equipment). Thus the Marines and Army had separate ground and air forces. Although the Marines had jets and helicopters, while the Army had fixed wing and helicopters. The Navy has air forces and ships. So does the Coastguard, to a much lesser extent. I always thought that the Coastguard should be folded into and absorbed by the Navy and the various missions carried out within that structure. Similarily, the Army and Marine ground forces should be integrated [in Vietnam, e.g., the Army &amp; Marines conducted joint ops together on many occasions in I. Corps!] The Air Force would absorb all of the other branches flight operations and equipment, with duplication eventually eliminated. Well, to shorten the analysis, I understand that the DOD finally came to this conclusion and, eventually, there&#039;ll be only one ground, air and naval force. &quot;Dat&#039;s&quot; &#039;cause all systems integrate and consolidate over time! No use &quot;fighten-it.&quot; But stupidity reigns by either ignoring or procrastinating about it. Forget the various prides and prejudices between the services!

In closing, one other area badly needs to heed this immutable rule: GOVERNMENT at all levels. In Minnesota, for example,where I reside, we literally have scores of different governments: parks,mosquito control districts, watersheds; cities, towns;counties, metro governmental jurisdictions (with both supervisory and direct powers). We have 90-some counties in this smaller-sized state. Counties are running out of money trying to duplicate systems of separate judicial jurisdictions. And even cities still have their own separate judicial systems! Where are the supposed expert system analysts pointing out and demanding implementation of these immutable scientific principles!? ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT: you better believe IT! It&#039;s just a matter of time!!

Thanks for giving me unlimited space to ventilate!! 

Sincerely,

Alan D. Harris
E.P., MN 55344]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you suppose will replace the smartphone!? The issue is the rate of successive technological obsolescence. I suppose a scientist or other expert has deduced a mathematical formula for this. Assuming, therefore, that technological advancement occurs with growing rapidity over time,then are there barriers to innovation, such that investment in the next stage would be hindered by the inherent or perceived risk that investors/risktakers would/may be deterred from investing for concern that they may not sufficiently recover their investment plus profit? </p>
<p>One method to discern this would be to go back to when the pc was in its infancy commercially and determine the dynamics of the industry and rate and cost of succeeding replacements in the marketplace. Presumably, due to inherent economic laws, the curve must be rising more steeply in each succeeding &#8220;shorter&#8221; runs. My own theory is merely complementary to this, namely: &#8220;All systems eventually integrate and consolidate over time.&#8221; The primary issue being: how long in time does it(succession) eventually/actually take !? {Q: Does &#8220;succession&#8221; necessarily imply &#8220;success?)</p>
<p>My favorite illustration of this concerns the U.S. military organization. I served in the Army as an non-career ROTC officer.However, I couldn&#8217;t understand why we had separate armed forces (i.e., performing duplicative missions with different equipment). Thus the Marines and Army had separate ground and air forces. Although the Marines had jets and helicopters, while the Army had fixed wing and helicopters. The Navy has air forces and ships. So does the Coastguard, to a much lesser extent. I always thought that the Coastguard should be folded into and absorbed by the Navy and the various missions carried out within that structure. Similarily, the Army and Marine ground forces should be integrated [in Vietnam, e.g., the Army &amp; Marines conducted joint ops together on many occasions in I. Corps!] The Air Force would absorb all of the other branches flight operations and equipment, with duplication eventually eliminated. Well, to shorten the analysis, I understand that the DOD finally came to this conclusion and, eventually, there&#8217;ll be only one ground, air and naval force. &#8220;Dat&#8217;s&#8221; &#8217;cause all systems integrate and consolidate over time! No use &#8220;fighten-it.&#8221; But stupidity reigns by either ignoring or procrastinating about it. Forget the various prides and prejudices between the services!</p>
<p>In closing, one other area badly needs to heed this immutable rule: GOVERNMENT at all levels. In Minnesota, for example,where I reside, we literally have scores of different governments: parks,mosquito control districts, watersheds; cities, towns;counties, metro governmental jurisdictions (with both supervisory and direct powers). We have 90-some counties in this smaller-sized state. Counties are running out of money trying to duplicate systems of separate judicial jurisdictions. And even cities still have their own separate judicial systems! Where are the supposed expert system analysts pointing out and demanding implementation of these immutable scientific principles!? ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT: you better believe IT! It&#8217;s just a matter of time!!</p>
<p>Thanks for giving me unlimited space to ventilate!! </p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Alan D. Harris<br />
E.P., MN 55344</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathiastck</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-10357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mathiastck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-10357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moore&#039;s law has not applied so well to mobile because the power requirements have not been reduced at nearly that rate.

I love the idea of using my blackberry curve, G1 or even IPhone has the input device for my PC, TV or mediacenter.  (I want a trackball and a keyboard.).  I&#039;d love to see bluetooth become ubiquitous on PC&#039;s.

Similarly I&#039;d like to use the same A2DP Bluetooth headset for my phone, ipod touch, media center and PC, being able to easily switch which Audio channel I&#039;m listening too.  (Ideally I&#039;d like to be able to listen to multiple bluetooth audio channels at once, and just adjust their volume according to which is more interesting at the moment.).

So, for a lot of users, I see the smartphone just being an important part of a larger web of gadgets.

For some, especially many Japanese, the smartphone is their primary computing device.  So to some extent your prediction has come true.

The PC was basically the only device capable of doing the many tasks it did.  That era is gone, now those tasks are increasingly being taken by our phone, our data storage device, and our high end game console.  Or better yet, the task is shared.  Some emails we deal with completely on our phone, some we read the subject only and put of dealing with the mail more thoroughly until we get to a PC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore&#8217;s law has not applied so well to mobile because the power requirements have not been reduced at nearly that rate.</p>
<p>I love the idea of using my blackberry curve, G1 or even IPhone has the input device for my PC, TV or mediacenter.  (I want a trackball and a keyboard.).  I&#8217;d love to see bluetooth become ubiquitous on PC&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Similarly I&#8217;d like to use the same A2DP Bluetooth headset for my phone, ipod touch, media center and PC, being able to easily switch which Audio channel I&#8217;m listening too.  (Ideally I&#8217;d like to be able to listen to multiple bluetooth audio channels at once, and just adjust their volume according to which is more interesting at the moment.).</p>
<p>So, for a lot of users, I see the smartphone just being an important part of a larger web of gadgets.</p>
<p>For some, especially many Japanese, the smartphone is their primary computing device.  So to some extent your prediction has come true.</p>
<p>The PC was basically the only device capable of doing the many tasks it did.  That era is gone, now those tasks are increasingly being taken by our phone, our data storage device, and our high end game console.  Or better yet, the task is shared.  Some emails we deal with completely on our phone, some we read the subject only and put of dealing with the mail more thoroughly until we get to a PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-10340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[william]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-10340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Along the lines of JonathanPDX, the technology might not be the big issue. The big issue might be people who do not want to be forced to use their cell phone company&#039;s plans and pricing for their computer/internet experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along the lines of JonathanPDX, the technology might not be the big issue. The big issue might be people who do not want to be forced to use their cell phone company&#8217;s plans and pricing for their computer/internet experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/03/02/the-smartphone-is-destined-to-replace-the-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-10339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=8601#comment-10339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait until Adobe Creative Suite is available for the smartphones that replace the PC I am using.  Oh, wait, that won&#039;t happen, and we will still have PCs.

And considering how most smartphones don&#039;t have a full-size keyboard, I really doubt the PC should be relegated so quickly to the garbage heaps.  You look at power and fail to realize there is user interface that needs to be looked at.

Maybe a smartphone dock would resolve this need for real-sized KBs, mice and screens, but I can&#039;t see people spending that kind of money on office workers, especially the vast majority that do not travel.

By the way, did you ever predict we would all be tele-commuting before the end of the 20th century as well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait until Adobe Creative Suite is available for the smartphones that replace the PC I am using.  Oh, wait, that won&#8217;t happen, and we will still have PCs.</p>
<p>And considering how most smartphones don&#8217;t have a full-size keyboard, I really doubt the PC should be relegated so quickly to the garbage heaps.  You look at power and fail to realize there is user interface that needs to be looked at.</p>
<p>Maybe a smartphone dock would resolve this need for real-sized KBs, mice and screens, but I can&#8217;t see people spending that kind of money on office workers, especially the vast majority that do not travel.</p>
<p>By the way, did you ever predict we would all be tele-commuting before the end of the 20th century as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

