<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Apple Tax&#8221; White Paper&#8211;Let&#8217;s Try That Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: [TechBlogWatch] Best of Blogs für den 14. April 2009 &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[TechBlogWatch] Best of Blogs für den 14. April 2009 &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Microsoft’s “Apple Tax” White Paper–Let’s Try That Again! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft’s “Apple Tax” White Paper–Let’s Try That Again! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I am an Apple &quot;fanboy&quot; because I prefer to use a Mac. I have lost many hours, days, weeks, and months trying to get Microsoft products to work for me - I have paid the Microsoft Tax. I confess: I am a Microsoft &quot;hater&quot;. That&#039;s because I do not appreciate poorly designed software that frustrates and infuriates me. I used to be a furniture maker. Using a Mac compared to Windows is like comparing Sears Craftsman tools to Bosch tools - you get what you pay for. According to Joe, there are two kinds of people in the world who don&#039;t use Windows: Microsoft &quot;haters&quot; and Mac &quot;fanboys&quot;. I&#039;ll admit it, I am both. I do not consider either stereotype to be derogatory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I am an Apple &#8220;fanboy&#8221; because I prefer to use a Mac. I have lost many hours, days, weeks, and months trying to get Microsoft products to work for me &#8211; I have paid the Microsoft Tax. I confess: I am a Microsoft &#8220;hater&#8221;. That&#8217;s because I do not appreciate poorly designed software that frustrates and infuriates me. I used to be a furniture maker. Using a Mac compared to Windows is like comparing Sears Craftsman tools to Bosch tools &#8211; you get what you pay for. According to Joe, there are two kinds of people in the world who don&#8217;t use Windows: Microsoft &#8220;haters&#8221; and Mac &#8220;fanboys&#8221;. I&#8217;ll admit it, I am both. I do not consider either stereotype to be derogatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catalina588</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catalina588]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope.  The whitepaper is still rife with unreasonable comparisons.  The Mac spreadsheet is loaded with software burdens the PC should also have.  But the biggest &quot;unreasonable&quot; choice by author Roger Kay is the $2,500 Mac Pro for the occasional gamer and video editor. Instead, a $1,499 new 24&quot; iMac will do the job nicely.  Add Parallels 4.0 for $80 and you can run all that Windows legacy software too so it won;t add to the Mac Tax.  A one-processor Mac Pro is half-baked (it is a dual-processor-capable workstation) and not needed here. Consumers would not look at the Mac Pro in this example as it is out of their budget range, plain and simple.

Finally, I&#039;ll give beta Windows 7 credit for being much better than Vista 1.0.  But comparing tomorrow&#039;s Windows 7 to today&#039;s OS X is unfair too; Apple&#039;s Snow Leopard 10.6 is expected around mid-year, and is the logical OS to compare with Windows 7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  The whitepaper is still rife with unreasonable comparisons.  The Mac spreadsheet is loaded with software burdens the PC should also have.  But the biggest &#8220;unreasonable&#8221; choice by author Roger Kay is the $2,500 Mac Pro for the occasional gamer and video editor. Instead, a $1,499 new 24&#8243; iMac will do the job nicely.  Add Parallels 4.0 for $80 and you can run all that Windows legacy software too so it won;t add to the Mac Tax.  A one-processor Mac Pro is half-baked (it is a dual-processor-capable workstation) and not needed here. Consumers would not look at the Mac Pro in this example as it is out of their budget range, plain and simple.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;ll give beta Windows 7 credit for being much better than Vista 1.0.  But comparing tomorrow&#8217;s Windows 7 to today&#8217;s OS X is unfair too; Apple&#8217;s Snow Leopard 10.6 is expected around mid-year, and is the logical OS to compare with Windows 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, I found out what a &quot;fanboy&quot; was about 10 months ago, when I purchased my first Mac (an iMac).  As a Windows user for the previous 22 years, I was growing increasingly frustrated with the baffling (i.e., &quot;friendly&quot; and &quot;easy&quot;) interface of Mac software, the inability to resize a window by anything but its lower-right corner, the lack of support for Windows-style tables in Mail, and the lack of a more full-featured Outlook counterpart.  In other words, I missed some of the &quot;business-class&quot; features available in the Windows environment.  And, frankly, I found found some of the ways of doing things in Mac software to be less keystroke and mouse-click efficient than they were in the Windows environment.  

I learned what a &quot;fanboy&quot; was when I aired some of my frustrations on MacWorld.com.  A &quot;fanboy&quot; is cultlike person who is devoted to defending and protecting the Mac platform from its detractors.  A fanboy behaves as if he is a member of an zombilelike army whose sole mission is vigorously defending the honor of his chosen computing environment.  As if an OS has honor that needs defending.  With all the fervor and purpose of a fundamentalist religious zealot, the fanboy sets out to attack others who find fault with the Mac OS in any of its iterations and/or the programs that run on it. And like a religious zealot, he can tolerate no challenges to his beliefs.  For the most part, I think he tends to be a child either chronologically or emotionally. 

As one who now has experience with both OS&#039;s, I have come to prefer the Mac environment for its stability and because it leaves behind all the crap and problems associated with programs that automatically load things into startup without your express permission and with the resource-consuming antivirus programs you can never finish paying for or &quot;subscribing&quot; to.  My 10-month-old iMac runs as fast today as it did they day I bought it.  I wouldn&#039;t be able to say that about a Windows machine.  

I&#039;m still learning my way around the OS and its programs, but the things I most love about it are the  consumer-level programs.  Windows still has an edge in the performance of its word processors, e-mail program, and spreadsheets.  

I&#039;m getting ready to buy a new laptop.  What will it be?  I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s going to be a Mac, either the 15&quot; or the 17&quot; version.  I mean, I can still run Windows on it when absolutely have to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I found out what a &#8220;fanboy&#8221; was about 10 months ago, when I purchased my first Mac (an iMac).  As a Windows user for the previous 22 years, I was growing increasingly frustrated with the baffling (i.e., &#8220;friendly&#8221; and &#8220;easy&#8221;) interface of Mac software, the inability to resize a window by anything but its lower-right corner, the lack of support for Windows-style tables in Mail, and the lack of a more full-featured Outlook counterpart.  In other words, I missed some of the &#8220;business-class&#8221; features available in the Windows environment.  And, frankly, I found found some of the ways of doing things in Mac software to be less keystroke and mouse-click efficient than they were in the Windows environment.  </p>
<p>I learned what a &#8220;fanboy&#8221; was when I aired some of my frustrations on MacWorld.com.  A &#8220;fanboy&#8221; is cultlike person who is devoted to defending and protecting the Mac platform from its detractors.  A fanboy behaves as if he is a member of an zombilelike army whose sole mission is vigorously defending the honor of his chosen computing environment.  As if an OS has honor that needs defending.  With all the fervor and purpose of a fundamentalist religious zealot, the fanboy sets out to attack others who find fault with the Mac OS in any of its iterations and/or the programs that run on it. And like a religious zealot, he can tolerate no challenges to his beliefs.  For the most part, I think he tends to be a child either chronologically or emotionally. </p>
<p>As one who now has experience with both OS&#8217;s, I have come to prefer the Mac environment for its stability and because it leaves behind all the crap and problems associated with programs that automatically load things into startup without your express permission and with the resource-consuming antivirus programs you can never finish paying for or &#8220;subscribing&#8221; to.  My 10-month-old iMac runs as fast today as it did they day I bought it.  I wouldn&#8217;t be able to say that about a Windows machine.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still learning my way around the OS and its programs, but the things I most love about it are the  consumer-level programs.  Windows still has an edge in the performance of its word processors, e-mail program, and spreadsheets.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting ready to buy a new laptop.  What will it be?  I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s going to be a Mac, either the 15&#8243; or the 17&#8243; version.  I mean, I can still run Windows on it when absolutely have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom b</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a new motto for MSFT: &quot;Everyday low prices&quot;. Oops-- I guess Walmart already has that one, and Walmart actually sells some decent products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new motto for MSFT: &#8220;Everyday low prices&#8221;. Oops&#8211; I guess Walmart already has that one, and Walmart actually sells some decent products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the word &quot;fanboy&quot; mean? Are there BMW &quot;fanboys&quot;, Sony &quot;fanboys&quot;, Starbucks &quot;fanboys&quot;, etc? Or does it only refer to people who prefer Macs to Windows? Fanboy sounds derogatory. Is it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the word &#8220;fanboy&#8221; mean? Are there BMW &#8220;fanboys&#8221;, Sony &#8220;fanboys&#8221;, Starbucks &#8220;fanboys&#8221;, etc? Or does it only refer to people who prefer Macs to Windows? Fanboy sounds derogatory. Is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Microsoft is pouring so much money and resources into arguing that you can buy Windows PCs for a lot less than Mac&quot; -- um, that&#039;s what advertising is for.  More importantly, the ads point out that you can often get a lot more computer (specs-wise) for a lot less money.

It&#039;s very savvy of MS to finally respond to Apple&#039;s ads in a sophisticated and effective way.  Why do so many tech bloggers and tech writers - few of them lovers of Microsoft - feel these ads are so effective?  Because they are.  And why are certain bloggers and tech writers actually angry about these ads, and insist Microsoft has fallen into some kind of &#039;trap&#039; by reinforcing the simple truths that Macs are expensive and only target narrow market segments?  I don&#039;t know why for sure, but the word &#039;fanboy&#039; keeps popping into my head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft is pouring so much money and resources into arguing that you can buy Windows PCs for a lot less than Mac&#8221; &#8212; um, that&#8217;s what advertising is for.  More importantly, the ads point out that you can often get a lot more computer (specs-wise) for a lot less money.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very savvy of MS to finally respond to Apple&#8217;s ads in a sophisticated and effective way.  Why do so many tech bloggers and tech writers &#8211; few of them lovers of Microsoft &#8211; feel these ads are so effective?  Because they are.  And why are certain bloggers and tech writers actually angry about these ads, and insist Microsoft has fallen into some kind of &#8216;trap&#8217; by reinforcing the simple truths that Macs are expensive and only target narrow market segments?  I don&#8217;t know why for sure, but the word &#8216;fanboy&#8217; keeps popping into my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/13/microsofts-apple-tax-white-paper-lets-try-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10768#comment-13822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like in politics, perception is reality. Microsoft knows that its ads are an exaggeration, but they put the already-defensive Mac crowd into frothing-at-the-mouth mode. Thus, Microsoft wins. I highly doubt these ads will do anything to hurt the Mac&#039;s market share, but they do soften the brand by making fun of it and its devotees. Also as in politics, going on the defensive is an admission of guilt. As a relatively unbiased observer (and a Mac user), I have to admit that these ads are brilliant... probably the first &quot;brilliant&quot; thing I&#039;ve seen Microsoft produce in years. I get a daily laugh reading all the nonsensical rants in defense of the Mac that clutter my feed-reader. The best defense is to simply continue using and buying Macs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like in politics, perception is reality. Microsoft knows that its ads are an exaggeration, but they put the already-defensive Mac crowd into frothing-at-the-mouth mode. Thus, Microsoft wins. I highly doubt these ads will do anything to hurt the Mac&#8217;s market share, but they do soften the brand by making fun of it and its devotees. Also as in politics, going on the defensive is an admission of guilt. As a relatively unbiased observer (and a Mac user), I have to admit that these ads are brilliant&#8230; probably the first &#8220;brilliant&#8221; thing I&#8217;ve seen Microsoft produce in years. I get a daily laugh reading all the nonsensical rants in defense of the Mac that clutter my feed-reader. The best defense is to simply continue using and buying Macs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

