<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitterers are Heathens!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/04/14/twitterers-are-heathens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/14/twitterers-are-heathens/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Controversial &#8220;Twitter Immorality&#8221; Study Even Mention Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/14/twitterers-are-heathens/comment-page-1/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Does Controversial &#8220;Twitter Immorality&#8221; Study Even Mention Twitter?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10890#comment-13986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to drum up some controversy, fling fighting words Twitter’s way. It worked, and several writers took the bait, their article titles making it look like Nietzsche had birthed Twitter from his [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to drum up some controversy, fling fighting words Twitter’s way. It worked, and several writers took the bait, their article titles making it look like Nietzsche had birthed Twitter from his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/14/twitterers-are-heathens/comment-page-1/#comment-13959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pseudonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10890#comment-13959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never mind whether you&#039;ve taken on neuroscientists or not. Your mere appearance of bravery has no bearing on the truth. While your skepticism is appreciated, your journalism appears quite shoddy: PhysOrg is not where the study originally &quot;appeared&quot;; it is slated to do so in the PNAS next week. Get your facts straight before you shoot from your hip: maybe that is part of the message of the study.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind whether you&#8217;ve taken on neuroscientists or not. Your mere appearance of bravery has no bearing on the truth. While your skepticism is appreciated, your journalism appears quite shoddy: PhysOrg is not where the study originally &#8220;appeared&#8221;; it is slated to do so in the PNAS next week. Get your facts straight before you shoot from your hip: maybe that is part of the message of the study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DTNick</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/14/twitterers-are-heathens/comment-page-1/#comment-13943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DTNick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=10890#comment-13943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this would be a problem if all communication took the form of 140-character text blurbs, but in the real world, not so much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this would be a problem if all communication took the form of 140-character text blurbs, but in the real world, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

