<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ Says Microsoft is, Indeed, Working on a Phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Phones: Verizon in April?</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-2/#comment-36315</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Phones: Verizon in April?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-36315</guid>
		<description>[...] to introduce Microsoft-branded phones? Project &#8220;Pink&#8221; is a rumor that&#8217;s been floating around for months, and at this point it&#8217;s not that interesting a question. But here&#8217;s the latest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to introduce Microsoft-branded phones? Project &#8220;Pink&#8221; is a rumor that&#8217;s been floating around for months, and at this point it&#8217;s not that interesting a question. But here&#8217;s the latest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive: TheStreet.com’s Tech Exclusives Are A Crapshoot &#124; Gizmodo Australia</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-2/#comment-35725</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclusive: TheStreet.com’s Tech Exclusives Are A Crapshoot &#124; Gizmodo Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-35725</guid>
		<description>[...] story would seem to give new life to old rumours about a Microsoft phone, code-named project &#8220;Pink&#8221;. Except…Scott Moritz stories headlined as &#8220;exclusives&#8221; &#8211; usually crediting Kumar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story would seem to give new life to old rumours about a Microsoft phone, code-named project &#8220;Pink&#8221;. Except…Scott Moritz stories headlined as &#8220;exclusives&#8221; &#8211; usually crediting Kumar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive: TheStreet.com&#8217;s Tech Exclusives Are a Crapshoot</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-35702</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclusive: TheStreet.com&#8217;s Tech Exclusives Are a Crapshoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-35702</guid>
		<description>[...] story would seem to give new life to old rumors about a Microsoft phone, code-named project &#8220;Pink.&#8221; Except&#8230;Scott Moritz stories headlined as&#8221;exclusives&#8221;&#8211;usually crediting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story would seem to give new life to old rumors about a Microsoft phone, code-named project &#8220;Pink.&#8221; Except&#8230;Scott Moritz stories headlined as&#8221;exclusives&#8221;&#8211;usually crediting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft&#8217;s Handheld Gaming Intentions, xYzposed!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-15976</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft&#8217;s Handheld Gaming Intentions, xYzposed!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-15976</guid>
		<description>[...] HD, complete with a touch screen and due in the fall. There&#8217;s also talk of an iPhone rival, codenamed &#8220;Pink,&#8221; that involves collaboration with Verizon. This third device seems to fit in the former category [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HD, complete with a touch screen and due in the fall. There&#8217;s also talk of an iPhone rival, codenamed &#8220;Pink,&#8221; that involves collaboration with Verizon. This third device seems to fit in the former category [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDoors</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-14904</link>
		<dc:creator>JDoors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-14904</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but my FIRST thought was of a bunch of overheating, &quot;red-ring-of-death&quot; phones resulting in recalls, warranty woes, and lawsuits. Good luck with that MS.

On the other hand, if Windows 7 is any indication, MS has improved on many levels since Vista &amp; the 360 were introduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but my FIRST thought was of a bunch of overheating, &#8220;red-ring-of-death&#8221; phones resulting in recalls, warranty woes, and lawsuits. Good luck with that MS.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if Windows 7 is any indication, MS has improved on many levels since Vista &amp; the 360 were introduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft und Verizon arbeiten an Apple iPhone-Rivalen &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-14881</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft und Verizon arbeiten an Apple iPhone-Rivalen &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-14881</guid>
		<description>[...] WSJ Says Microsoft is, Indeed, Working on a Phone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WSJ Says Microsoft is, Indeed, Working on a Phone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Romano</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-14867</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-14867</guid>
		<description>Fantastic, 
I wish I didn&#039;t have to wait until 2010 to see the result.
I&#039;ll just stick with my HTC Touch Pro till then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic,<br />
I wish I didn&#8217;t have to wait until 2010 to see the result.<br />
I&#8217;ll just stick with my HTC Touch Pro till then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom B</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-14861</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-14861</guid>
		<description>1) Has MSFT ever competently delivered a solid development environment? Nope.
2) Have they ever delivered a truly modern OS? Remember, Windows never made it to UNIX, and Win Mobile isn&#039;t even a close subset of Windows. So, fail on this point,too.
3) Can MSFT deliver any kind of online service, like an &quot;app store&quot;. No way.
4) Was commodity hardware a good idea-- you get a bunch of dopes like Michael Dell making cr*ppy junk you have to support with your OS. Fail again.

No worries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Has MSFT ever competently delivered a solid development environment? Nope.<br />
2) Have they ever delivered a truly modern OS? Remember, Windows never made it to UNIX, and Win Mobile isn&#8217;t even a close subset of Windows. So, fail on this point,too.<br />
3) Can MSFT deliver any kind of online service, like an &#8220;app store&#8221;. No way.<br />
4) Was commodity hardware a good idea&#8211; you get a bunch of dopes like Michael Dell making cr*ppy junk you have to support with your OS. Fail again.</p>
<p>No worries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-14857</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-14857</guid>
		<description>I think the iPhone was introduced in 2007... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the iPhone was introduced in 2007&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/04/28/wsj-says-microsoft-is-indeed-working-on-a-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-14848</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11280#comment-14848</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft and Verizon make a deal before Apple and Verizon make a deal, I will leave Verizon for AT&amp;T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft and Verizon make a deal before Apple and Verizon make a deal, I will leave Verizon for AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
