Comments on: Chrome for the Mac: Still Waiting! http://technologizer.com/2009/05/04/chrome-for-the-mac-still-waiting/ Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken & Friends Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:21:44 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: tom b http://technologizer.com/2009/05/04/chrome-for-the-mac-still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-15210 tom b Tue, 05 May 2009 14:04:53 +0000 http://technologizer.com/?p=11456#comment-15210 I'm enjoying Firefox 3.0.7. No worries; Chrome will come when it comes, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Mac version is better than the Windows version, just like you see with Firefox; they have a way better foundation to work with. I’m enjoying Firefox 3.0.7. No worries; Chrome will come when it comes, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the Mac version is better than the Windows version, just like you see with Firefox; they have a way better foundation to work with.

]]> By: Edmund http://technologizer.com/2009/05/04/chrome-for-the-mac-still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-15170 Edmund Tue, 05 May 2009 10:29:07 +0000 http://technologizer.com/?p=11456#comment-15170 If you had read Ars Technica's article 'Chrome for OS X: State of the Browser' (http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/03/chromium-for-os-x-state-of-the-browser.ars) then you would already have known this. In the article, Google hinted at a public beta of Chrome for the Mac this fall. If you had read Ars Technica’s article ‘Chrome for OS X: State of the Browser’ (http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/03/chromium-for-os-x-state-of-the-browser.ars) then you would already have known this. In the article, Google hinted at a public beta of Chrome for the Mac this fall.

]]> By: Aktariel http://technologizer.com/2009/05/04/chrome-for-the-mac-still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-15152 Aktariel Tue, 05 May 2009 06:27:03 +0000 http://technologizer.com/?p=11456#comment-15152 The hardest part of implementation if I understand correctly is sandboxing the render process, and making each tab an individual process. Check out Stainless (www.stainlessapp.com) in the meantime for a nice beta browser with one-process-per-tab-goodness and things like multiple sessions in the same browser. (I don't work for them, I just think the browser is a nice tech demo.) The hardest part of implementation if I understand correctly is sandboxing the render process, and making each tab an individual process.

Check out Stainless (www.stainlessapp.com) in the meantime for a nice beta browser with one-process-per-tab-goodness and things like multiple sessions in the same browser.

(I don’t work for them, I just think the browser is a nice tech demo.)

]]> By: Camster http://technologizer.com/2009/05/04/chrome-for-the-mac-still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-15138 Camster Tue, 05 May 2009 04:15:45 +0000 http://technologizer.com/?p=11456#comment-15138 At least you've got the Safari 4 beta for that tasty Webkit speed.... At least you’ve got the Safari 4 beta for that tasty Webkit speed….

]]> By: gianpo http://technologizer.com/2009/05/04/chrome-for-the-mac-still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-15128 gianpo Tue, 05 May 2009 01:46:59 +0000 http://technologizer.com/?p=11456#comment-15128 Its BS that a version for mac hasn't come out yet considering webkit is an apple technology. Its BS that a version for mac hasn’t come out yet considering webkit is an apple technology.

]]>