<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assuming There&#8217;s a New York Times in 2040, I Hope It&#8217;s Not This One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Redesign New York</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-20196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Website Redesign New York]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-20196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing this post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future Has a Loading Screen &#124; technology software gadget mobile blackberry</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-20194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Future Has a Loading Screen &#124; technology software gadget mobile blackberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-20194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is similarl&amp;#121 out of character (more a&amp;#98o&amp;#117t the campai&amp;#103n).&amp;#84e&amp;#99hnolog&amp;#105zer n&amp;#111tices a similar &amp;#112r&amp;#111blem where the &amp;#99am&amp;#112ai&amp;#103n &amp;#112aints the f&amp;#117t&amp;#117re &amp;#111f the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is similarl&amp;#121 out of character (more a&amp;#98o&amp;#117t the campai&amp;#103n).&amp;#84e&amp;#99hnolog&amp;#105zer n&amp;#111tices a similar &amp;#112r&amp;#111blem where the &amp;#99am&amp;#112ai&amp;#103n &amp;#112aints the f&amp;#117t&amp;#117re &amp;#111f the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Assuming There&#8217;s a New York Times in 2040, I Hope It&#8217;s Not This One I just went to NYTimes.com, as I do multiple times a day. A split-second after I arrived at the homepage, it was [...] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Assuming There&#8217;s a New York Times in 2040, I Hope It&#8217;s Not This One I just went to NYTimes.com, as I do multiple times a day. A split-second after I arrived at the homepage, it was [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advertising - ANIMAL</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Advertising - ANIMAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recognizable in the year 2040, but there will be a woman president who gets advice from dolphins. &#124;Technologizer via AAA&#124;   by Bucky Turco on May 12, 2009 at 3:43 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recognizable in the year 2040, but there will be a woman president who gets advice from dolphins. |Technologizer via AAA|   by Bucky Turco on May 12, 2009 at 3:43 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, have a sense of humor why don&#039;t you.  You seem like you&#039;re really missing the bigger message of the Sponsors of Tomorrow campaign and the underlying tone-in-cheek nature of the advertising.  I think this campaign does a fantastic job of changing the conversation with Intel. For years, Intel was seen as a sleepy giant that rested on its successful, commodity products. Now, it provides an emotional connection to consumers, showing them the quirky, human, and ultra-intelligent side of Intel. If you know anything about the company, you know that this &quot;Sponsors of Tomorrow&quot; tagline is really something they live and breathe. It&#039;s time that the geniuses under the surface got some credit. I also like the fact that during this tough economic climate, Intel is providing an optimistic voice the looks towards a brighter future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, have a sense of humor why don&#8217;t you.  You seem like you&#8217;re really missing the bigger message of the Sponsors of Tomorrow campaign and the underlying tone-in-cheek nature of the advertising.  I think this campaign does a fantastic job of changing the conversation with Intel. For years, Intel was seen as a sleepy giant that rested on its successful, commodity products. Now, it provides an emotional connection to consumers, showing them the quirky, human, and ultra-intelligent side of Intel. If you know anything about the company, you know that this &#8220;Sponsors of Tomorrow&#8221; tagline is really something they live and breathe. It&#8217;s time that the geniuses under the surface got some credit. I also like the fact that during this tough economic climate, Intel is providing an optimistic voice the looks towards a brighter future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry McCracken</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry McCracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@rizzn,

Hey, I know that the Times is far from perfect, and I don&#039;t mean to make the Intel ad sound scandalous (I was more embarrassed than offended). And I know that a media company that can&#039;t provide a worthwhile value proposition to advertisers doesn&#039;t have a business. (It&#039;s not just ones that give away content for free, either--few magazines could survive on reader revenue alone.)

But I believe with all my heart that media companies must satisfy marketers by finding a group of like-minded community members, and gaining their trust. That&#039;s how you make them receptive to advertising messages. There isn&#039;t a single great media brand that succeeded by doing an end run and thinking of advertisers before readers. 

Or to put it another way: No trust, no readers, no advertisers.

--Harry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rizzn,</p>
<p>Hey, I know that the Times is far from perfect, and I don&#8217;t mean to make the Intel ad sound scandalous (I was more embarrassed than offended). And I know that a media company that can&#8217;t provide a worthwhile value proposition to advertisers doesn&#8217;t have a business. (It&#8217;s not just ones that give away content for free, either&#8211;few magazines could survive on reader revenue alone.)</p>
<p>But I believe with all my heart that media companies must satisfy marketers by finding a group of like-minded community members, and gaining their trust. That&#8217;s how you make them receptive to advertising messages. There isn&#8217;t a single great media brand that succeeded by doing an end run and thinking of advertisers before readers. </p>
<p>Or to put it another way: No trust, no readers, no advertisers.</p>
<p>&#8211;Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Times Reader 2.0. Beautiful, and Beautifully Done. But is It a Dead End?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Times Reader 2.0. Beautiful, and Beautifully Done. But is It a Dead End?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all:&amp;nbspReviews   Having begun my day by sniping at the New York Times, I wanted to end it by complimenting it: The company released version 2.0 of its Times Reader [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all:&amp;nbspReviews   Having begun my day by sniping at the New York Times, I wanted to end it by complimenting it: The company released version 2.0 of its Times Reader [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-05-11 &#171; Mandarine</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2009-05-11 &#171; Mandarine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Assuming There’s a New York Times in 2040, I Hope It’s Not This One &#124; Technologizer (tags: future newspapers) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Assuming There’s a New York Times in 2040, I Hope It’s Not This One | Technologizer (tags: future newspapers) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Krepcio</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-3/#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Krepcio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I consider this to be much, MUCH worse than the ad which write about, and on the same night you call out that &#039;other&#039; Intel ad. 

Actual PRODUCT PLACEMENT in a piece of journalism in the New York Times. 

Unbelievable.

http://bit.ly/NYT_INTELpp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider this to be much, MUCH worse than the ad which write about, and on the same night you call out that &#8216;other&#8217; Intel ad. </p>
<p>Actual PRODUCT PLACEMENT in a piece of journalism in the New York Times. </p>
<p>Unbelievable.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/NYT_INTELpp" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/NYT_INTELpp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publicidad: New York Times en el 2040 &#124; Sicrono</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/11/assuming-theres-a-new-york-times-in-2040-i-hope-its-not-this-one/comment-page-2/#comment-15661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publicidad: New York Times en el 2040 &#124; Sicrono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=11703#comment-15661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] de ese mismo medio dentro de 31 años. ¿Habrá NYT en el 2040? ¿Usaremos navegador? &#124; Vía: un periodista disconforme.    Esta entrada fue publicada el 11 de Mayo de 2009, fue archivada en Publicidad y ha recibido 0 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de ese mismo medio dentro de 31 años. ¿Habrá NYT en el 2040? ¿Usaremos navegador? | Vía: un periodista disconforme.    Esta entrada fue publicada el 11 de Mayo de 2009, fue archivada en Publicidad y ha recibido 0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

