<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Windows 7 and Netbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resolved: There Are No Such Things as Netbooks&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-19289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Resolved: There Are No Such Things as Netbooks&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12147#comment-19289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have basic CPUs and graphics that aren&#8217;t well-suited to high-end tasks; thanks in part to Microsoft licensing rules, they have skimpy amounts of RAM. But that doesn&#8217;t make them something other than notebooks. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have basic CPUs and graphics that aren&#8217;t well-suited to high-end tasks; thanks in part to Microsoft licensing rules, they have skimpy amounts of RAM. But that doesn&#8217;t make them something other than notebooks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toshiba (Finally) Does Netbooks&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-17134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toshiba (Finally) Does Netbooks&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12147#comment-17134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] gives me pause with all netbooks: The NB205 comes with 1GB of RAM. I persist in being frustrated by Microsoft licensing terms that make it impossible to sell a low-cost netbook with 2GB of RAM and a .... It seems especially silly to hobble machines as appealing and attractive as these Toshibas with an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gives me pause with all netbooks: The NB205 comes with 1GB of RAM. I persist in being frustrated by Microsoft licensing terms that make it impossible to sell a low-cost netbook with 2GB of RAM and a &#8230;. It seems especially silly to hobble machines as appealing and attractive as these Toshibas with an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe They Should Call It &#8220;Windows 7 Grudging Acknowledgement of Reality Edition&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-16995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maybe They Should Call It &#8220;Windows 7 Grudging Acknowledgement of Reality Edition&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12147#comment-16995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all:&amp;nbspNews   Paul Thurrott had it right: Microsoft has decided to lift the three-apps-at-a-time limitation from Windows 7 Starter Edition, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all:&amp;nbspNews   Paul Thurrott had it right: Microsoft has decided to lift the three-apps-at-a-time limitation from Windows 7 Starter Edition, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDoors</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-16579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JDoors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12147#comment-16579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Harry: &quot;... the one (restriction) that sticks in my craw is the continuing requirement that netbooks ship with a maximum of 1GB of RAM. RAM’s cheap enough these days that there would surely be 2GB netbooks if Microsoft didn’t try to prevent them from shipping.&quot;

Microsoft&#039;s doing no such thing. They are simply saying if it&#039;s not an el-cheapo netbook it would be better off with a more comprehensive edition of Windows on it. Will MS make more money on the &quot;Home&quot; rather than &quot;Starter&quot; edition? Yup. And the netbook manufacturers and retailers will make more money on what is, technically, no longer a netbook (unless they&#039;re all willing to give away the better hardware for free).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Harry: &#8220;&#8230; the one (restriction) that sticks in my craw is the continuing requirement that netbooks ship with a maximum of 1GB of RAM. RAM’s cheap enough these days that there would surely be 2GB netbooks if Microsoft didn’t try to prevent them from shipping.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s doing no such thing. They are simply saying if it&#8217;s not an el-cheapo netbook it would be better off with a more comprehensive edition of Windows on it. Will MS make more money on the &#8220;Home&#8221; rather than &#8220;Starter&#8221; edition? Yup. And the netbook manufacturers and retailers will make more money on what is, technically, no longer a netbook (unless they&#8217;re all willing to give away the better hardware for free).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-16558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12147#comment-16558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foo: Yeah that&#039;s fine until you want to compress that 40mb video you took on your phone so it fits on Facebook. 

No one should be fooled that a Netbook of that spec will not let you down at some point. They&#039;re fine as an extra machine for taking out and about, or sitting on the sofa - but not as a main PC. Pay a bit more, and you could get one that could be used for both (asides from the small screen)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foo: Yeah that&#8217;s fine until you want to compress that 40mb video you took on your phone so it fits on Facebook. </p>
<p>No one should be fooled that a Netbook of that spec will not let you down at some point. They&#8217;re fine as an extra machine for taking out and about, or sitting on the sofa &#8211; but not as a main PC. Pay a bit more, and you could get one that could be used for both (asides from the small screen)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/05/22/more-on-windows-7-and-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-16529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12147#comment-16529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since computers reached a certain speed, I stopped worrying about processor and memory.

Here&#039;s a perfectly fine $250 netbook specification:

- Display: 10 inches
- Battery: 8 hours
- Storage: 8 GB SSD
- Weight: 1 kg
- Processor: 800MHz
- Memory: 512MB

As you can see, comfort and portability are the most important factors.

I&#039;d be more than happy with a 800MHz/512MB netbook as long as it had decent display and keyboard sizes. All I need is a browser, really.

Thus, a Linux/ARM netbook would fit the bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since computers reached a certain speed, I stopped worrying about processor and memory.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a perfectly fine $250 netbook specification:</p>
<p>- Display: 10 inches<br />
- Battery: 8 hours<br />
- Storage: 8 GB SSD<br />
- Weight: 1 kg<br />
- Processor: 800MHz<br />
- Memory: 512MB</p>
<p>As you can see, comfort and portability are the most important factors.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be more than happy with a 800MHz/512MB netbook as long as it had decent display and keyboard sizes. All I need is a browser, really.</p>
<p>Thus, a Linux/ARM netbook would fit the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

