<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWDC&#8217;s Big Loser: AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIM and AT&#38;T: The Love Affair Blossoms</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-2/#comment-55279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RIM and AT&#38;T: The Love Affair Blossoms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-55279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] any recent Apple event&#8211;at those, AT&amp;T gets a respectful nod if it&#8217;s lucky, and is left vulnerable to snickers of derision if it isn&#8217;t. At this one, it was presented as the Torch&#8217;s coauthor. The Torch [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any recent Apple event&#8211;at those, AT&amp;T gets a respectful nod if it&#8217;s lucky, and is left vulnerable to snickers of derision if it isn&#8217;t. At this one, it was presented as the Torch&#8217;s coauthor. The Torch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there a Restraining Order for That? &#124; North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-2/#comment-30346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is there a Restraining Order for That? &#124; North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-30346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Wireless to do when a single device is getting so much press? Attack the iPhone’s achilles heel: The AT&amp;T Network. In a series of ads, using the slogan “There’s a Map for That”, Verizon compared its superior [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wireless to do when a single device is getting so much press? Attack the iPhone’s achilles heel: The AT&amp;T Network. In a series of ads, using the slogan “There’s a Map for That”, Verizon compared its superior [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Tethering on AT&#38;T: One Year and Counting&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-2/#comment-29441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone Tethering on AT&#38;T: One Year and Counting&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-29441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] tethering seven months later and named 22 carriers who would be ready on day of launch&#8211;and AT&amp;T was not among them. The carrier merely said that it would support tethering at some unspecified date&#8211;which [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tethering seven months later and named 22 carriers who would be ready on day of launch&#8211;and AT&amp;T was not among them. The carrier merely said that it would support tethering at some unspecified date&#8211;which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tethering Dependent on Widespread 4G Adoption &#124; Digital Media Buzz</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-2/#comment-25794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tethering Dependent on Widespread 4G Adoption &#124; Digital Media Buzz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-25794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Developers Conference in June 2009, Apple announced the release of iPhone 3.0 and, with it, the ability to tether your iPhone. Although many tech-savvy people were already familiar with the technology, it was a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Developers Conference in June 2009, Apple announced the release of iPhone 3.0 and, with it, the ability to tether your iPhone. Although many tech-savvy people were already familiar with the technology, it was a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Owners Would Like to Replace Battery, AT&#38;T [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-2/#comment-24056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone Owners Would Like to Replace Battery, AT&#38;T [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-24056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that occurred when AT&amp;T admitted at Macworld 2009 that unlike dozens of other carriers that it wasn&#8217;t ready to support iPhone tethering or MMS support. But it’s interesting that AT&amp;T (T) is responsible for two of the top three complaints about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that occurred when AT&amp;T admitted at Macworld 2009 that unlike dozens of other carriers that it wasn&#8217;t ready to support iPhone tethering or MMS support. But it’s interesting that AT&amp;T (T) is responsible for two of the top three complaints about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Owners Would Like to Replace Battery, AT&#38;T &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-1/#comment-24051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone Owners Would Like to Replace Battery, AT&#38;T &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-24051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that isn’t all that surprising given the swell of bad press that occured when AT&amp;T admitted at Macworld 2009 that unlike dozens of other carriers it wasn&#8217;t yet ready t.... But it’s interesting that AT&amp;T is responsible for the 2 of the top 3 complaints about an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that isn’t all that surprising given the swell of bad press that occured when AT&amp;T admitted at Macworld 2009 that unlike dozens of other carriers it wasn&#8217;t yet ready t&#8230;. But it’s interesting that AT&amp;T is responsible for the 2 of the top 3 complaints about an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apple Core mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-1/#comment-21807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Apple Core mobile edition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-21807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and over-sold. Complaints about widespread AT&amp;T outages at large events like Macworld Expo, WWDC, SXSW and concerts seem to have fallen on deaf ears. ComicCon is the latest example of how AT&amp;T [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and over-sold. Complaints about widespread AT&amp;T outages at large events like Macworld Expo, WWDC, SXSW and concerts seem to have fallen on deaf ears. ComicCon is the latest example of how AT&amp;T [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Gives Some iPhone 3G Owners a Break&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-1/#comment-18773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T Gives Some iPhone 3G Owners a Break&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-18773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a classy move on its part to do so&#8211;and a smart one. After a week and a half of some of the most intense negative coverage I can remember for a tech company, it just did something that will tickle some of its most loyal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a classy move on its part to do so&#8211;and a smart one. After a week and a half of some of the most intense negative coverage I can remember for a tech company, it just did something that will tickle some of its most loyal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahrdad</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-1/#comment-18763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahrdad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-18763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had Verizon for 12 or 13 years, and even though the call quality was excellent, I was really infuriated with how they locked all the features of their phones.  I have not had a &quot;Smartphone&quot; with Verizon, but that policy was really a pain.  I get more dropped or unsuccessful calls with my 3G every week than I had with Verizon in 12 years, but the tight control Verizon wanted to keep on the phones and the fact that it was unusable overseas will prevent me from going back to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had Verizon for 12 or 13 years, and even though the call quality was excellent, I was really infuriated with how they locked all the features of their phones.  I have not had a &#8220;Smartphone&#8221; with Verizon, but that policy was really a pain.  I get more dropped or unsuccessful calls with my 3G every week than I had with Verizon in 12 years, but the tight control Verizon wanted to keep on the phones and the fact that it was unusable overseas will prevent me from going back to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Exclusivity Could Help Apple, Hurt Competitors &#124; The Mac Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/08/wwdcs-big-loser-att/comment-page-1/#comment-18582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anti-Exclusivity Could Help Apple, Hurt Competitors &#124; The Mac Sucks!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=12947#comment-18582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] if Apple itself isn&#8217;t behind this. At the recent Apple Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC), Apple indicated that it was AT&amp;T&#8217;s fault that they wouldn&#8217;t have MMS support in the iPhone until late in the summer, and that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if Apple itself isn&#8217;t behind this. At the recent Apple Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC), Apple indicated that it was AT&amp;T&#8217;s fault that they wouldn&#8217;t have MMS support in the iPhone until late in the summer, and that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

