<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another DTV Transition Cost: Tech Trash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/11/another-dtv-transition-cost-tech-trash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/11/another-dtv-transition-cost-tech-trash/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condensed Knowledge &#8211; June 14, 2009 &#8211; Lists - Raoul Pop</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/11/another-dtv-transition-cost-tech-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-18367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Condensed Knowledge &#8211; June 14, 2009 &#8211; Lists - Raoul Pop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13144#comment-18367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Another DTV Transition Cost: Tech Trash [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another DTV Transition Cost: Tech Trash [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecco6t9</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/11/another-dtv-transition-cost-tech-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-18264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ecco6t9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13144#comment-18264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I take cans in I get paid.

When I take and old broken monitor in I have to pay them, when I can just dump it at the lot 2 blocks over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I take cans in I get paid.</p>
<p>When I take and old broken monitor in I have to pay them, when I can just dump it at the lot 2 blocks over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDoors</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/11/another-dtv-transition-cost-tech-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-18261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JDoors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13144#comment-18261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I buy a new car battery or tires, there&#039;s a &#039;recovery&#039; charge listed separately on the bill, allegedly to pay for proper recycling. However, I suspect most of that gets frittered away, with very little actually going to solve the problems of toxic waste. Tires and batteries are still being shipped overseas to minimally or un-regulated recyclers.

Apparently, there just aren&#039;t enough concerned (or economically self-destructive) citizens to force the TRUE costs of recycling onto ourselves. I know I&#039;m perfectly happy to have my glass, metal, paper and plastic hauled away each week for &quot;free&quot; (even though I know it&#039;s not really free) and much of it cannot and never will be economically recycled and winds up in a landfill anyway. But hey, &quot;I recycle!&quot;

The true costs of recycling electronics? Whoa. I don&#039;t even want to think about that. (Guess I&#039;m not concerned enough ...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I buy a new car battery or tires, there&#8217;s a &#8216;recovery&#8217; charge listed separately on the bill, allegedly to pay for proper recycling. However, I suspect most of that gets frittered away, with very little actually going to solve the problems of toxic waste. Tires and batteries are still being shipped overseas to minimally or un-regulated recyclers.</p>
<p>Apparently, there just aren&#8217;t enough concerned (or economically self-destructive) citizens to force the TRUE costs of recycling onto ourselves. I know I&#8217;m perfectly happy to have my glass, metal, paper and plastic hauled away each week for &#8220;free&#8221; (even though I know it&#8217;s not really free) and much of it cannot and never will be economically recycled and winds up in a landfill anyway. But hey, &#8220;I recycle!&#8221;</p>
<p>The true costs of recycling electronics? Whoa. I don&#8217;t even want to think about that. (Guess I&#8217;m not concerned enough &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/11/another-dtv-transition-cost-tech-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-18239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Barnes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13144#comment-18239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t recycle.
Just toss into the local dump.
That way those valuable materials will be close at hand when we run out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t recycle.<br />
Just toss into the local dump.<br />
That way those valuable materials will be close at hand when we run out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

