<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodachrome No More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris Jada</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-111170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paris Jada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-111170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope that they will replace something for this. I am a big fan of Kodak and my first camera is even Kodak. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that they will replace something for this. I am a big fan of Kodak and my first camera is even Kodak. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy Clarkin</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-110086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darcy Clarkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-110086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really a sad news for me. I have been using this for years and I just can&#039;t move on when this was announced. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a sad news for me. I have been using this for years and I just can&#039;t move on when this was announced. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tabatha Seidl</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-109674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabatha Seidl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-109674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why? This is the first word that I have uttered after reading this post. I think this was not a good move for Kodak. There are still photographers who use films. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? This is the first word that I have uttered after reading this post. I think this was not a good move for Kodak. There are still photographers who use films. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mama Took My Kodachrome Away&#8230; &#171; Photo Gear Info</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mama Took My Kodachrome Away&#8230; &#171; Photo Gear Info]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/" rel="nofollow">http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus T.  Firefly</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus T.  Firefly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kodachrome and I are much of an age, both having been born in 1935.  It&#039;s unnerving to see one&#039;s contemporaries dying off, even when they are not as nice as Kodachrome.

In 1950, I shot my first 35mm pictures on this film--mostly from the top of the Washington Monument. The last time I looked at them, several years ago, they looked new.   I doubt there is a new archival technology that would beat just leaving them in a cool dry dark place.

I suspect Kodak&#039;s message is that no film is safe.

RTF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kodachrome and I are much of an age, both having been born in 1935.  It&#8217;s unnerving to see one&#8217;s contemporaries dying off, even when they are not as nice as Kodachrome.</p>
<p>In 1950, I shot my first 35mm pictures on this film&#8211;mostly from the top of the Washington Monument. The last time I looked at them, several years ago, they looked new.   I doubt there is a new archival technology that would beat just leaving them in a cool dry dark place.</p>
<p>I suspect Kodak&#8217;s message is that no film is safe.</p>
<p>RTF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mama Took My Kodachrome Away &#171; Photo Gear Info</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mama Took My Kodachrome Away &#171; Photo Gear Info]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/" rel="nofollow">http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m totally in mourning for Kodachrome, even though I haven&#039;t actually shot it for years- have many slides from many years filed away. Kodachrome was, for lack of any better words, beautiful, and a major technical advance when it was first released. One of the problems with much digital photography is that many images are never printed. If the hard drive crashes, are they gone forever? If they are on CD&#039;s, will there be CD readers? Is the lack of a physical object, produced with some degree of care, a loss? I have digital cameras, and massively backed up digital archives, and have been totally seduced by the ease of the process, but I haven&#039;t completely come to terms with all of the issues.

As far as obsolescence, film, at least for black and white, might be a bit more persistent than 8 tracks in that it is essentially capable of being used in a large variety of low-tech equipment. We&#039;ve done projects in which we built little cardboard boxes with pinholes, that we have used with 120 and 35 mm film and cute little film advance contrivances. The chemicals for processing black and white film are easily mixed (I have not tried the coffee and orange juice variations yet, but the developing agents are still available) and I know a number of artists who are still using conventional black and white materials. There&#039;s also a renewed interest in low-tech film cameras like the Lomo and Holga. 

Sorry, a longish comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally in mourning for Kodachrome, even though I haven&#8217;t actually shot it for years- have many slides from many years filed away. Kodachrome was, for lack of any better words, beautiful, and a major technical advance when it was first released. One of the problems with much digital photography is that many images are never printed. If the hard drive crashes, are they gone forever? If they are on CD&#8217;s, will there be CD readers? Is the lack of a physical object, produced with some degree of care, a loss? I have digital cameras, and massively backed up digital archives, and have been totally seduced by the ease of the process, but I haven&#8217;t completely come to terms with all of the issues.</p>
<p>As far as obsolescence, film, at least for black and white, might be a bit more persistent than 8 tracks in that it is essentially capable of being used in a large variety of low-tech equipment. We&#8217;ve done projects in which we built little cardboard boxes with pinholes, that we have used with 120 and 35 mm film and cute little film advance contrivances. The chemicals for processing black and white film are easily mixed (I have not tried the coffee and orange juice variations yet, but the developing agents are still available) and I know a number of artists who are still using conventional black and white materials. There&#8217;s also a renewed interest in low-tech film cameras like the Lomo and Holga. </p>
<p>Sorry, a longish comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No big loss. I&#039;m 32 years old and I&#039;ve never used a camera that wasn&#039;t digital in my entire life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big loss. I&#8217;m 32 years old and I&#8217;ve never used a camera that wasn&#8217;t digital in my entire life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Barnes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Wonder how long it’ll be until film is as utterly dead as, say, 8-track is today?&quot;

3.2 years]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wonder how long it’ll be until film is as utterly dead as, say, 8-track is today?&#8221;</p>
<p>3.2 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [TechBlogWatch] Best of Blogs für den 22.6.: Facebook Klick-Betrug, Schwerelose Hochzeit,Werbe-SMS, GTA Chinatown, Superphones &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/06/22/kodchrome-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[TechBlogWatch] Best of Blogs für den 22.6.: Facebook Klick-Betrug, Schwerelose Hochzeit,Werbe-SMS, GTA Chinatown, Superphones &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=13570#comment-19175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Legende am Ende: Tschüss, KodakChrome!  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legende am Ende: Tschüss, KodakChrome!  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

