<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Modern Warfare Without Call of Duty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Sign of Decline for Call of Duty</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-62851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Sign of Decline for Call of Duty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14236#comment-62851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] wisely changed direction with an emphasis on secret agents instead of foot soldiers. It even considered dropping the Call of Duty name from Modern Warfare 2. Criticize Activision, if you will, for spitting out the same fundamentals [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisely changed direction with an emphasis on secret agents instead of foot soldiers. It even considered dropping the Call of Duty name from Modern Warfare 2. Criticize Activision, if you will, for spitting out the same fundamentals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Warfare to Become a Litigious Mess</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-36276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Modern Warfare to Become a Litigious Mess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14236#comment-36276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] funny thing is, last year I wildly predicted that a full Modern Warfare spinoff was conceivable. Of course I had no idea it might happen through [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] funny thing is, last year I wildly predicted that a full Modern Warfare spinoff was conceivable. Of course I had no idea it might happen through [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-21277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14236#comment-21277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also do u think there will be a cod vietnam?
Just askin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also do u think there will be a cod vietnam?<br />
Just askin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-21276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14236#comment-21276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i agree i am new 2 the series but personally i could care less about the name as long as its a good game and an even better multiplayer. Maybe even a taliban zombies game! that would be sick but i guess we will see]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree i am new 2 the series but personally i could care less about the name as long as its a good game and an even better multiplayer. Maybe even a taliban zombies game! that would be sick but i guess we will see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/10/whats-modern-warfare-without-call-of-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-20725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14236#comment-20725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally, as a long time Call Of Duty series fan am glad that they are sticking with the &quot;Call Of Duty&quot; Franchise name. This will mean that they will still be more closely associated with treyarch and will be able to legally take ideas from the others previous game and keep adding new ones to make every game in the series even better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally, as a long time Call Of Duty series fan am glad that they are sticking with the &#8220;Call Of Duty&#8221; Franchise name. This will mean that they will still be more closely associated with treyarch and will be able to legally take ideas from the others previous game and keep adding new ones to make every game in the series even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

