<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2010: The Technologizer First Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Britt</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-4/#comment-93986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Britt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-93986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ribbons STINK!  They are clunky and primative compared to the menu bar! 
 
Access 2010 is HORRIBLE; they took a good product and made it 100 times more complicated. 
 
IF IT AIN&#039;T BROKE DON&#039;T FIX IT! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ribbons STINK!  They are clunky and primative compared to the menu bar! </p>
<p>Access 2010 is HORRIBLE; they took a good product and made it 100 times more complicated. </p>
<p>IF IT AIN&#039;T BROKE DON&#039;T FIX IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office 2010: Desktop Heavyweight, Online Weakling</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-4/#comment-44348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Office 2010: Desktop Heavyweight, Online Weakling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-44348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] new Ribbon interface. And I mostly like Office 2010, which hasn&#8217;t changed radically since I first tried last July in preview form. Compared to Office 2007, it&#8217;s got a cleaned-up, more customizable version of the Ribbon. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new Ribbon interface. And I mostly like Office 2010, which hasn&#8217;t changed radically since I first tried last July in preview form. Compared to Office 2007, it&#8217;s got a cleaned-up, more customizable version of the Ribbon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Docs Gets Ready to Face Office 2010</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-39843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Docs Gets Ready to Face Office 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-39843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all: Reviews   Microsoft plans to ship Office 2010&#8211;and the suite&#8217;s complementary Office Web Apps&#8211;in June. Among the many companies [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all: Reviews   Microsoft plans to ship Office 2010&#8211;and the suite&#8217;s complementary Office Web Apps&#8211;in June. Among the many companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-37277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-37277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excuse me? Quick Step is only available for Outlook Exchange? This is one of the best maybe the best new feature in Outlook 2010, the search is well you know (but I haven&#039;t expected something different) and something you can cope with as long as you have been smart enough to get yourself a third-party search tool like lookeen, but hey Microsoft what is going on, do you want to scare the rest of the Outlook users away to other e-mail-programs like Thunderbird?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me? Quick Step is only available for Outlook Exchange? This is one of the best maybe the best new feature in Outlook 2010, the search is well you know (but I haven&#8217;t expected something different) and something you can cope with as long as you have been smart enough to get yourself a third-party search tool like lookeen, but hey Microsoft what is going on, do you want to scare the rest of the Outlook users away to other e-mail-programs like Thunderbird?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Opens Up the Office 2010 Beta&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-30050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft Opens Up the Office 2010 Beta&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-30050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of what I said in my earlier looks at the Office  2010 apps and their Web Apps counterparts remains true. There&#8217;s lots of worthwhile new stuff throughout [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of what I said in my earlier looks at the Office  2010 apps and their Web Apps counterparts remains true. There&#8217;s lots of worthwhile new stuff throughout [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-29527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-29527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing beneficial for most businesses – no reason to upgrade/purchase – 

Like Vista – all bling – no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access – umm wasn’t that functional with Office XP – why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don’t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I’m one person and most of my clients don’t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing beneficial for most businesses – no reason to upgrade/purchase – </p>
<p>Like Vista – all bling – no function.</p>
<p>If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -<br />
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.</p>
<p>2. Full OLE support for pictures in access – umm wasn’t that functional with Office XP – why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?</p>
<p>3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don’t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I’m one person and most of my clients don’t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-29504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-29504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing beneficial for most businesses - no reason to upgrade/purchase - 

Like Vista  - all bling - no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access - umm wasn&#039;t that functional with Office XP - why take that out?   Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database?  Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code.   Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don&#039;t want to learn the new menu bar.   You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar.  Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I&#039;m one person and most of my clients don&#039;t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003.  MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing beneficial for most businesses &#8211; no reason to upgrade/purchase &#8211; </p>
<p>Like Vista  &#8211; all bling &#8211; no function.</p>
<p>If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -<br />
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.</p>
<p>2. Full OLE support for pictures in access &#8211; umm wasn&#8217;t that functional with Office XP &#8211; why take that out?   Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database?  Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code.   Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?</p>
<p>3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don&#8217;t want to learn the new menu bar.   You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar.  Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I&#8217;m one person and most of my clients don&#8217;t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003.  MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office 2010 Goes Free, Gets Ads&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-27699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Office 2010 Goes Free, Gets Ads&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-27699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all:&amp;nbspNews   When Microsoft Office 2010 shows up sometime next year, the most basic version will have an appealing price: $0. Microsoft has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all:&amp;nbspNews   When Microsoft Office 2010 shows up sometime next year, the most basic version will have an appealing price: $0. Microsoft has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office&#8217;s Slow Road to the Web: First Hands-On Look&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-25912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft Office&#8217;s Slow Road to the Web: First Hands-On Look&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-25912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PowerPoint, and OneNote. The Web version of Office is part of the suite later officially dubbed Office 2010, which won&#8217;t arrive until next year.  But it tiptoed a little closer to reality today: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PowerPoint, and OneNote. The Web version of Office is part of the suite later officially dubbed Office 2010, which won&#8217;t arrive until next year.  But it tiptoed a little closer to reality today: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office&#8217;s Slow Road to the Web: First Hands-On Look&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-2010-review/comment-page-3/#comment-25895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft Office&#8217;s Slow Road to the Web: First Hands-On Look&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=14244#comment-25895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PowerPoint, and OneNote. The Web version of Office was part of the suite later officially dubbed Office 2010, which won&#8217;t arrive until next year.  But they tiptoed a little closer to reality today: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PowerPoint, and OneNote. The Web version of Office was part of the suite later officially dubbed Office 2010, which won&#8217;t arrive until next year.  But they tiptoed a little closer to reality today: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

