<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Tries To Hush Owners of Exploding iPod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: make ipod safe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-23642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[make ipod safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-23642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to stop the rumors and tell the world: ipod are safe top use or not, while talking in the iphone you can lose your head or not]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to stop the rumors and tell the world: ipod are safe top use or not, while talking in the iphone you can lose your head or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condensed Knowledge &#8211; August 9, 2009 &#8211; Lists - Raoul Pop</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-22832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Condensed Knowledge &#8211; August 9, 2009 &#8211; Lists - Raoul Pop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 09:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-22832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Apple Tries To Hush Owners of Exploding iPod [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Tries To Hush Owners of Exploding iPod [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-22532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-22532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven&#039;s points largely cover it, but I&#039;d add that, in the UK, legal rights to a refund on the sale of goods (as opposed to damages/ex-gratia payments etc) are with the retailer, which was a third party retailer in this case, and the rights wouldn&#039;t cover this sort of situation.  These people are most likely complaining to/about Apple because the retailer refused a refund as they had damaged the iPod before the battery blew. 

It&#039;s fairly normal to require an agreement when paying out on a no-liability basis and not just to sweep problems under the rug - it means that it&#039;s harder to find out what a manufacturer might pay you to go away if you complain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven&#8217;s points largely cover it, but I&#8217;d add that, in the UK, legal rights to a refund on the sale of goods (as opposed to damages/ex-gratia payments etc) are with the retailer, which was a third party retailer in this case, and the rights wouldn&#8217;t cover this sort of situation.  These people are most likely complaining to/about Apple because the retailer refused a refund as they had damaged the iPod before the battery blew. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s fairly normal to require an agreement when paying out on a no-liability basis and not just to sweep problems under the rug &#8211; it means that it&#8217;s harder to find out what a manufacturer might pay you to go away if you complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Fisher</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-22377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Fisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-22377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know about the spin that&#039;s been put on this. Let&#039;s say you drop an Acer laptop computer and it breaks. Is the manufacturer going to replace it under warranty? How about a Zune?

The difference here is that the battery was damaged in the fall. Apple offered a refund BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO INSPECT THE UNIT. And because they didn&#039;t want people thinking dropping an iPod might lead to a warranty, they ASKED that the owner not talk about the experience.

Frankly, it seems pretty @#$%ing reasonable to me. And, as noted, the family decided not to take Apple up on the offer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the spin that&#8217;s been put on this. Let&#8217;s say you drop an Acer laptop computer and it breaks. Is the manufacturer going to replace it under warranty? How about a Zune?</p>
<p>The difference here is that the battery was damaged in the fall. Apple offered a refund BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO INSPECT THE UNIT. And because they didn&#8217;t want people thinking dropping an iPod might lead to a warranty, they ASKED that the owner not talk about the experience.</p>
<p>Frankly, it seems pretty @#$%ing reasonable to me. And, as noted, the family decided not to take Apple up on the offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Oswald</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-22369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Oswald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-22369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh - actually these agreements appear to be pretty common from what my research is showing me - a lot of companies seem to want to sweep problems under the rug. AJ - from my understanding, no. they are sealed into the device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh &#8211; actually these agreements appear to be pretty common from what my research is showing me &#8211; a lot of companies seem to want to sweep problems under the rug. AJ &#8211; from my understanding, no. they are sealed into the device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-22347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-22347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Josh,

Can Apple store employees remove the &quot;non-removable&quot; batteries? I suppose Apple could have a program where customers take their iPod Touch to the Apple Store and get the battery swapped there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh,</p>
<p>Can Apple store employees remove the &#8220;non-removable&#8221; batteries? I suppose Apple could have a program where customers take their iPod Touch to the Apple Store and get the battery swapped there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/apple-tries-to-hush-owners-of-exploding-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-22333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15158#comment-22333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...with 175 million iPods sold, how do you go about recalling the devices if it was necessary? That could be a daunting task.&quot;

You would recall them much in the same way that Dell and Apple have recalled devices with bad lithium-ion batteries in the past: announce the affected model numbers and create a recall program. Exploding batteries in electronic devices is really nothing new, and any device with a lithium ion battery could potentially explode if damaged. I think the real WTF here is that Apple requested a confidentiality agreement in order to provide the customer with a refund.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;with 175 million iPods sold, how do you go about recalling the devices if it was necessary? That could be a daunting task.&#8221;</p>
<p>You would recall them much in the same way that Dell and Apple have recalled devices with bad lithium-ion batteries in the past: announce the affected model numbers and create a recall program. Exploding batteries in electronic devices is really nothing new, and any device with a lithium ion battery could potentially explode if damaged. I think the real WTF here is that Apple requested a confidentiality agreement in order to provide the customer with a refund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

