<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine Reasons RadioShack Shouldn&#8217;t Change Its Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-93532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-93532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how about ElectroShack? 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about ElectroShack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getting rich</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-84626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[getting rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-84626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your comments and sites. Great info and best wishes to all of you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your comments and sites. Great info and best wishes to all of you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-35822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-35822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you go to Boston University?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you go to Boston University?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-35821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-35821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey, I went to Boston University from 1965-1971.  So, I knew where that store was!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, I went to Boston University from 1965-1971.  So, I knew where that store was!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Working For The Man SUCKS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When Brand Evangelists Attack</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-29493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Working For The Man SUCKS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When Brand Evangelists Attack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-29493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hence, my trotting out this stale bit from August, that still seems relevant today, as I see the huge spend in media buy kick in for RadioShack (hey! Holidaze Season is upon us). Read it- seriously. Nine Reasons RadioShack Shouldn&#8217;t Change its Name [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hence, my trotting out this stale bit from August, that still seems relevant today, as I see the huge spend in media buy kick in for RadioShack (hey! Holidaze Season is upon us). Read it- seriously. Nine Reasons RadioShack Shouldn&#8217;t Change its Name [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-28832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-28832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[reason # 10

&quot;the shack&quot; is already the name of a store in Lompoc, CA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reason # 10</p>
<p>&#8220;the shack&#8221; is already the name of a store in Lompoc, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-25156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-25156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[glad someone else agrees. i kinda think the shack is a desperate attempt to reach out to (the super lame) hipster scene kind of people and draw in a new generation of customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glad someone else agrees. i kinda think the shack is a desperate attempt to reach out to (the super lame) hipster scene kind of people and draw in a new generation of customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Looking Glass Laboratory - Curing the symptom, not the disease &#8211; a look at &#8220;The Shack&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-24413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Looking Glass Laboratory - Curing the symptom, not the disease &#8211; a look at &#8220;The Shack&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-24413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more by changing their name? That doesn&#039;t say &quot;new and cool&quot;, it says &quot;wishy-washy&quot;. (There are  other reasons  , too)   Remember Circuit City? While their  website  says &quot;We&#039;re open&quot; the 155 stores that they [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more by changing their name? That doesn&#39;t say &quot;new and cool&quot;, it says &quot;wishy-washy&quot;. (There are  other reasons  , too)   Remember Circuit City? While their  website  says &quot;We&#39;re open&quot; the 155 stores that they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrilander</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-9/#comment-24229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xrilander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-24229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BK, FEDEX, you get the picture. Everything has to be shortened. Seems people today are to dumb or lazy to spell out anything in it`s entirety. As for Radio Shack, I used to frequently shop there back in the 70`s and 80`s. Former member of the battery of the month club!
I also purchased a few Realistic combo amplifier/equilizers for my cars. Remember the fm converter you hooked up to your cars am radio? Had one of those too. Little diodes and LED`s, electronic kits, CB radios, and my last purchase from them, an indiglo caller id box a few years ago. Ah, but their time has passed. They have been dying a slow and painful death for years, and calling themselves &quot;the shack&quot; will only accelerate the process. R.I.P. Radio Shack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BK, FEDEX, you get the picture. Everything has to be shortened. Seems people today are to dumb or lazy to spell out anything in it`s entirety. As for Radio Shack, I used to frequently shop there back in the 70`s and 80`s. Former member of the battery of the month club!<br />
I also purchased a few Realistic combo amplifier/equilizers for my cars. Remember the fm converter you hooked up to your cars am radio? Had one of those too. Little diodes and LED`s, electronic kits, CB radios, and my last purchase from them, an indiglo caller id box a few years ago. Ah, but their time has passed. They have been dying a slow and painful death for years, and calling themselves &#8220;the shack&#8221; will only accelerate the process. R.I.P. Radio Shack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRWeek: Brand nicknames require careful planning (August 13, 2009)</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/08/03/nin-reasons-radioshack-shouldnt-change-its-name/comment-page-8/#comment-23375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRWeek: Brand nicknames require careful planning (August 13, 2009)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=15131#comment-23375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and rebranding campaign, the response from the industry and the public was mixed. Some in the blogosphere went so far as to say a name change will never work, while others suggest there are clear steps [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and rebranding campaign, the response from the industry and the public was mixed. Some in the blogosphere went so far as to say a name change will never work, while others suggest there are clear steps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

