<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPods DO Get a Refresh, But Only the Nano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/09/09/ipods-do-get-a-refresh-but-only-the-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/09/ipods-do-get-a-refresh-but-only-the-nano/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extensor</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/09/ipods-do-get-a-refresh-but-only-the-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-25447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Extensor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=16744#comment-25447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your headline is incorrect. The iPod Touch was upgraded, the 32 and 64 GB models have faster hardware.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline is incorrect. The iPod Touch was upgraded, the 32 and 64 GB models have faster hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouke Timbermont</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/09/ipods-do-get-a-refresh-but-only-the-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-25302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouke Timbermont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=16744#comment-25302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m seriously bummed about the touch not getting a camera... especially because the Nano DOES get one!!!

And iTunes 9 is fugly: it looks like it overexposed all the time...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seriously bummed about the touch not getting a camera&#8230; especially because the Nano DOES get one!!!</p>
<p>And iTunes 9 is fugly: it looks like it overexposed all the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NanoGeek</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/09/ipods-do-get-a-refresh-but-only-the-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-25299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NanoGeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=16744#comment-25299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to buy a new Touch when the updates came out, but I&#039;m not so sure now. I hope the rumors are true that Apple will be releasing a camera equipped Touch sometime later. I&#039;m holding off until then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to buy a new Touch when the updates came out, but I&#8217;m not so sure now. I hope the rumors are true that Apple will be releasing a camera equipped Touch sometime later. I&#8217;m holding off until then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

