Comments on: More Apple TV for Your Money

By: Fanfoot

Fanfoot — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:25:21 +0000

I like my Apple TV. I think the update is nice enough, if rather tepid.

I don’t use it much though. Most of the time when I look to see if a movie is available on it, it isn’t.

And when I’m looking for a TV show, its more likely to be available on Hulu when I want to watch it (usually I just missed it) than on the Apple TV.

I think Apple could make a bigger splash if they fixed either of these things–movies closer to DVD release, and some kind of support for flash video streaming sites.

In the absence of some kind of update to add either one of these, I’ll probably move onto something else eventually. No idea what though. A STB offering Comcast’s TV Anywhere service?

By: Apple TV, iTunes Updated; World Remains Unchanged | Technologizer

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:56:58 +0000

[...] when Apple will start a subscription service. For the moment, my colleague Harry McCracken has largely forsaken his Apple TV for a Roku, because his Roku gives him unlimited content through [...]

By: Mike Hill

Mike Hill — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:26:03 +0000

I’ve added ATV Flash, which enables the USB port for hubs, external drives or keyboards, as well as adding other features such as a browser, ssh and ftp access, etc. on mine.

I had hoped to be able to stream from Apple TV to other computers in my home, so far this isn’t an option. Remote management from iTunes is kinda clunky.

Since this connected to the home stereo, my music collection is sync’d as well, using the Apple remote application on the iPhone is awesome.

The content from the iTunes store is very good, I have purchased a couple of TV show subscriptions, I wish they would had more of .99 rentals.

By: Dale Larson

Dale Larson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:02:01 +0000

I’d love an AppleTV with more storage and that served iTunes files to other computers on the network (since our Mac Book Airs do everything we need except have space for all our music)!

I’m surprised you think 40gb is adequate. We rented an HD movie from iTunes over the weekend: 4gb. Our music collection is over 100gb. Even 160gb simply isn’t enough storage at our house.

But $229 sure is sweet. Would much rather have gotten closer to that price point than to the $800 we had to spring on a Mac Mini.

Do game consoles come close to being able to serve the same functions, but to also play games, for a similar price?

By: Finn Jack

Finn Jack — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:56:56 +0000

Apple has not yet announced any information regarding Apple TV. So it is better to avoid expectations about this Apple product, as it may too disappoint like the recent Apple event’s products. But sure it would provide a good entertainment.

By: bacon salt

bacon salt — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:47:58 +0000

What are you smoking? How is 40 GiB enough for a typical music collection? How many people do you know who only own a hundred or so CDs/records? I have my music in shitting mp3 v0 and it still takes up over 300 GiB. Don’t get me started on movies. At about a gig a film, how is 40 GiB going to be enough for anyone?

By: Relyt

Relyt — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:17:39 +0000

Not enough storage – The most basic Apple Laptops ship with a hard drive that same size.

By: tom b

tom b — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:58:35 +0000

“Apple TV is a fun and well-designed product, but it hasn’t turned out to be an iPod-like transcendent hit. Then again, neither has anything else involving bringing the Internet into the living room”

You nail it. When the iPod launched, lots of MP3 players were already being sold, and the shortcomings of these players were obvious to Apple. TV viewing habits and modalities are FAR more complex; I see NO companies “winning” this battle–yet.