<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where No Mac Had Gone Before</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bims</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-86712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bims]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-86712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.) You made some decent points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most individuals will go along with with your website.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.) You made some decent points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most individuals will go along with with your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-26277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget the Mac. I want that formula for that transparent aluminum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the Mac. I want that formula for that transparent aluminum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkpost &#124; 9.18.2009 &#124; L&#38;C Tech Talk</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-26142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linkpost &#124; 9.18.2009 &#124; L&#38;C Tech Talk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Where No Mac Had Gone Before &#8211; Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Mac Plus, circa 1986, is going up for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where No Mac Had Gone Before &#8211; Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Mac Plus, circa 1986, is going up for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where No Mac Had Gone Before &#124; Technologizer &#124; Geeks In Training</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-26085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where No Mac Had Gone Before &#124; Technologizer &#124; Geeks In Training]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Where No Mac Had Gone Before &#124; Technologizer. Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Mac 128 (later upgraded to a Mac Plus) is going up for auction. On one hand, it&#8217;s just an old computer, but on the other, think of the cross-inspiration between the two franchises — would we have the iPod if it weren&#8217;t for the Tricorder? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where No Mac Had Gone Before | Technologizer. Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Mac 128 (later upgraded to a Mac Plus) is going up for auction. On one hand, it&#8217;s just an old computer, but on the other, think of the cross-inspiration between the two franchises — would we have the iPod if it weren&#8217;t for the Tricorder? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cd</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-26081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be more cool if Gene Roddenberry signed the Mac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be more cool if Gene Roddenberry signed the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moe88</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-26070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moe88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DaveZatz
You &#039;re a morron
!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveZatz<br />
You &#8216;re a morron<br />
!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: druzilla</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-2/#comment-26049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[druzilla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using macfaq.org&#039;s early Mac serial # decoder:

&quot;Your Macintosh 128 (M0001), with serial number F4200NUM0001, was the 776th manufactured during the 20th week of 1984 in Fremont, CA.&quot; 

From that it was &quot;born&quot; sometime during the week of Monday, May 14th, 1984.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using macfaq.org&#8217;s early Mac serial # decoder:</p>
<p>&#8220;Your Macintosh 128 (M0001), with serial number F4200NUM0001, was the 776th manufactured during the 20th week of 1984 in Fremont, CA.&#8221; </p>
<p>From that it was &#8220;born&#8221; sometime during the week of Monday, May 14th, 1984.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoR</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-1/#comment-26048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trek influence is visible all throughout Apple&#039;s product lines.  You can&#039;t tell me the iPhone/iPod Touch interface wasn&#039;t inspired by the control surfaces in ST:TNG.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trek influence is visible all throughout Apple&#8217;s product lines.  You can&#8217;t tell me the iPhone/iPod Touch interface wasn&#8217;t inspired by the control surfaces in ST:TNG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.B.</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-1/#comment-26040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R.B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Treat it with Retr0bright, quick!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treat it with Retr0bright, quick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now we know why the original Star Trek had a Mac &#171; Sharing the truth one thread at a time</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/17/where-no-mac-had-gone-before/comment-page-1/#comment-26039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Now we know why the original Star Trek had a Mac &#171; Sharing the truth one thread at a time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17200#comment-26039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Went&#160;Wrong?    Now we know why the original Star Trek had a&#160;Mac September 18, 2009   Hello computer:  Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Mac Plus Is Coming Up For [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Went&nbsp;Wrong?    Now we know why the original Star Trek had a&nbsp;Mac September 18, 2009   Hello computer:  Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Mac Plus Is Coming Up For [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

