<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Worth a Billion Dollars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HowtoMakeaBillionDollars</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-27822</link>
		<dc:creator>HowtoMakeaBillionDollars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17613#comment-27822</guid>
		<description>Is Twitter worth $1 billion?

Only if they can find a way to make $40 out of every one of their 25 milion-or-so users. So I&#039;d go with &#039;no&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Twitter worth $1 billion?</p>
<p>Only if they can find a way to make $40 out of every one of their 25 milion-or-so users. So I&#8217;d go with &#8216;no&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-26808</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17613#comment-26808</guid>
		<description>Eswarm is twitter with a purpose. Yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eswarm is twitter with a purpose. Yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-26671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17613#comment-26671</guid>
		<description>Twitter is not even worth one cent! its point less it should just die like frendster did, who uses frendster any ways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is not even worth one cent! its point less it should just die like frendster did, who uses frendster any ways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter, It&#8217;s Time to Fix Short URLs&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-26662</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter, It&#8217;s Time to Fix Short URLs&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17613#comment-26662</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Twitter Worth a Billion&#160;Dollars?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Twitter Worth a Billion&nbsp;Dollars?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugfaceuk</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-26646</link>
		<dc:creator>bugfaceuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17613#comment-26646</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never felt it was distinctive, but I&#039;m not sure it is over-hyped at all. If the commenter means that it gets far more attention than the technology alone deserves... I can see the point. However, the level of attention is enormous and as such I don&#039;t think Twitter is hyped at all. It simply is. 

Personally, I don&#039;t get it but there&#039;s no doubt it had a significant audience and if a buyer were (allowed?) to strike now they would be buying a real, and growing audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never felt it was distinctive, but I&#8217;m not sure it is over-hyped at all. If the commenter means that it gets far more attention than the technology alone deserves&#8230; I can see the point. However, the level of attention is enormous and as such I don&#8217;t think Twitter is hyped at all. It simply is. </p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t get it but there&#8217;s no doubt it had a significant audience and if a buyer were (allowed?) to strike now they would be buying a real, and growing audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Sharpe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/09/24/is-twitter-worth-a-billion-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-26644</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Sharpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=17613#comment-26644</guid>
		<description>Twitter is massively, massively overhyped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is massively, massively overhyped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
