<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome for Mac: Not Here Yet, But Use It Anyway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/10/22/chrome-for-mac-not-here-yet-but-use-it-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/22/chrome-for-mac-not-here-yet-but-use-it-anyway/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome for Mac, Finally Within Sight?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/22/chrome-for-mac-not-here-yet-but-use-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-29669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrome for Mac, Finally Within Sight?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=18845#comment-29669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chrome and its open-source doppelganger Chromium for Mac have been around for quite awhile, but the most recent ones I&#8217;ve tried have been almost ready for prime time&#8211;but not [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome and its open-source doppelganger Chromium for Mac have been around for quite awhile, but the most recent ones I&#8217;ve tried have been almost ready for prime time&#8211;but not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guitar God</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/22/chrome-for-mac-not-here-yet-but-use-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-28531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Guitar God]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=18845#comment-28531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point in this article:
The mac version of Chrome has like 9 menu-items. Why?
I&#039;m guessing in OSX the menubar is there anyway, so why not use it..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point in this article:<br />
The mac version of Chrome has like 9 menu-items. Why?<br />
I&#8217;m guessing in OSX the menubar is there anyway, so why not use it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/22/chrome-for-mac-not-here-yet-but-use-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-28510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=18845#comment-28510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am using GC version.. 4.0.223.8 right now on my MBP. I see some changes from the last version I was using...although at times it does silly things... it seems to be fairly stable. But I do agree with the previous comment.. I don&#039;t think there is the effort to get GC for the MAc like there was for Windoze...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using GC version.. 4.0.223.8 right now on my MBP. I see some changes from the last version I was using&#8230;although at times it does silly things&#8230; it seems to be fairly stable. But I do agree with the previous comment.. I don&#8217;t think there is the effort to get GC for the MAc like there was for Windoze&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom b</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/22/chrome-for-mac-not-here-yet-but-use-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-28500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=18845#comment-28500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are obviously not ready to compete with Firefox; they aren&#039;t putting serious effort into this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are obviously not ready to compete with Firefox; they aren&#8217;t putting serious effort into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

