<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T: Our Network is Fine, Thank You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brough Turner</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28963</link>
		<dc:creator>Brough Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28963</guid>
		<description>Denial by a &quot;spokesperson&quot; doesn&#039;t answer the specific technical issues I raised.  It&#039;s unfortunate there doesn&#039;t appear to be a way to reach someone within AT&amp;T who actually understands routing and TCP congestion control.

Since writing my article, I have received additional measurement data from individuals that confirms AT&amp;T Wireless has this specific buffer problem elsewhere in their network, but I have received no contact from AT&amp;T technical people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denial by a &#8220;spokesperson&#8221; doesn&#8217;t answer the specific technical issues I raised.  It&#8217;s unfortunate there doesn&#8217;t appear to be a way to reach someone within AT&amp;T who actually understands routing and TCP congestion control.</p>
<p>Since writing my article, I have received additional measurement data from individuals that confirms AT&amp;T Wireless has this specific buffer problem elsewhere in their network, but I have received no contact from AT&amp;T technical people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28945</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28945</guid>
		<description>I have  blackjack from samsung for almost two years with ATT. and sometimes i do not get reception here in Tujunga or at work in L.A. I do not understand if ATT is the fastest 3G network why my family using Verizon get the signal on hte same spots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have  blackjack from samsung for almost two years with ATT. and sometimes i do not get reception here in Tujunga or at work in L.A. I do not understand if ATT is the fastest 3G network why my family using Verizon get the signal on hte same spots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The T-Grid: Verizon Droid vs. iPhone 3GS&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28937</link>
		<dc:creator>The T-Grid: Verizon Droid vs. iPhone 3GS&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28937</guid>
		<description>[...] promising Android 2.0 OS. And it&#8217;s on a network that doesn&#8217;t provoke much in the way of squawking from its customers. In short, it&#8217;s the most formidable Google rival since the Palm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] promising Android 2.0 OS. And it&#8217;s on a network that doesn&#8217;t provoke much in the way of squawking from its customers. In short, it&#8217;s the most formidable Google rival since the Palm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Pieniazek</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28931</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pieniazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28931</guid>
		<description>As I clicked the title of your article in Google Reader on my iPhone, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adampieniazek.com/apple/iphone-irony/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this happened&lt;/a&gt;.

The worst part is, I was not surprised in the least bit. AT&amp;T&#039;s network is the definition of FAIL.

P.S. On a monthly basis I call AT&amp;T and get a partial refund because their network sucks. Why are they giving me money back if their network is fine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I clicked the title of your article in Google Reader on my iPhone, <a href="http://www.adampieniazek.com/apple/iphone-irony/" rel="nofollow">this happened</a>.</p>
<p>The worst part is, I was not surprised in the least bit. AT&amp;T&#8217;s network is the definition of FAIL.</p>
<p>P.S. On a monthly basis I call AT&amp;T and get a partial refund because their network sucks. Why are they giving me money back if their network is fine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Irony</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28930</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Irony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28930</guid>
		<description>[...] you can&#039;t make this stuff up category, check out what happened right as I clicked to read about how AT&amp;T stated its network is fine in the mobile Google Reader site on my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you can&#39;t make this stuff up category, check out what happened right as I clicked to read about how AT&amp;T stated its network is fine in the mobile Google Reader site on my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28925</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28925</guid>
		<description>Would they admit it even if it were true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would they admit it even if it were true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/10/28/att-our-network-is-fine-thank-you/comment-page-1/#comment-28924</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19160#comment-28924</guid>
		<description>Well here&#039;s my experience so far...  For the past few weeks I&#039;m lucky if I can send email from my AT&amp;T Blackberry though I have 3-5 bars of EDGE signal showing.  This is in locations where I have never had trouble in the past and I&#039;ve had the phone for two years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here&#8217;s my experience so far&#8230;  For the past few weeks I&#8217;m lucky if I can send email from my AT&amp;T Blackberry though I have 3-5 bars of EDGE signal showing.  This is in locations where I have never had trouble in the past and I&#8217;ve had the phone for two years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
