<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Reasons to Celebrate Firefox&#8217;s Fifth Birthday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Zip</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-29544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Zip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19506#comment-29544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security:
When my boss was on (slow, rural) dial-up and thus unable to easily update his Win2K install, I was always pretty sanguine about his browsing security because FF was set up with AdBlock Plus, NoScript and FlashBlock. It is *really* difficult to get a nasty in this scenario.

Speed: Using only those add-ons (and with careful hosts file management) we were able to get browsing speeds up to manageable levels compared to IE 6. 
Yes, the memory usage issues of 18 months ago were a pain, but 3.6 beta is getting back to the right place.

Happy birthday FF! I still have that first NYTimes full-page ad somewhere, with my name proudly highlighted!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security:<br />
When my boss was on (slow, rural) dial-up and thus unable to easily update his Win2K install, I was always pretty sanguine about his browsing security because FF was set up with AdBlock Plus, NoScript and FlashBlock. It is *really* difficult to get a nasty in this scenario.</p>
<p>Speed: Using only those add-ons (and with careful hosts file management) we were able to get browsing speeds up to manageable levels compared to IE 6.<br />
Yes, the memory usage issues of 18 months ago were a pain, but 3.6 beta is getting back to the right place.</p>
<p>Happy birthday FF! I still have that first NYTimes full-page ad somewhere, with my name proudly highlighted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Personal Injury Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-29537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin Personal Injury Lawyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19506#comment-29537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love firefox. Ever since I first downloaded it, I haven&#039;t looked back. Every once in a while, I have to use a different browser and it always seems inferior. Happy 5th birthday!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love firefox. Ever since I first downloaded it, I haven&#8217;t looked back. Every once in a while, I have to use a different browser and it always seems inferior. Happy 5th birthday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry McCracken</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-29534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry McCracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19506#comment-29534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Steven: Good point--I was talking about feature creep, not memory and disk footprint, but Firefox could indeed be more lithe on those fronts. One of the reasons that I&#039;m looking forward to Chrome&#039;s formal arrival on the Mac is because it should be more of a featherweight than Firefox.

--Harry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steven: Good point&#8211;I was talking about feature creep, not memory and disk footprint, but Firefox could indeed be more lithe on those fronts. One of the reasons that I&#8217;m looking forward to Chrome&#8217;s formal arrival on the Mac is because it should be more of a featherweight than Firefox.</p>
<p>&#8211;Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouke Timbermont</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-29533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouke Timbermont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19506#comment-29533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Steven: check your mac. Here it takes about 7 seconds to start up after a fresh boot, 2 seconds for a restart after that and less than a blink to open up after closing the window... and that&#039;s on a 2007 basic MBP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steven: check your mac. Here it takes about 7 seconds to start up after a fresh boot, 2 seconds for a restart after that and less than a blink to open up after closing the window&#8230; and that&#8217;s on a 2007 basic MBP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Fisher</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/five-reasons-to-celebrate-firefoxs-fifth-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-29531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Fisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19506#comment-29531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take some issue with the idea that Firefox has spurned bloat. Firefox for Mac is a 17.6MB download that takes forever to start up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take some issue with the idea that Firefox has spurned bloat. Firefox for Mac is a 17.6MB download that takes forever to start up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

