<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. Murdoch, Build Up That Content Wall!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Microsoft Pay Murdoch to Opt Out of Google?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-30357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Microsoft Pay Murdoch to Opt Out of Google?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-30357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] so, I remain in the apparent small minority of pundits who would like to see Murdoch do something about the supposed relentless persecution of his poor, struggling b.... If that something involved an alliance with Microsoft, everybody involved would learn a lot, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so, I remain in the apparent small minority of pundits who would like to see Murdoch do something about the supposed relentless persecution of his poor, struggling b&#8230;. If that something involved an alliance with Microsoft, everybody involved would learn a lot, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasty Muncher</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pasty Muncher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you had a niche of seriously private content that you advertised heavily - perhaps then you would attract some visitors.  What is up Rupert&#039;s sleeve I wonder - streaming video of page 3 girls reading business articles from the Times?  How much would you pay?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you had a niche of seriously private content that you advertised heavily &#8211; perhaps then you would attract some visitors.  What is up Rupert&#8217;s sleeve I wonder &#8211; streaming video of page 3 girls reading business articles from the Times?  How much would you pay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Few Coherent Thoughts on Murdoch Blocking Google &#124; All Things Cahill</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Few Coherent Thoughts on Murdoch Blocking Google &#124; All Things Cahill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] retrospect, this may not be a bad thing.  Harry McCracken at Technologizer was one of the first to expound some of the reasons this might be just what media needs.  His [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retrospect, this may not be a bad thing.  Harry McCracken at Technologizer was one of the first to expound some of the reasons this might be just what media needs.  His [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All Mr Murdoch is going to do is lose readers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Mr Murdoch is going to do is lose readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll be interesting to see how this works out in the long run. Are we moving away from Chris Anderson&#039;s business model of &quot;FREE&quot; online? Are we ready for a world filled with fees for quality of content?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this works out in the long run. Are we moving away from Chris Anderson&#8217;s business model of &#8220;FREE&#8221; online? Are we ready for a world filled with fees for quality of content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raffers</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raffers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s going to fail horribly for one particular reason - the BBC. Due to the license fees, they wouldn&#039;t ever be able to implement a fee or they would have an entire nation rise up against them. Therefore, there will always be a source of free news from experienced journalists working for a major news organisation, and I doubt any of his current readers would willingly pay for news when they can easily access it from other sites (I&#039;m not saying that the BBC is the only free news site, but it is an example where free, professionally researched news will always be available no matter what), and if Murdoch is going to limit access to his own sites, it can only ever lead to failure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to fail horribly for one particular reason &#8211; the BBC. Due to the license fees, they wouldn&#8217;t ever be able to implement a fee or they would have an entire nation rise up against them. Therefore, there will always be a source of free news from experienced journalists working for a major news organisation, and I doubt any of his current readers would willingly pay for news when they can easily access it from other sites (I&#8217;m not saying that the BBC is the only free news site, but it is an example where free, professionally researched news will always be available no matter what), and if Murdoch is going to limit access to his own sites, it can only ever lead to failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Millard</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Millard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely would like to see him try it, largely for the reasons you point out.

However, if I were one of this writers, I&#039;d be trying to figure out how to keep my work available outside this wall.  Could really limit a writer&#039;s option for getting their work seen -- how depressing to go from a possible audience of million to thousands.

Do publishers bitch about The Week?  They largely &quot;free load&quot; in a similar way (though they may pay for the media, at least the magazines, they summarize from).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely would like to see him try it, largely for the reasons you point out.</p>
<p>However, if I were one of this writers, I&#8217;d be trying to figure out how to keep my work available outside this wall.  Could really limit a writer&#8217;s option for getting their work seen &#8212; how depressing to go from a possible audience of million to thousands.</p>
<p>Do publishers bitch about The Week?  They largely &#8220;free load&#8221; in a similar way (though they may pay for the media, at least the magazines, they summarize from).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksantani</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ksantani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for them... this will help them in dying sooner than later :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for them&#8230; this will help them in dying sooner than later :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/09/mr-murdoch-build-up-that-content-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-29538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19511#comment-29538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting viewpoint. Like you, I am willing to wait and watch. A single path to anything (a monopoly) is always bad for us end consumers. And if Google is the only way to find content, that is also not good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting viewpoint. Like you, I am willing to wait and watch. A single path to anything (a monopoly) is always bad for us end consumers. And if Google is the only way to find content, that is also not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

