<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Sezmi a Cable TV Killer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandie Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-3/#comment-83805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandie Kingsley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 15:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-83805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings from Los angeles! I&#039;m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the info you provide here and can&#039;t wait to take a look when I get home. I&#039;m amazed at how fast your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I&#039;m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, wonderful blog!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings from Los angeles! I&#8217;m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the info you provide here and can&#8217;t wait to take a look when I get home. I&#8217;m amazed at how fast your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I&#8217;m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, wonderful blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miss facebook</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-3/#comment-83739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miss facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 09:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-83739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website. It&#039;s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your theme? Excellent work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website. It&#8217;s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your theme? Excellent work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diek</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-3/#comment-76527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[diek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-76527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFL Jersey $21.88 
NBA Jersey $23 
NHL Jersey $33.8 
MBL Jersey $23 
FOOtball Jersey $23 
Sunglass $12 
Caps$hats $8.8 
Handbags $36 
web:tradetrusting 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NFL Jersey $21.88<br />
NBA Jersey $23<br />
NHL Jersey $33.8<br />
MBL Jersey $23<br />
FOOtball Jersey $23<br />
Sunglass $12<br />
Caps$hats $8.8<br />
Handbags $36<br />
web:tradetrusting </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floating Shelves&#160;</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-3/#comment-60794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Floating Shelves&#160;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-60794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[satellite TV is getting cheap nowadays, i would like to have my own satellite TV too,&quot;&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>satellite TV is getting cheap nowadays, i would like to have my own satellite TV too,&#8221;"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brianna Lee</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-3/#comment-48025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brianna Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-48025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Satellite TV users will definitely grow in the following years and also satellite internet users.`&quot;,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satellite TV users will definitely grow in the following years and also satellite internet users.`&#8221;,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikel</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-3/#comment-36257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-36257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got off the phone with someone at Sezmi...it really did not assist me, since the Detroit market, which I am adjacent to, but considered... does not have the &quot;plus&quot; (cable networks) version.

One thing that I was always a proponent of... DTV stations not coming in, mainly in apartments...so the public loses local info. Sezmi does not change this. If the locals are not from the net, you cannot guarantee reception of any locals. So why pay $300.00 to Best Buy to have an expensive tuner/DVR? I already have that, courtesy of Panasonic. Without a guarentee of locals or cable nets, I would waste $300.00 and pay $5.00 p/mo on what I get free. I will not be getting any new stations, so from that aspect, it won&#039;t be a cable killer.

I can get youtube already on my PC. I can get other videos as well. This will not change by paying that 300 dollars and then 5 dollars afterwards.

This reminds me of &quot;Wireless Cable&quot; from the late 80&#039;s and early 90&#039;s. You needed an antenna to get you locals. You also needed a separate antenna to get a few cable nets. Does anyone else remember this?

Another thing... the operator did not know for sure if the tuner inside the box was ATSC (DTV) and NTSC (old standard, snowy TV) or both. I get local Canadian stations on NTSC, along  with my low power locals.

According to the search that the guy did, I am not guaranteed to get the one station I always watch... ION Television (on WPXD-DT 33).

No, it&#039;s not a cable killer, at least of yet. If they add many more cable nets, keep costs to consumers low... it can compete. It won&#039;t kill cable though... and FIOS (Verizon) and Uverse (AT&amp;T) already have advantages in most markets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got off the phone with someone at Sezmi&#8230;it really did not assist me, since the Detroit market, which I am adjacent to, but considered&#8230; does not have the &#8220;plus&#8221; (cable networks) version.</p>
<p>One thing that I was always a proponent of&#8230; DTV stations not coming in, mainly in apartments&#8230;so the public loses local info. Sezmi does not change this. If the locals are not from the net, you cannot guarantee reception of any locals. So why pay $300.00 to Best Buy to have an expensive tuner/DVR? I already have that, courtesy of Panasonic. Without a guarentee of locals or cable nets, I would waste $300.00 and pay $5.00 p/mo on what I get free. I will not be getting any new stations, so from that aspect, it won&#8217;t be a cable killer.</p>
<p>I can get youtube already on my PC. I can get other videos as well. This will not change by paying that 300 dollars and then 5 dollars afterwards.</p>
<p>This reminds me of &#8220;Wireless Cable&#8221; from the late 80&#8242;s and early 90&#8242;s. You needed an antenna to get you locals. You also needed a separate antenna to get a few cable nets. Does anyone else remember this?</p>
<p>Another thing&#8230; the operator did not know for sure if the tuner inside the box was ATSC (DTV) and NTSC (old standard, snowy TV) or both. I get local Canadian stations on NTSC, along  with my low power locals.</p>
<p>According to the search that the guy did, I am not guaranteed to get the one station I always watch&#8230; ION Television (on WPXD-DT 33).</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not a cable killer, at least of yet. If they add many more cable nets, keep costs to consumers low&#8230; it can compete. It won&#8217;t kill cable though&#8230; and FIOS (Verizon) and Uverse (AT&amp;T) already have advantages in most markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stophe</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-2/#comment-36214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stophe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-36214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Horrible Product!! #FAIL

Here&#039;s my list of why this is a fail.

1- This product is pre-alpha. I&#039;m embarrassed that BestBuy is putting the product on their shelves. I encountered major bugs while performing simple tasks. Try downloading any content with it. You&#039;ll get white static for about 3 seconds.

2- The product is touting itself as bridging the gap between internet &amp; TV. But meanwhile, the only web content I can get is YouTube and Podcasts. And the only channels I get for $5 a month are channels I can get for free with a wire-hanger.

3- You need 3 clunky devices to make this thing work!??!! I have no idea why they didn&#039;t put the receiver and the DVR together. It must have been to get it to market faster.  Their antena is the size of a speaker from the 80&#039;s. FAIL!!

4- It took literally 1 hour to setup the box. That includes 15 minutes of putting the three devices together, and downloading new firmware for the glitchy product. Once up and running, I was forced to go through a painstaking process that required info such as Gender and Age. This including zip-code is invaluable for advertisers, but crappy for a user who is paying a subscription.

5- The interface and remote are inconsistent. Each screen requires a different set of buttons. These guys have no user-interaction sense. I constantly had to look down at the remote to control the screen. It should be a passive experience!!

Normally I give new products the benefit of the doubt, but this has no future. A total waste of money. Just buy yourself a cheap computer and hook it up to your TV and run free software such as Plex or Boxee on it... You&#039;ll save yourself $500.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrible Product!! #FAIL</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my list of why this is a fail.</p>
<p>1- This product is pre-alpha. I&#8217;m embarrassed that BestBuy is putting the product on their shelves. I encountered major bugs while performing simple tasks. Try downloading any content with it. You&#8217;ll get white static for about 3 seconds.</p>
<p>2- The product is touting itself as bridging the gap between internet &amp; TV. But meanwhile, the only web content I can get is YouTube and Podcasts. And the only channels I get for $5 a month are channels I can get for free with a wire-hanger.</p>
<p>3- You need 3 clunky devices to make this thing work!??!! I have no idea why they didn&#8217;t put the receiver and the DVR together. It must have been to get it to market faster.  Their antena is the size of a speaker from the 80&#8242;s. FAIL!!</p>
<p>4- It took literally 1 hour to setup the box. That includes 15 minutes of putting the three devices together, and downloading new firmware for the glitchy product. Once up and running, I was forced to go through a painstaking process that required info such as Gender and Age. This including zip-code is invaluable for advertisers, but crappy for a user who is paying a subscription.</p>
<p>5- The interface and remote are inconsistent. Each screen requires a different set of buttons. These guys have no user-interaction sense. I constantly had to look down at the remote to control the screen. It should be a passive experience!!</p>
<p>Normally I give new products the benefit of the doubt, but this has no future. A total waste of money. Just buy yourself a cheap computer and hook it up to your TV and run free software such as Plex or Boxee on it&#8230; You&#8217;ll save yourself $500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Is Everything A &#8220;Killer&#8221; of Something Else?&#160;-&#160;TechnoBuffalo</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-2/#comment-35386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Is Everything A &#8220;Killer&#8221; of Something Else?&#160;-&#160;TechnoBuffalo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-35386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is Sezmi a Cable TV Killer? - Technologizer [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Sezmi a Cable TV Killer? &#8211; Technologizer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTV Man</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-2/#comment-33627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewTV Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-33627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sezmi is available a Best Buy to order online:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sezmi+-+Personal+TV+Entertainment+System/9721917.p?skuId=9721917&amp;id=1218159872340]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sezmi is available a Best Buy to order online:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sezmi+-+Personal+TV+Entertainment+System/9721917.p?skuId=9721917&#038;id=1218159872340" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sezmi+-+Personal+TV+Entertainment+System/9721917.p?skuId=9721917&#038;id=1218159872340</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don't B Fooled</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/comment-page-2/#comment-33449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don't B Fooled]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19663#comment-33449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried this for the free 90 day demo and I was very disappointed. Here are a few reasons.
1. It&#039;s advertised as WiFi, but it&#039;s not. You need a wired ethernet connection or a &quot;Homeplug&quot; adapter ($150).
2. It did a good job receiving the local broadcast channels in HD, but none of the &quot;cable&quot; channels were in HD.
3. The internet channels were terrible, horrible, awful.
4. The interactive guide was not so interactive. Very difficult to understand. The guide doesn&#039;t allow you to directly tune to a channel, you have to scroll through everything. It is suppose to be a smart guide, learning your viewing habits, but with such a small amount of channels to draw info from it is pretty much useless.
 
I don&#039;t see how this can be successful in any way. I get a much better picture using my mac book pro (with a mini display port to hdmi cable) connected to my 50&quot; plasma. I get all the content I need with Hulu and Netflix. Not worth the $25 a month   going to ask for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this for the free 90 day demo and I was very disappointed. Here are a few reasons.<br />
1. It&#8217;s advertised as WiFi, but it&#8217;s not. You need a wired ethernet connection or a &#8220;Homeplug&#8221; adapter ($150).<br />
2. It did a good job receiving the local broadcast channels in HD, but none of the &#8220;cable&#8221; channels were in HD.<br />
3. The internet channels were terrible, horrible, awful.<br />
4. The interactive guide was not so interactive. Very difficult to understand. The guide doesn&#8217;t allow you to directly tune to a channel, you have to scroll through everything. It is suppose to be a smart guide, learning your viewing habits, but with such a small amount of channels to draw info from it is pretty much useless.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how this can be successful in any way. I get a much better picture using my mac book pro (with a mini display port to hdmi cable) connected to my 50&#8243; plasma. I get all the content I need with Hulu and Netflix. Not worth the $25 a month   going to ask for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

