<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome OS: Move Along, Nothing to See Here (Yet)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: with-technology-abstraction-is-inevitable &#171; eonly.us</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-46488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[with-technology-abstraction-is-inevitable &#171; eonly.us]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 19:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-46488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] course, isn&#8217;t the only company driving further abstraction of the computing experience. With Chrome OS, for instance, Google is pretty much trying to abstract everything out of the operating system [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, isn&#8217;t the only company driving further abstraction of the computing experience. With Chrome OS, for instance, Google is pretty much trying to abstract everything out of the operating system [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Technology, Abstraction is Inevitable</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-34496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Technology, Abstraction is Inevitable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-34496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] course, isn&#8217;t the only company driving further abstraction of the computing experience. With Chrome OS, for instance, Google is pretty much trying to abstract everything out of the operating system [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, isn&#8217;t the only company driving further abstraction of the computing experience. With Chrome OS, for instance, Google is pretty much trying to abstract everything out of the operating system [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Run Chrome OS Like a Native&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Run Chrome OS Like a Native&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all: News   Run in a virtualized machine, Google&#8217;s Chrome OS feels pretty much like Chrome-the-browser&#8211;which makes the whole [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all: News   Run in a virtualized machine, Google&#8217;s Chrome OS feels pretty much like Chrome-the-browser&#8211;which makes the whole [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice review - to the point. I tried it and basically using virtualbox with chrome os it the complicated way of using chrome dev on w7. By the way in my opinion chrome os will fail unless netbooks are sold under $200 but then again, a netbook will still be an inferior notebook/laptop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review &#8211; to the point. I tried it and basically using virtualbox with chrome os it the complicated way of using chrome dev on w7. By the way in my opinion chrome os will fail unless netbooks are sold under $200 but then again, a netbook will still be an inferior notebook/laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baxter</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Baxter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for doing the work, Harry. I&#039;ll check back in next fall sometime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for doing the work, Harry. I&#8217;ll check back in next fall sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DZ</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was your clock/time right? I was kinda fixated on my time being wrong and no obvious way to force it to sync with some server, somewhere. Maybe I didn&#039;t give it enough time. Perhaps 6 months will be enough to wait it out. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was your clock/time right? I was kinda fixated on my time being wrong and no obvious way to force it to sync with some server, somewhere. Maybe I didn&#8217;t give it enough time. Perhaps 6 months will be enough to wait it out. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Maslin</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Maslin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fired it up in VMware Workstation. I&#039;m relieved to know I&#039;m not the only one who couldn&#039;t find the &quot;off&quot; option! :)  It is definitely a work in progress, but we&#039;ll have to wait and see how much Google allows to interact with local HW &amp; files (and supports offline usage!).  Personally offline use is pretty important.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fired it up in VMware Workstation. I&#8217;m relieved to know I&#8217;m not the only one who couldn&#8217;t find the &#8220;off&#8221; option! :)  It is definitely a work in progress, but we&#8217;ll have to wait and see how much Google allows to interact with local HW &amp; files (and supports offline usage!).  Personally offline use is pretty important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Newman</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared Newman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds a lot like the browser build that surfaced last month. I loaded that up on an old machine and had the same experience -- essentially, Chrome, because none of the actual features are working.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a lot like the browser build that surfaced last month. I loaded that up on an old machine and had the same experience &#8212; essentially, Chrome, because none of the actual features are working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seumas</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/20/chrome-os-move-along-nothing-to-see-here-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-30221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seumas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=19948#comment-30221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just always assumed &quot;Google OS&quot; was going to be nothing more than a web browser and an interface to Google web applications. Sounds like - so far - that&#039;s accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just always assumed &#8220;Google OS&#8221; was going to be nothing more than a web browser and an interface to Google web applications. Sounds like &#8211; so far &#8211; that&#8217;s accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

