<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faded Chrome: Google&#8217;s Incomplete Mac Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome for Mac&#8211;Finally!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-31461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrome for Mac&#8211;Finally!&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-31461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chrome for OS X is missing some of the key features that make Chrome&#8217;s Windows version such a distinctive browser, including App Mode and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome for OS X is missing some of the key features that make Chrome&#8217;s Windows version such a distinctive browser, including App Mode and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Roberts</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, stop your grumbling and stick with Safari. It&#039;s a world-class browser with the fit and finish you expect from a world-class company. I will not patronize a company that treats the Mac as an afterthought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, stop your grumbling and stick with Safari. It&#8217;s a world-class browser with the fit and finish you expect from a world-class company. I will not patronize a company that treats the Mac as an afterthought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kasting</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Kasting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry: Yes, feature parity is the long-term goal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry: Yes, feature parity is the long-term goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with D9. If there is to be a Mac version of software then release it with the other OS versions and don&#039;t handicap it in comparison to the other releases. A sure fire way to upset the &quot;fanboys&quot; is to release a lesser-than version of software for the Mac. It also shows that you as a developer don&#039;t consider the Mac platform/community worth the effort to do the job right from the start.

Do it right or not at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with D9. If there is to be a Mac version of software then release it with the other OS versions and don&#8217;t handicap it in comparison to the other releases. A sure fire way to upset the &#8220;fanboys&#8221; is to release a lesser-than version of software for the Mac. It also shows that you as a developer don&#8217;t consider the Mac platform/community worth the effort to do the job right from the start.</p>
<p>Do it right or not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D9</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really...is this 1998? Do we really need to go back to the days of Windows apps appearing months, years before a Mac version does?

With the plethora of browsers out there, warts &amp; all, I&#039;ve got no patience for a would-be-cool browser with a Google icon on it, regardless of what they say it MIGHT do.

/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really&#8230;is this 1998? Do we really need to go back to the days of Windows apps appearing months, years before a Mac version does?</p>
<p>With the plethora of browsers out there, warts &amp; all, I&#8217;ve got no patience for a would-be-cool browser with a Google icon on it, regardless of what they say it MIGHT do.</p>
<p>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe c</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe c]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re not making the Mac a high enough priority to make me care about using this. Firefox releases Win, Mac and Linux all at the same time, and that&#039;s the bar set for everyone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re not making the Mac a high enough priority to make me care about using this. Firefox releases Win, Mac and Linux all at the same time, and that&#8217;s the bar set for everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the dev builds I&#039;d say I&#039;ll be switching my main browser for the first time since Safari debuted. Shame it&#039;s missing those things, but it&#039;s fast, light and (unlike, say, Firefox) feels like a Mac app.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the dev builds I&#8217;d say I&#8217;ll be switching my main browser for the first time since Safari debuted. Shame it&#8217;s missing those things, but it&#8217;s fast, light and (unlike, say, Firefox) feels like a Mac app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom b</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google does search extremely well, but, it appears that their skills as software mavens need much honing. People with high hopes for ChromeOS or Android 3.0 should take careful note.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google does search extremely well, but, it appears that their skills as software mavens need much honing. People with high hopes for ChromeOS or Android 3.0 should take careful note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/11/30/faded-chrome-googles-incomplete-mac-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-30722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20219#comment-30722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using the dev builds on my macs for about 6 months. The ONE thing I really NEED ASAP is the freaking bookmark manager. How hard is that to code?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using the dev builds on my macs for about 6 months. The ONE thing I really NEED ASAP is the freaking bookmark manager. How hard is that to code?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

