<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Bad Things Happen to Good Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backlin</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-32460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Backlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-32460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Backlight: I remember typing that actually...

I&#039;ll agree with Bouke on the Simcity point. I played Societies a whole 30 minutes before becoming unimpressed.

I found the workflow in iMovie &#039;08 to be ridiculously unintuitive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Backlight: I remember typing that actually&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree with Bouke on the Simcity point. I played Societies a whole 30 minutes before becoming unimpressed.</p>
<p>I found the workflow in iMovie &#8217;08 to be ridiculously unintuitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backlight</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-32439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Backlight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-32439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-32065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Rosenberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-32065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great article Harry.  Entertaining and with good lessons of what to avoid.  I sent links on this two two separate people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article Harry.  Entertaining and with good lessons of what to avoid.  I sent links on this two two separate people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry McCracken</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-31786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry McCracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-31786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jake Good point, Jake. Does seems like Apple did a pretty good job of making both old pros and newbies happy with the &#039;09 version though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jake Good point, Jake. Does seems like Apple did a pretty good job of making both old pros and newbies happy with the &#8217;09 version though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-31784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-31784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to take some issue with the inclusion of iMovie &#039;08. Yes, people like Pogue who were experienced users of the previous versions were baffled. But for me, every time I&#039;d tried to do something in the previous version (except when I had to, for an article I was editing), I soon said to hell with it. It was confusing and intimidating and just not fun. iMovie &#039;08, by contrast, was intuitive and straightforward and, well, fun. &#039;06 might have let serious video editors do more, but &#039;08 let the average user string together movie clips a lot easier. And really, if you&#039;re making a home movie, is it more important to have frame-accurate control over in and out points, or just to be able to say &quot;okay, this clip first, then this one, then this one&quot;? I always wondered how many new iMovie users &#039;08 created--all we heard was from disgruntled &#039;06 users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to take some issue with the inclusion of iMovie &#8217;08. Yes, people like Pogue who were experienced users of the previous versions were baffled. But for me, every time I&#8217;d tried to do something in the previous version (except when I had to, for an article I was editing), I soon said to hell with it. It was confusing and intimidating and just not fun. iMovie &#8217;08, by contrast, was intuitive and straightforward and, well, fun. &#8217;06 might have let serious video editors do more, but &#8217;08 let the average user string together movie clips a lot easier. And really, if you&#8217;re making a home movie, is it more important to have frame-accurate control over in and out points, or just to be able to say &#8220;okay, this clip first, then this one, then this one&#8221;? I always wondered how many new iMovie users &#8217;08 created&#8211;all we heard was from disgruntled &#8217;06 users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Snyder</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-31777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Snyder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-31777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. The DOS-5 video is amazing. I love it. What an artifact. Where on earth did someone find that, I wonder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. The DOS-5 video is amazing. I love it. What an artifact. Where on earth did someone find that, I wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouke Timbermont</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-31775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouke Timbermont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-31775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sim City Societies: Sim City had always been a BRILLIANT game, time and time again (from the very first version to the SimCity 4 and it&#039;s rush hour expansion) But EA decided it was time to dumb the whole game down to make it more &#039;accesable&#039;... reault: Fans of the series (including me) didn&#039;t buy the game, and new users (at which EA targetted the changed concept) didn&#039;t even care because it was kinda boring and easy.

I really hope there comes a SimCity 5 :-( Still playing SimCity 4 Rush Hour here, but since it&#039;s buggy on multi-core systems, I REALLY want an upgrade :&#039;(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sim City Societies: Sim City had always been a BRILLIANT game, time and time again (from the very first version to the SimCity 4 and it&#8217;s rush hour expansion) But EA decided it was time to dumb the whole game down to make it more &#8216;accesable&#8217;&#8230; reault: Fans of the series (including me) didn&#8217;t buy the game, and new users (at which EA targetted the changed concept) didn&#8217;t even care because it was kinda boring and easy.</p>
<p>I really hope there comes a SimCity 5 :-( Still playing SimCity 4 Rush Hour here, but since it&#8217;s buggy on multi-core systems, I REALLY want an upgrade :&#8217;(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie_Sheila</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2009/12/13/when-bad-things-happen-to-good-products/comment-page-1/#comment-31756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aussie_Sheila]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=20863#comment-31756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame Windows ME and Vista didn&#039;t make it to the article. Would have loved to hear your thoughts. But thanks for mentioning Hotmail. Actually, I pretty much stopped using it after Microsoft changed it. But same goes to Windows Live Messenger (MSN) - they made so many changes that it because annoying to use and I had to pretty much give it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame Windows ME and Vista didn&#8217;t make it to the article. Would have loved to hear your thoughts. But thanks for mentioning Hotmail. Actually, I pretty much stopped using it after Microsoft changed it. But same goes to Windows Live Messenger (MSN) &#8211; they made so many changes that it because annoying to use and I had to pretty much give it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

