<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snap Judgments! The Early iPhone Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, and Opinion About Personal Technology by Harry McCracken &#38; Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpme</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-2/#comment-34879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dpme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And also, as a total aside, is price. I had expect that the iPad would come in just under $1000. Looking at the pricing at Apple, I am (pleasantly) surprised that the most expensive iPad (3G, 64GB) tops out at $829.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also, as a total aside, is price. I had expect that the iPad would come in just under $1000. Looking at the pricing at Apple, I am (pleasantly) surprised that the most expensive iPad (3G, 64GB) tops out at $829.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-2/#comment-34877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alas, that is the problem; everything I see makes me want one! While people will debate practicality, the form factor and usability seems very appealing. I use my netbook mainly for email and web surfing. I don&#039;t type all that much on it, and the extra screen real estate is very appealing. It comes down now to cost beyond the device. I am already paying for the wireless modem for the netbook. To go 3G is $129, plus the service.

This points in many ways to the way I have done computing in the last few years. My last laptop was 6 pounds and duplicated my desktop. The netbook I got last year copies enough of what I need, and weighs a lot less. The form factor of the iPad is lightyears ahead of my netbook-how much typing do I think I will do, vs. how much will I actually do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, that is the problem; everything I see makes me want one! While people will debate practicality, the form factor and usability seems very appealing. I use my netbook mainly for email and web surfing. I don&#8217;t type all that much on it, and the extra screen real estate is very appealing. It comes down now to cost beyond the device. I am already paying for the wireless modem for the netbook. To go 3G is $129, plus the service.</p>
<p>This points in many ways to the way I have done computing in the last few years. My last laptop was 6 pounds and duplicated my desktop. The netbook I got last year copies enough of what I need, and weighs a lot less. The form factor of the iPad is lightyears ahead of my netbook-how much typing do I think I will do, vs. how much will I actually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gargravarr</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-2/#comment-34874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gargravarr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Drew, but we talking about the iPhone, not the Pad.  I was commenting on Pelpa&#039;s Captain Obvious statement that features = interest (and possible sales).  My point is that it&#039;s easy to claim to understand the success of something AFTER it becomes a success.  To do it beforehand takes more than just blind luck.

As for the iPad, if you think you can&#039;t use it, don&#039;t buy it.  Simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Drew, but we talking about the iPhone, not the Pad.  I was commenting on Pelpa&#8217;s Captain Obvious statement that features = interest (and possible sales).  My point is that it&#8217;s easy to claim to understand the success of something AFTER it becomes a success.  To do it beforehand takes more than just blind luck.</p>
<p>As for the iPad, if you think you can&#8217;t use it, don&#8217;t buy it.  Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-2/#comment-34869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gargravarr-but USB is not a &quot;new feature&quot;, it is an industry standard. Apple is entering a market where people expect certain things on a computing device. 

Having to use a connector (and carry that connector around) takes away from the utility of this device. Once you add in the keyboard dock, you&#039;ve moved away from the svelte appeal of this device. How much will I be carrying around in my bag to make this device useful?

The iPad is slick looking device; but as I have thought about it, how would I use it if I had one? It won&#039;t replace my netbook (I can&#039;t really type without the keyboard dock, and the dock does not look like that I could balance it in my lap).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gargravarr-but USB is not a &#8220;new feature&#8221;, it is an industry standard. Apple is entering a market where people expect certain things on a computing device. </p>
<p>Having to use a connector (and carry that connector around) takes away from the utility of this device. Once you add in the keyboard dock, you&#8217;ve moved away from the svelte appeal of this device. How much will I be carrying around in my bag to make this device useful?</p>
<p>The iPad is slick looking device; but as I have thought about it, how would I use it if I had one? It won&#8217;t replace my netbook (I can&#8217;t really type without the keyboard dock, and the dock does not look like that I could balance it in my lap).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gargravarr</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-2/#comment-34868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gargravarr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelpa - That&#039;s like saying the automobile wouldn&#039;t have been a success if they hadn&#039;t added seat belts, a roof, air con, etc.  Name me lots of successful products which did not evolve or add new features.  Arguments from hindsight are easy to make.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelpa &#8211; That&#8217;s like saying the automobile wouldn&#8217;t have been a success if they hadn&#8217;t added seat belts, a roof, air con, etc.  Name me lots of successful products which did not evolve or add new features.  Arguments from hindsight are easy to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad pricing: An ounce of perception &#124; Out of the Box</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-34857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPad pricing: An ounce of perception &#124; Out of the Box]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at Technologizer, Harry McCracken has a great post comparing some of the early skepticism around the iPad to that of the iPhone; it was a topic that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Technologizer, Harry McCracken has a great post comparing some of the early skepticism around the iPad to that of the iPhone; it was a topic that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-34851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote a similar story for the Industry Standard a while back, contacting early iPhone skeptics to find out what they thought a year after its introduction:

http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a similar story for the Industry Standard a while back, contacting early iPhone skeptics to find out what they thought a year after its introduction:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-34847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting look back.  Apple has done a decent job of addressing issues with the original iPhone, either through software (copy &amp; paste) or hardware (3G) updates.  As a consultant who travels weekly, there are three features I was hoping for that will keep me waiting until rev 2:

1. USB/SDHC - I would like to use an iPad to manage my iPhoto library and have the ability to upload/email photos while on the road.  I currently do this with my work laptop (copy pic from camera, upload to Flickr, sync back to iPhoto when I get home), but would prefer to have an easier way.  I know there is an adapter, so this isn&#039;t a deal-breaker, just a gripe.  Another option would be if the iPad will work with Eye-fi cards.

2. T-Mobile Support - I don&#039;t understand why they are selling the iPad unlocked, but didn&#039;t include support for T-Mobile&#039;s 3G network in the US.  Again, not a deal-breaker, but without that I will be sticking with the wifi version.  

3. Webcam - My primary use for this type of device would be using Skype/iChat to video chat with my family while I&#039;m on the road.  Again, I currently use my work laptop+external webcam for this, but would happily carry a smaller, faster device for this purpose.

If they add a webcam, I&#039;ll buy the wifi device and camera connection kit on release.  If rev 2 comes with webcam/usb/T-Mobile frequencies, I&#039;ll pick up the 3G version in an instant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting look back.  Apple has done a decent job of addressing issues with the original iPhone, either through software (copy &amp; paste) or hardware (3G) updates.  As a consultant who travels weekly, there are three features I was hoping for that will keep me waiting until rev 2:</p>
<p>1. USB/SDHC &#8211; I would like to use an iPad to manage my iPhoto library and have the ability to upload/email photos while on the road.  I currently do this with my work laptop (copy pic from camera, upload to Flickr, sync back to iPhoto when I get home), but would prefer to have an easier way.  I know there is an adapter, so this isn&#8217;t a deal-breaker, just a gripe.  Another option would be if the iPad will work with Eye-fi cards.</p>
<p>2. T-Mobile Support &#8211; I don&#8217;t understand why they are selling the iPad unlocked, but didn&#8217;t include support for T-Mobile&#8217;s 3G network in the US.  Again, not a deal-breaker, but without that I will be sticking with the wifi version.  </p>
<p>3. Webcam &#8211; My primary use for this type of device would be using Skype/iChat to video chat with my family while I&#8217;m on the road.  Again, I currently use my work laptop+external webcam for this, but would happily carry a smaller, faster device for this purpose.</p>
<p>If they add a webcam, I&#8217;ll buy the wifi device and camera connection kit on release.  If rev 2 comes with webcam/usb/T-Mobile frequencies, I&#8217;ll pick up the 3G version in an instant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Dixon</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-34840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Dixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Greenspun has now opined, sort of...

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2010/02/01/apple-ipad-and-bigger-touch-screens/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Greenspun has now opined, sort of&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2010/02/01/apple-ipad-and-bigger-touch-screens/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2010/02/01/apple-ipad-and-bigger-touch-screens/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://technologizer.com/2010/02/01/iphone-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-34837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologizer.com/?p=22943#comment-34837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am really torn on this. The iPhone succeeded since it fully replaced prior devices that were not nearly as good. 

The iPad, it seems, is a little different. It seems to be a new category, but is aimed at the netbook. If you go back and look at criticism of Win7 starter edition, people criticized that you could only run three apps at one time. 

From what I understand, the iPad only runs one app at a time. Also, it appears you cannot simply move files on and off the iPad the way you can on netbook. I find I use my netbook (with Win7 starter) as a big flash drive. I can run the programs I want, and run more than one program at a time. 

Now, having said that, as a device for consuming media (as opposed to creating it) the iPad seems very impressive. 

I was surprised by the price point of $499. I think that alone will sell a lot of these. The problem is if I am going on a trip, what I am going to take with me? If I had a iPhone and a netbook, where does the iPad fit into that?

As an aside, what would be really neat is seeing (I am a high school teacher) is the iPad as a educational tool. Digital textbook, and specific apps that would allow students to use the device within the class, and then they could submit assignments electronically. 

Since all students would be doing the same thing, running one app at a time would not be a problem. 

Drew]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really torn on this. The iPhone succeeded since it fully replaced prior devices that were not nearly as good. </p>
<p>The iPad, it seems, is a little different. It seems to be a new category, but is aimed at the netbook. If you go back and look at criticism of Win7 starter edition, people criticized that you could only run three apps at one time. </p>
<p>From what I understand, the iPad only runs one app at a time. Also, it appears you cannot simply move files on and off the iPad the way you can on netbook. I find I use my netbook (with Win7 starter) as a big flash drive. I can run the programs I want, and run more than one program at a time. </p>
<p>Now, having said that, as a device for consuming media (as opposed to creating it) the iPad seems very impressive. </p>
<p>I was surprised by the price point of $499. I think that alone will sell a lot of these. The problem is if I am going on a trip, what I am going to take with me? If I had a iPhone and a netbook, where does the iPad fit into that?</p>
<p>As an aside, what would be really neat is seeing (I am a high school teacher) is the iPad as a educational tool. Digital textbook, and specific apps that would allow students to use the device within the class, and then they could submit assignments electronically. </p>
<p>Since all students would be doing the same thing, running one app at a time would not be a problem. </p>
<p>Drew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

